reasoningbank-with-agentdb
Audited by Socket on Feb 16, 2026
1 alert found:
Security[Skill Scanner] Backtick command substitution detected All findings: [HIGH] command_injection: Backtick command substitution detected (CI003) [AITech 9.1.4] [HIGH] command_injection: Backtick command substitution detected (CI003) [AITech 9.1.4] [HIGH] command_injection: Backtick command substitution detected (CI003) [AITech 9.1.4] [HIGH] command_injection: Backtick command substitution detected (CI003) [AITech 9.1.4] [HIGH] command_injection: Backtick command substitution detected (CI003) [AITech 9.1.4] Overall, the fragment is coherent and aligns with its stated purpose of enabling ReasoningBank-style adaptive learning backed by AgentDB. There are no obvious malicious intents or credential exfiltration patterns in the text. The main concerns are standard supply-chain and runtime security considerations typical for public-tool dependencies (trust in AgentDB, integrity of embeddings, and access controls). This is largely Benign with suspicious-to-minor risk due to potential misconfigurations and dependency trust, but not evidence of malware or intentional damage. LLM verification: This SKILL.md is documentation for a legitimate-seeming ReasoningBank skill that integrates with AgentDB. I find no direct malicious code or obfuscation in the file. The principal security concerns are supply-chain risk from using npx to fetch and execute agentdb@latest, and guidance to access broad local directories (D:\Projects\*) and migrate local memory files without explicit PII handling. Those are operational/security risks (possible data exposure) but not clear evidence of malware. Recomm