create-an-asset
Create an Asset
Generate custom sales assets tailored to your prospect, audience, and goals. Supports interactive landing pages, presentation decks, executive one-pagers, and workflow/architecture demos.
Triggers
Invoke this skill when:
- User says
/create-an-assetor/create-an-asset [CompanyName] - User asks to "create an asset", "build a demo", "make a landing page", "mock up a workflow"
- User needs a customer-facing deliverable for a sales conversation
Overview
This skill creates professional sales assets by gathering context about:
- (a) The Prospect — company, contacts, conversations, pain points
- (b) The Audience — who's viewing, what they care about
- (c) The Purpose — goal of the asset, desired next action
- (d) The Format — landing page, deck, one-pager, or workflow demo
The skill then researches, structures, and builds a polished, branded asset ready to share with customers.
Phase 0: Context Detection & Input Collection
Step 0.1: Detect Seller Context
From the user's email domain, identify what company they work for.
Actions:
- Extract domain from user's email
- Search:
"[domain]" company products services site:linkedin.com OR site:crunchbase.com - Determine seller context:
| Scenario | Action |
|---|---|
| Single-product company | Auto-populate seller context |
| Multi-product company | Ask: "Which product or solution is this asset for?" |
| Consultant/agency/generic domain | Ask: "What company or product are you representing?" |
| Unknown/startup | Ask: "Briefly, what are you selling?" |
Store seller context:
seller:
company: "[Company Name]"
product: "[Product/Service]"
value_props:
- "[Key value prop 1]"
- "[Key value prop 2]"
- "[Key value prop 3]"
differentiators:
- "[Differentiator 1]"
- "[Differentiator 2]"
pricing_model: "[If publicly known]"
Persist to knowledge base for future sessions. On subsequent invocations, confirm: "I have your seller context from last time — still selling [Product] at [Company]?"
Step 0.2: Collect Prospect Context (a)
Ask the user:
| Field | Prompt | Required |
|---|---|---|
| Company | "Which company is this asset for?" | ✓ Yes |
| Key contacts | "Who are the key contacts? (names, roles)" | No |
| Deal stage | "What stage is this deal?" | ✓ Yes |
| Pain points | "What pain points or priorities have they shared?" | No |
| Past materials | "Upload any conversation materials (transcripts, emails, notes, call recordings)" | No |
Deal stage options:
- Intro / First meeting
- Discovery
- Evaluation / Technical review
- POC / Pilot
- Negotiation
- Close
Step 0.3: Collect Audience Context (b)
Ask the user:
| Field | Prompt | Required |
|---|---|---|
| Audience type | "Who's viewing this?" | ✓ Yes |
| Specific roles | "Any specific titles to tailor for? (e.g., CTO, VP Engineering, CFO)" | No |
| Primary concern | "What do they care most about?" | ✓ Yes |
| Objections | "Any concerns or objections to address?" | No |
Audience type options:
- Executive (C-suite, VPs)
- Technical (Architects, Engineers, Developers)
- Operations (Ops, IT, Procurement)
- Mixed / Cross-functional
Primary concern options:
- ROI / Business impact
- Technical depth / Architecture
- Strategic alignment
- Risk mitigation / Security
- Implementation / Timeline
Step 0.4: Collect Purpose Context (c)
Ask the user:
| Field | Prompt | Required |
|---|---|---|
| Goal | "What's the goal of this asset?" | ✓ Yes |
| Desired action | "What should the viewer do after seeing this?" | ✓ Yes |
Goal options:
- Intro / First impression
- Discovery follow-up
- Technical deep-dive
- Executive alignment / Business case
- POC proposal
- Deal close
Step 0.5: Select Format (d)
Ask the user: "What format works best for this?"
| Format | Description | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| Interactive landing page | Multi-tab page with demos, metrics, calculators | Exec alignment, intros, value prop |
| Deck-style | Linear slides, presentation-ready | Formal meetings, large audiences |
| One-pager | Single-scroll executive summary | Leave-behinds, quick summaries |
| Workflow / Architecture demo | Interactive diagram with animated flow | Technical deep-dives, POC demos, integrations |
Step 0.6: Format-Specific Inputs
If "Workflow / Architecture demo" selected:
First, parse from user's description. Look for:
- Systems and components mentioned
- Data flows described
- Human interaction points
- Example scenarios
Then ask for any gaps:
| If Missing... | Ask... |
|---|---|
| Components unclear | "What systems or components are involved? (databases, APIs, AI, middleware, etc.)" |
| Flow unclear | "Walk me through the step-by-step flow" |
| Human touchpoints unclear | "Where does a human interact in this workflow?" |
| Scenario vague | "What's a concrete example scenario to demo?" |
| Integration specifics | "Any specific tools or platforms to highlight?" |
Phase 1: Research (Adaptive)
Assess Context Richness
| Level | Indicators | Research Depth |
|---|---|---|
| Rich | Transcripts uploaded, detailed pain points, clear requirements | Light — fill gaps only |
| Moderate | Some context, no transcripts | Medium — company + industry |
| Sparse | Just company name | Deep — full research pass |
Always Research:
-
Prospect basics
- Search:
"[Company]" annual report investor presentation 2025 2026 - Search:
"[Company]" CEO strategy priorities 2025 2026 - Extract: Revenue, employees, key metrics, strategic priorities
- Search:
-
Leadership
- Search:
"[Company]" CEO CTO CIO 2025 - Extract: Names, titles, recent quotes on strategy/technology
- Search:
-
Brand colors
- Search:
"[Company]" brand guidelines - Or extract from company website
- Store: Primary color, secondary color, accent
- Search:
If Moderate/Sparse Context, Also Research:
-
Industry context
- Search:
"[Industry]" trends challenges 2025 2026 - Extract: Common pain points, market dynamics
- Search:
-
Technology landscape
- Search:
"[Company]" technology stack tools platforms - Extract: Current solutions, potential integration points
- Search:
-
Competitive context
- Search:
"[Company]" vs [seller's competitors] - Extract: Current solutions, switching signals
- Search:
If Transcripts/Materials Uploaded:
- Conversation analysis
- Extract: Stated pain points, decision criteria, objections, timeline
- Identify: Key quotes to reference (use their exact language)
- Note: Specific terminology, acronyms, internal project names
Phase 2: Structure Decision
Interactive Landing Page
| Purpose | Recommended Sections |
|---|---|
| Intro | Company Fit → Solution Overview → Key Use Cases → Why Us → Next Steps |
| Discovery follow-up | Their Priorities → How We Help → Relevant Examples → ROI Framework → Next Steps |
| Technical deep-dive | Architecture → Security & Compliance → Integration → Performance → Support |
| Exec alignment | Strategic Fit → Business Impact → ROI Calculator → Risk Mitigation → Partnership |
| POC proposal | Scope → Success Criteria → Timeline → Team → Investment → Next Steps |
| Deal close | Value Summary → Pricing → Implementation Plan → Terms → Sign-off |
Audience adjustments:
- Executive: Lead with business impact, ROI, strategic alignment
- Technical: Lead with architecture, security, integration depth
- Operations: Lead with workflow impact, change management, support
- Mixed: Balance strategic + tactical; use tabs to separate depth levels
Deck-Style
Same sections as landing page, formatted as linear slides:
1. Title slide (Prospect + Seller logos, partnership framing)
2. Agenda
3-N. One section per slide (or 2-3 slides for dense sections)
N+1. Summary / Key takeaways
N+2. Next steps / CTA
N+3. Appendix (optional — detailed specs, pricing, etc.)
Slide principles:
- One key message per slide
- Visual > text-heavy
- Use prospect's metrics and language
- Include speaker notes
One-Pager
Condense to single-scroll format:
┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
│ HERO: "[Prospect Goal] with [Product]" │
├─────────────────────────────────────┤
│ KEY POINT 1 │ KEY POINT 2 │ KEY POINT 3 │
│ [Icon + 2-3 │ [Icon + 2-3 │ [Icon + 2-3 │
│ sentences] │ sentences] │ sentences] │
├─────────────────────────────────────┤
│ PROOF POINT: [Metric, quote, or case study] │
├─────────────────────────────────────┤
│ CTA: [Clear next action] │ [Contact info] │
└─────────────────────────────────────┘
Workflow / Architecture Demo
Structure based on complexity:
| Complexity | Components | Structure |
|---|---|---|
| Simple | 3-5 | Single-view diagram with step annotations |
| Medium | 5-10 | Zoomable canvas with step-by-step walkthrough |
| Complex | 10+ | Multi-layer view (overview → detailed) with guided tour |
Standard elements:
- Title bar:
[Scenario Name] — Powered by [Seller Product] - Component nodes: Visual boxes/icons for each system
- Flow arrows: Animated connections showing data movement
- Step panel: Sidebar explaining current step in plain language
- Controls: Play / Pause / Step Forward / Step Back / Reset
- Annotations: Callouts for key decision points and value-adds
- Data preview: Sample payloads or transformations at each step
Phase 3: Content Generation
General Principles
All content should:
- Reference specific pain points from user input or transcripts
- Use prospect's language — their terminology, their stated priorities
- Map seller's product → prospect's needs explicitly
- Include proof points where available (case studies, metrics, quotes)
- Feel tailored, not templated
Section Templates
Hero / Intro
Headline: "[Prospect's Goal] with [Seller's Product]"
Subhead: Tie to their stated priority or top industry challenge
Metrics: 3-4 key facts about the prospect (shows we did homework)
Their Priorities (if discovery follow-up)
Reference specific pain points from conversation:
- Use their exact words where possible
- Show we listened and understood
- Connect each to how we help
Solution Mapping
For each pain point:
├── The challenge (in their words)
├── How [Product] addresses it
├── Proof point or example
└── Outcome / benefit
Use Cases / Demos
3-5 relevant use cases:
├── Visual mockup or interactive demo
├── Business impact (quantified if possible)
├── "How it works" — 3-4 step summary
└── Relevant to their industry/role
ROI / Business Case
Interactive calculator with:
├── Inputs relevant to their business (from research)
│ ├── Number of users/developers
│ ├── Current costs or time spent
│ └── Expected improvement %
├── Outputs:
│ ├── Annual value / savings
│ ├── Cost of solution
│ ├── Net ROI
│ └── Payback period
└── Assumptions clearly stated (editable)
Why Us / Differentiators
├── Differentiators vs. alternatives they might consider
├── Trust, security, compliance positioning
├── Support and partnership model
└── Customer proof points (logos, quotes, case studies)
Next Steps / CTA
├── Clear action aligned to Purpose (c)
├── Specific next step (not vague "let's chat")
├── Contact information
├── Suggested timeline
└── What happens after they take action
Workflow Demo Content
Component Definitions
For each system, define:
component:
id: "snowflake"
label: "Snowflake Data Warehouse"
type: "database" # database | api | ai | middleware | human | document | output
icon: "database"
description: "Financial performance data"
brand_color: "#29B5E8"
Component types:
human— Person initiating or receivingdocument— PDFs, contracts, filesai— AI/ML models, agentsdatabase— Data stores, warehousesapi— APIs, servicesmiddleware— Integration platforms, MCP serversoutput— Dashboards, reports, notifications
Flow Steps
For each step, define:
step:
number: 1
from: "human"
to: "claude"
action: "Initiates performance review"
description: "Sarah, a Brand Analyst at [Prospect], kicks off the quarterly review..."
data_example: "Review request: Nike brand, Q4 2025"
duration: "~1 second"
value_note: "No manual data gathering required"
Scenario Narrative
Write a clear, specific walkthrough:
Step 1: Human Trigger
"Sarah, a Brand Performance Analyst at Centric Brands, needs to review
Q4 performance for the Nike license agreement. She opens the review
dashboard and clicks 'Start Review'..."
Step 2: Contract Analysis
"Claude retrieves the Nike contract PDF and extracts the performance
obligations: minimum $50M revenue, 12% margin requirement, quarterly
reporting deadline..."
Step 3: Data Query
"Claude formulates a query and sends it to Workato DataGenie:
'Get Q4 2025 revenue and gross margin for Nike brand from Snowflake'..."
Step 4: Results & Synthesis
"Snowflake returns the data. Claude compares actuals vs. obligations:
Revenue $52.3M ✓ (exceeded by $2.3M)
Margin 11.2% ⚠️ (0.8% below threshold)..."
Step 5: Insight Delivery
"Claude synthesizes findings into an executive summary with
recommendations: 'Review promotional spend allocation to improve
margin performance...'"
Phase 4: Visual Design
Color System
:root {
/* === Prospect Brand (Primary) === */
--brand-primary: #[extracted from research];
--brand-secondary: #[extracted];
--brand-primary-rgb: [r, g, b]; /* For rgba() usage */
/* === Dark Theme Base === */
--bg-primary: #0a0d14;
--bg-elevated: #0f131c;
--bg-surface: #161b28;
--bg-hover: #1e2536;
/* === Text === */
--text-primary: #ffffff;
--text-secondary: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.7);
--text-muted: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.5);
/* === Accent === */
--accent: var(--brand-primary);
--accent-hover: var(--brand-secondary);
--accent-glow: rgba(var(--brand-primary-rgb), 0.3);
/* === Status === */
--success: #10b981;
--warning: #f59e0b;
--error: #ef4444;
}
Typography
/* Primary: Clean, professional sans-serif */
font-family: 'Inter', -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, sans-serif;
/* Headings */
h1: 2.5rem, font-weight: 700
h2: 1.75rem, font-weight: 600
h3: 1.25rem, font-weight: 600
/* Body */
body: 1rem, font-weight: 400, line-height: 1.6
/* Captions/Labels */
small: 0.875rem, font-weight: 500
Visual Elements
Cards:
- Background:
var(--bg-surface) - Border: 1px solid rgba(255,255,255,0.1)
- Border-radius: 12px
- Box-shadow: subtle, layered
- Hover: slight elevation, border glow
Buttons:
- Primary:
var(--accent)background, white text - Secondary: transparent, accent border
- Hover: brightness increase, subtle scale
Animations:
- Transitions: 200-300ms ease
- Tab switches: fade + slide
- Hover states: smooth, not jarring
- Loading: subtle pulse or skeleton
Workflow Demo Specific
Component Nodes:
.node {
background: var(--bg-surface);
border: 2px solid var(--brand-primary);
border-radius: 12px;
padding: 16px;
min-width: 140px;
}
.node.active {
box-shadow: 0 0 20px var(--accent-glow);
border-color: var(--accent);
}
.node.human {
border-color: #f59e0b; /* Warm color for humans */
}
.node.ai {
background: linear-gradient(135deg, var(--bg-surface), var(--bg-elevated));
border-color: var(--accent);
}
Flow Arrows:
.arrow {
stroke: var(--text-muted);
stroke-width: 2;
fill: none;
marker-end: url(#arrowhead);
}
.arrow.active {
stroke: var(--accent);
stroke-dasharray: 8 4;
animation: flowDash 1s linear infinite;
}
Canvas:
.canvas {
background:
radial-gradient(circle at center, var(--bg-elevated) 0%, var(--bg-primary) 100%),
url("data:image/svg+xml,..."); /* Subtle grid pattern */
overflow: auto;
}
Phase 5: Clarifying Questions (REQUIRED)
Before building any asset, always ask clarifying questions. This ensures alignment and prevents wasted effort.
Step 5.1: Summarize Understanding
First, show the user what you understood:
"Here's what I'm planning to build:
**Asset**: [Format] for [Prospect Company]
**Audience**: [Audience type] — specifically [roles if known]
**Goal**: [Purpose] → driving toward [desired action]
**Key themes**: [2-3 main points to emphasize]
[For workflow demos, also show:]
**Components**: [List of systems]
**Flow**: [Step 1] → [Step 2] → [Step 3] → ...
Step 5.2: Ask Standard Questions (ALL formats)
| Question | Why |
|---|---|
| "Does this match your vision?" | Confirm understanding |
| "What's the ONE thing this must nail to succeed?" | Focus on priority |
| "Tone preference? (Bold & confident / Consultative / Technical & precise)" | Style alignment |
| "Focused and concise, or comprehensive?" | Scope calibration |
Step 5.3: Ask Format-Specific Questions
Interactive Landing Page:
- "Which sections matter most for this audience?"
- "Any specific demos or use cases to highlight?"
- "Should I include an ROI calculator?"
- "Any competitor positioning to address?"
Deck-Style:
- "How long is the presentation? (helps with slide count)"
- "Presenting live, or a leave-behind?"
- "Any specific flow or narrative arc in mind?"
One-Pager:
- "What's the single most important message?"
- "Any specific proof point or stat to feature?"
- "Will this be printed or digital?"
Workflow / Architecture Demo:
- "Let me confirm the components: [list]. Anything missing?"
- "Here's the flow I understood: [steps]. Correct?"
- "Should the demo show realistic sample data, or keep it abstract?"
- "Any integration details to highlight or downplay?"
- "Should viewers be able to click through steps, or auto-play?"
Step 5.4: Confirm and Proceed
After user responds:
"Got it. I have what I need. Building your [format] now..."
Or, if still unclear:
"One more quick question: [specific follow-up]"
Max 2 rounds of questions. If still ambiguous, make a reasonable choice and note: "I went with X — easy to adjust if you prefer Y."
Phase 6: Build & Deliver
Build the Asset
Following all specifications above:
- Generate structure based on Phase 2
- Create content based on Phase 3
- Apply visual design based on Phase 4
- Ensure all interactive elements work
- Test responsiveness (if applicable)
Output Format
All formats: Self-contained HTML file
- All CSS inline or in
<style>tags - All JS inline or in
<script>tags - No external dependencies (except Google Fonts)
- Single file for easy sharing
File naming: [ProspectName]-[format]-[date].html
- Example:
CentricBrands-workflow-demo-2026-01-28.html
Delivery Message
## ✓ Asset Created: [Prospect Name]
[View your asset](computer:///path/to/file.html)
---
**Summary**
- **Format**: [Interactive Page / Deck / One-Pager / Workflow Demo]
- **Audience**: [Type and roles]
- **Purpose**: [Goal] → [Desired action]
- **Sections/Steps**: [Count and list]
---
**Deployment Options**
To share this with your customer:
- **Static hosting**: Upload to Netlify, Vercel, GitHub Pages, AWS S3, or any static host
- **Password protection**: Most hosts offer this (e.g., Netlify site protection)
- **Direct share**: Send the HTML file directly — it's fully self-contained
- **Embed**: The file can be iframed into other pages if needed
---
**Customization**
Let me know if you'd like to:
- Adjust colors or styling
- Add, remove, or reorder sections
- Refine any messaging or copy
- Change the flow or architecture (for workflow demos)
- Add more interactive elements
- Export as PDF or static images
Phase 7: Iteration Support
After delivery, be ready to iterate:
| User Request | Action |
|---|---|
| "Change the colors" | Regenerate with new palette, keep content |
| "Add a section on X" | Insert new section, maintain flow |
| "Make it shorter" | Condense, prioritize key points |
| "The flow is wrong" | Rebuild architecture based on correction |
| "Use our brand instead" | Switch from prospect brand to seller brand |
| "Add more detail on step 3" | Expand that section specifically |
| "Can I get this as a PDF?" | Provide print-optimized version |
Remember: Default to prospect's brand colors, but seller can adjust to their own brand or a neutral palette after initial build.
Quality Checklist
Before delivering, verify:
Content
- Prospect company name spelled correctly throughout
- Leadership names are current (not outdated)
- Pain points accurately reflect input/transcripts
- Seller's product accurately represented
- No placeholder text remaining
- Proof points are accurate and sourced
Visual
- Brand colors applied correctly
- All text readable (contrast)
- Animations smooth, not distracting
- Mobile responsive (if interactive page)
- Dark theme looks polished
Functional
- All tabs/sections load correctly
- Interactive elements work (calculators, demos)
- Workflow steps animate properly (if applicable)
- Navigation is intuitive
- CTA is clear and clickable
Professional
- Tone matches audience
- Appropriate level of detail for purpose
- No typos or grammatical errors
- Feels tailored, not templated
Examples
Example 1: Executive Landing Page
Input:
- Prospect: Acme Corp (manufacturing)
- Audience: C-suite
- Purpose: Exec alignment after discovery
- Format: Interactive landing page
Output structure:
[Tabs]
Strategic Fit | Business Impact | ROI Calculator | Security & Trust | Next Steps
[Strategic Fit tab]
- Acme's stated priorities (from discovery call)
- How [Product] aligns
- Relevant manufacturing customers
Example 2: Technical Workflow Demo
Input:
- Prospect: Centric Brands
- Audience: IT architects
- Purpose: POC proposal
- Format: Workflow demo
- Components: Claude, Workato DataGenie, Snowflake, PDF contracts
Output structure:
[Interactive canvas with 5 nodes]
Human → Claude → PDF Contracts → Workato → Snowflake
↓
[Results back to Human]
[Step-by-step walkthrough with sample data]
[Controls: Play | Pause | Step | Reset]
Example 3: Sales One-Pager
Input:
- Prospect: TechStart Inc
- Audience: VP Engineering
- Purpose: Leave-behind after first meeting
- Format: One-pager
Output structure:
Hero: "Accelerate TechStart's Product Velocity"
Point 1: [Dev productivity]
Point 2: [Code quality]
Point 3: [Time to market]
Proof: "Similar companies saw 40% faster releases"
CTA: "Schedule technical deep-dive"
Appendix: Component Icons
For workflow demos, use these icon mappings:
| Type | Icon | Example |
|---|---|---|
| human | 👤 or person SVG | User, Analyst, Admin |
| document | 📄 or file SVG | PDF, Contract, Report |
| ai | 🤖 or brain SVG | Claude, AI Agent |
| database | 🗄️ or cylinder SVG | Snowflake, Postgres |
| api | 🔌 or plug SVG | REST API, GraphQL |
| middleware | ⚡ or hub SVG | Workato, MCP Server |
| output | 📊 or screen SVG | Dashboard, Report |
Appendix: Brand Color Fallbacks
If brand colors cannot be extracted:
| Industry | Primary | Secondary |
|---|---|---|
| Technology | #2563eb | #7c3aed |
| Finance | #0f172a | #3b82f6 |
| Healthcare | #0891b2 | #06b6d4 |
| Manufacturing | #ea580c | #f97316 |
| Retail | #db2777 | #ec4899 |
| Energy | #16a34a | #22c55e |
| Default | #3b82f6 | #8b5cf6 |
Skill created for generalized sales asset generation. Works for any seller, any product, any prospect.