dependency-audit

[Skill Scanner] Backtick command substitution detected All findings: [HIGH] command_injection: Backtick command substitution detected (CI003) [AITech 9.1.4] [HIGH] command_injection: Backtick command substitution detected (CI003) [AITech 9.1.4] This skill appears to be a legitimate dependency security, license, and supply-chain auditing tool whose scripts and behaviors match the stated purpose. There are no direct signs of malware (no obfuscation, no credential exfiltration, no external unknown domains). However, it has moderate supply-chain and operational risks: unpinned global installs (npm/pip), use of npx, automatic modification of .git/hooks, and a shared cache that may broaden data exposure. These are common for audit tooling but warrant caution: pin tool versions, avoid global installs where possible, require explicit consent before installing hooks, and limit cache sharing scope. Overall: useful but with moderate supply-chain risk if used without review. LLM verification: Report 2 provides a clearer, more structured blueprint for dependency-audit workflows but still contains high-risk patterns (unpinned external tool installs, broad automation hooks, cross-skill caches). The content is not obviously malicious, but deployment must enforce provenance checks, pinned tool versions, restricted scopes, and explicit user approvals to mitigate supply-chain risks. Recommend tightening install provenance, adding integrity verification (hashes/signatures), pinning tool vers