Evidence Consistency Auditor

Use this skill after intake and before full drafting to harden factual integrity.

Bundled materials

• references/workflow.md
• references/quality-standard.md
• assets/templates/evidence-consistency-report-template.md
• assets/templates/open-questions-template.md
• assets/templates/decision-log-template.md

Inputs

• tracking/source-register.md
• tracking/review-notebook.md
• tracking/storyline-architecture.md if available
• tracking/report-storyboard.md or tracking/presentation-storyboard.md if available
• key processed inputs referenced by claims

Core outcome

Produce a consistency audit that identifies contradictions, stale references, and weakly supported claims.

Required outputs

1. tracking/evidence-consistency-report.md
2. tracking/open-questions.md updates for unresolved claim checks
3. tracking/decision-log.md updates for accepted risk decisions

Audit checks

• claim-to-source traceability
• source supersession validity
• contradictory statements across artifacts
• unsupported or weakly supported claims
• version/date mismatch risks

Quality gate

Apply references/quality-standard.md before finalizing outputs.

Working materials discipline

• keep audit findings in tracking/evidence-consistency-report.md
• keep unresolved contradictions in tracking/open-questions.md
• keep accepted residual risks in tracking/decision-log.md

Back-iteration loop

1. run first-pass consistency audit
2. re-check after storyline/storyboard revisions
3. confirm contradictions are resolved or explicitly risk-accepted
4. refresh outputs and unresolved items before handoff

Do not

• rewrite storyline content without recording rationale
• silently drop contradictory evidence
• treat unresolved gaps as resolved