Design Evaluation & Audit

Read This First
Design Review Workflow
Path Selection Menu
Quick Reference
Guardrails

Read This First

What This Skill Does

This skill provides systematic evaluation tools for assessing existing designs against cognitive science principles. It gives you repeatable checklists, scoring rubrics, and prioritized fix recommendations.

Core principle: Good evaluation is systematic, not subjective — every dimension gets checked, every finding gets severity-classified, every fix gets prioritized.

Why It Matters

Common problems this addresses:

Design reviews that miss critical issues because they rely on gut feeling
Teams disagreeing on what to fix first without objective framework
Usability problems shipping because no one checked systematically
Visualizations that mislead because integrity was never audited

How this helps:

Covers all cognitive dimensions (visibility, hierarchy, chunking, memory, feedback, consistency, scanning, simplicity)
Scores visualizations on 4 independent criteria (Clarity, Efficiency, Integrity, Aesthetics)
Classifies findings by severity (CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW)
Produces actionable fix recommendations with clear priority order

When to Use This Skill

Use this skill when:

✓ Conducting design reviews or critiques
✓ Evaluating designs for cognitive alignment before iteration
✓ Quality assurance before launch or publication
✓ Diagnosing why a design "feels off"
✓ Choosing between design alternatives with objective criteria
✓ Auditing data visualizations for quality

Do NOT use for:

✗ Creating new designs from scratch (use cognitive-design)
✗ Learning cognitive theory (use cognitive-design Path 1)
✗ Detecting misleading visualizations (use cognitive-fallacies-guard)
✗ Technical implementation (coding, tooling)

Design Review Workflow

Time: 30-90 minutes depending on scope

Copy this checklist and track your progress:

Design Evaluation Progress:
- [ ] Step 1: Systematic Assessment
- [ ] Step 2: Visualization Quality Audit (if applicable)
- [ ] Step 3: Severity Classification & Prioritization
- [ ] Step 4: Fix Recommendations

Step 1: Systematic Assessment

Apply the Cognitive Design Checklist across all 8 dimensions: Visibility, Visual Hierarchy, Chunking, Simplicity, Memory Support, Feedback, Consistency, Scanning Patterns. Check every item. Record pass/fail for each dimension with specific evidence.

Resource: Cognitive Design Checklist

Step 2: Visualization Quality Audit (if applicable)

If the design includes data visualizations, apply the 4-Criteria Visualization Audit. Score each criterion 1-5: Clarity, Efficiency, Integrity, Aesthetics. Calculate average and identify weakest dimension.

Resource: Visualization Audit Framework

Step 3: Severity Classification & Prioritization

Classify every finding by severity:

CRITICAL: Integrity violations, accessibility failures, users cannot complete core tasks. Fix immediately.
HIGH: Clarity/efficiency issues preventing use, missing feedback for critical actions, working memory overload (>10 ungrouped items). Fix before launch.
MEDIUM: Suboptimal patterns, aesthetic issues, minor inconsistencies. Fix in next iteration.
LOW: Minor optimizations, polish items. Fix when convenient.

Priority rule: Fix foundation-first — perception before coherence, integrity before aesthetics, critical before high.

Step 4: Fix Recommendations

For each finding, document:

What is wrong — specific description with evidence
Why it matters — which cognitive principle is violated
How to fix — concrete, actionable recommendation
Expected outcome — what improves after the fix
Effort estimate — quick fix (minutes), moderate (hours), significant (days)

Verify fixes don't harm other dimensions.

Path Selection Menu

Path 1: Run Cognitive Design Checklist

Choose this when: Evaluating any interface, layout, content page, form, or general design.

What you'll get: Pass/fail across 8 cognitive dimensions, test methods, common failures, severity-classified findings.

Time: 20-40 minutes

→ Go to Cognitive Design Checklist

Path 2: Run Visualization Audit

Choose this when: Evaluating data visualizations — charts, graphs, dashboards, infographics.

What you'll get: 1-5 scores on Clarity, Efficiency, Integrity, Aesthetics with pass/fail threshold.

Time: 15-30 minutes per visualization

→ Go to Visualization Audit Framework

Path 3: Combined Review

Choose this when: Comprehensive review covering both interface elements and data visualizations.

Process: Run Cognitive Checklist first, then Visualization Audit on each data component, merge findings, produce unified fix list.

Time: 45-90 minutes

→ Start with Cognitive Checklist, then Visualization Audit

Quick Reference

3-Question Rapid Check

1. Attention — "Is it obvious what to look at first?"

If NO: hierarchy and visibility issues

2. Memory — "Is the user required to remember anything that could be shown?"

If NO: memory support and chunking issues

3. Clarity — "Can someone unfamiliar understand in 5 seconds?"

If NO: simplicity and comprehension issues

All YES = likely cognitively sound. Any NO = run full checklist on the failing area.

Guardrails

This skill does NOT: Create designs, teach theory, provide domain guidance, replace user testing, or cover full accessibility compliance.

This skill DOES: Provide systematic evaluation against cognitive principles, classify findings by severity, produce prioritized fix recommendations, and score visualization quality.

design-evaluation-audit