skills/pawbytes/skill-suites/paw-ps-publish-ready-check

paw-ps-publish-ready-check

Installation
SKILL.md

Publish Ready Check

Overview

A rigorous quality evaluation workflow that determines whether a product meets the threshold for production, publication, or sale. This workflow protects the suite from overclaiming readiness by applying clear quality bars rather than superficial approval.

Args: Accepts --headless / -H for non-interactive execution.

Output: Readiness report (HTML), gap analysis, final verdict with fix list if applicable.


Pipeline

Stage 1: Load Bundle

Load ./references/01-load-bundle.md

Gather the packaged product bundle and locate all relevant standards and context files. Establish what type of product is being evaluated and which standards apply.

Progression: Proceed when product bundle is located and product type is identified.

Stage 2: Assess Quality

Load ./references/02-assess-quality.md

Apply quality standards systematically across all dimensions: functionality, completeness, clarity, usability, and documentation. Score each dimension against defined criteria.

Progression: Proceed when all quality dimensions have been assessed and scored.

Stage 3: Check Gaps

Load ./references/03-check-gaps.md

Identify what specifically blocks release. Classify gaps as critical (must fix), important (should fix), or minor (nice to have). Generate actionable fix list.

Progression: Proceed when all gaps are documented with severity classification.

Stage 4: Generate Verdict

Load ./references/04-generate-verdict.md

Make final determination: production-ready, publish-ready, sellable-ready, or not-ready. Apply the appropriate threshold based on the target readiness level.

Progression: Complete when verdict is issued and documented.


On Activation

  1. Determine the product workspace root: {project-root}/.pawbytes/prodig-suites/
  2. Identify active product from .pawbytes/prodig-suites/active-product.md if it exists
  3. If no active product and not in headless mode, prompt user to specify:
    • Product slug (which product to evaluate)
    • Target readiness level (production / publish / sellable)
  4. Begin pipeline at Stage 1

Readiness Levels

Level Definition Quality Bar
Production-ready Complete, functional, usable by intended audience Core functionality works, documentation adequate, no critical bugs
Publish-ready Formatted, polished, ready for publication platform Production-ready + professional presentation, platform requirements met
Sellable-ready Complete, polished, has all selling assets Publish-ready + marketing assets, pricing, support materials

Hierarchy: Sellable-ready requires publish-ready, which requires production-ready.


Input Sources

Source File Path Purpose
Product Bundle .pawbytes/prodig-suites/products/{product-slug}/bundle/ Packaged product files
Output Standards .pawbytes/prodig-suites/memory/paw-ps-sidecar/curated/output-standards.md Quality criteria
Product Context .pawbytes/prodig-suites/products/{product-slug}/product-context.md Product type and requirements
Product Brief .pawbytes/prodig-suites/products/{product-slug}/product-brief.md Scope and promises
Product Decisions .pawbytes/prodig-suites/products/{product-slug}/product-decisions.md Prior decisions

Minimum Requirement: Product bundle must exist. Standards may be loaded from references if not in workspace.


Output Structure

.pawbytes/prodig-suites/products/{product-slug}/
├── readiness-report.html         # Structured assessment (HTML)
├── readiness-report.md           # Plain text version
├── gap-analysis.md               # Detailed gap breakdown
├── fix-list.md                   # Actionable fixes (if not ready)
└── product-decisions.md          # Appended verdict

Daily log entry at:

.pawbytes/prodig-suites/memory/paw-ps-sidecar/daily/YYYY-MM-DD.md

Reference Lookup Protocol

  1. Read ./references/readiness-criteria.csv — lightweight index of criteria by product type
  2. Match product type to relevant criteria rows
  3. Apply matched criteria during Stage 2 assessment
  4. Reference full standards from ./references/frameworks/ only when needed

Output Contract

Every execution delivers:

  • Action type: Readiness evaluation
  • Verdict: production-ready / publish-ready / sellable-ready / not-ready
  • Files saved:
    • readiness-report.html — Structured assessment
    • readiness-report.md — Plain text version
    • gap-analysis.md — Gap breakdown
    • fix-list.md — (If not ready) Actionable fixes
  • Recommendations: Next steps based on verdict
  • File saved to: .pawbytes/prodig-suites/products/{product-slug}/

Headless Mode

When invoked with --headless or -H:

  1. Attempt to read active product from .pawbytes/prodig-suites/active-product.md
  2. If not found, scan for most recently modified product workspace
  3. Default target readiness level to publish-ready unless specified via args
  4. Execute all stages without prompts
  5. Document any assumptions in the report
  6. Exit with status code:
    • 0: Ready (verdict matches target)
    • 1: Not ready (gaps exist)
    • 2: Error (inputs missing)

Quality Gates

Stage Gate Condition
Load Bundle Product bundle located, product type identified
Assess Quality All quality dimensions scored
Check Gaps All gaps documented with severity
Generate Verdict Verdict issued with justification

Non-Negotiables

This workflow must apply clear quality bars, not superficial approval:

  1. No rubber-stamping — Every verdict must be justified with evidence
  2. Gap visibility — All blocking issues documented, none hidden
  3. Honest assessment — Better to delay release than ship broken products
  4. User clarity — Fix list must be actionable and specific
  5. Standards matter — Apply the criteria, don't lower the bar

Escalation Routes

Signal Routes To Why
Quality issues found paw-ps-agent-product-builder Coordinate fixes with specialists
Standards unclear paw-ps-strategist Clarify quality requirements
Multiple products to check paw-ps-agent-product-builder Batch coordination
Weekly Installs
19
GitHub Stars
25
First Seen
4 days ago