Answer to Harassment Complaint

Drafts a responsive Answer on behalf of a defendant employer in employment harassment litigation, preserving all available defenses and establishing the client's factual and legal positions.

Prerequisites

Gather before drafting:

• Complaint — all numbered paragraphs, exhibits, referenced documents
• Anti-harassment policies — written policy, training records, complaint procedures, acknowledgment forms
• Investigation file — internal investigation triggered by plaintiff's complaint (or absence thereof)
• Personnel records — plaintiff's employment dates, title, reporting chain, disciplinary history
• Alleged harasser's records — supervisory authority, tangible action authority, employment status
• EEOC charge — filing date, charge scope, right-to-sue letter date

Quick Start

1. Mirror complaint caption exactly (court, case number, parties) → title: DEFENDANT'S ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
2. Respond to each numbered paragraph (admit / deny / lack knowledge)
3. Assert all applicable affirmative defenses as separately numbered paragraphs
4. Add prayer for relief and signature block with certificate of service

Core Workflow

Paragraph-by-Paragraph Responses

For each numbered paragraph use one response:

Response	When to Use
Admit	Indisputable facts: corporate existence, employment dates, policy existence
Deny	False allegations or legal conclusions ("severe," "pervasive," "unwelcome")
Lack sufficient knowledge	Plaintiff's subjective experiences, statements outside defendant's presence — use sparingly for facts defendant should know

Drafting rules:

• Parse compound paragraphs — admit true portions, deny the rest specifically
• Document references: admit existence, deny plaintiff's characterization
• Never blanket-deny paragraphs containing mixed assertions
• Keep responses consistent with documents to be produced in discovery

Affirmative Defenses

Assert each in a separately numbered paragraph. Waiver applies to unpleaded defenses.

Defense	Key Elements
Failure to state a claim	Conduct not severe/pervasive enough to alter employment conditions; isolated incidents or petty slights insufficient
Faragher-Ellerth (supervisor, no tangible action)	(1) Employer exercised reasonable care: written policy, training, complaint channels, prompt investigation; (2) Plaintiff unreasonably failed to use available procedures
Statute of limitations	EEOC: 180 days (non-deferral) / 300 days (deferral) per discrete act; suit: 90 days from right-to-sue; state: 1–3 years [VERIFY state-specific period]
Continuing violation	Discrete acts outside limitations not recoverable under continuing-violation theory
No protected-characteristic nexus	Conduct not because of sex, race, or other protected class
Failure to exhaust	Claims outside EEOC charge scope are unexhausted
No compensable damages	No cognizable harm, or harm from independent intervening factors
Failure to mitigate	Plaintiff failed to take reasonable steps to reduce damages
After-acquired evidence	Post-separation misconduct warranting discharge [VERIFY jurisdiction's application to harassment]
Release/waiver	Assert if settlement agreement or release exists
Statutory coverage	Employer below Title VII / state-law employee threshold

Include reservation to assert additional defenses as discovery proceeds (receptiveness varies by jurisdiction).

Prayer for Relief

• Dismissal with prejudice
• Judgment for defendant on all claims
• Costs of suit
• Attorney's fees (prevailing defendant where frivolous [VERIFY standard]; contractual basis if applicable)
• Such other relief as the court deems just

Signature Block & Service

Include attorney name, bar number, firm, address, phone, email, filing date. Attach Certificate of Service with date and method of service on plaintiff's counsel.

Pitfalls and Checks

• Supervisor vs. co-worker: Faragher-Ellerth applies only when alleged harasser is a supervisor with no tangible employment action; co-worker harassment uses a negligence standard
• Tangible employment action: Discharge, demotion, or undesirable reassignment defeats Faragher-Ellerth — pivot to other defenses
• No argument in pleading: The Answer is not a brief — strike editorial commentary
• Internal consistency: Confirm paragraph responses align with asserted affirmative defenses before filing
• Local rules: Verify page limits, font, spacing, margins, and line-numbering for the specific court
• Amendment: Track post-filing facts that may require an amended answer; check deadline for amendment as of right