propose-hypotheses
Pass
Audited by Gen Agent Trust Hub on Sep 15, 2026
Risk Level: SAFEINDIRECT_PROMPT_INJECTIONCOMMAND_EXECUTION
Full Analysis
- [INDIRECT_PROMPT_INJECTION]: The skill interpolates untrusted user data into prompts sent to sub-agents, which could allow an attacker to influence agent behavior through the input data.
- Ingestion points: User-provided strings for
$ARGUMENTS(used in Steps 1b, 2, and 8) and input gathered via<get from user>(Step 4) are placed directly into the prompts forfpf-agentinstances. - Boundary markers: There are no delimiters (such as XML tags or triple quotes) or specific instructions for the agent to treat the user input as passive data rather than instructions.
- Capability inventory: The workflow utilizes sub-agents with the ability to read/write files and execute task-specific logic from local markdown files. The main agent has shell execution capabilities.
- Sanitization: The skill does not perform any validation, filtering, or escaping of the user-supplied input before interpolation.
- [COMMAND_EXECUTION]: The skill uses shell commands to manage the local environment.
- Evidence: Step 1a utilizes
mkdir -pandtouchto initialize a hidden directory structure (.fpf/) used to maintain the framework's state. While these specific commands are benign, they demonstrate that the skill environment supports shell command execution.
Audit Metadata