competitor-teardown

The fragment is potentially suspicious due to its download-execute installation pattern from an external domain and reliance on an external CLI for core functionality. While the described capabilities (data gathering, screenshots, reports) align with competitive teardown activities, the installation method creates a non-trivial supply-chain risk if pinning/verification is not robust. Recommend treating this as SUSPICIOUS with a preference toward BENIGN_ONLY_WITH_STRICT_VERIFICATION: require pinned hashes or signatures for the installer, use a trusted, auditable registry, and verify all external dependencies before execution. If the installer cannot be pinned or audited, avoid auto-install flows and require manual installation steps. Data flows themselves (data gathering from public sources) are normal for competitive analysis, but the network transfer to external CLI domains and the download-execute pattern warrant elevated scrutiny.