Diagnosing SDK health

When a user asks about PostHog SDK versions, outdated SDKs, or whether they should upgrade, use the pre-digested SDK Doctor report rather than reasoning about versions yourself. The backend applies smart-semver rules (grace periods, minor-count thresholds, age-based detection), traffic-percentage thresholds, and provides user-facing copy that matches the SDK Doctor UI exactly.

Available tools

Tool	Purpose
posthog:sdk-doctor-get	Returns a structured health report plus UI-matching copy and drill-in URLs per SDK/version.
posthog:execute-sql	(Optional) Run a sql_query from the report to show events captured by a specific outdated version.

Workflow

Step 1 — Invoke the tool

posthog:sdk-doctor-get
{}

Pass force_refresh: true only when the user explicitly asks for fresh data — by default the report uses a Redis cache that's refreshed every 12 hours.

Step 2 — Read the top-level summary

{
  "overall_health": "healthy" | "needs_attention",
  "health": "success" | "warning" | "danger",
  "needs_updating_count": 0,
  "team_sdk_count": 0,
  "sdks": [ /* per-SDK assessments */ ]
}

Lead with the headline:

• overall_health: healthy — everything's current; say so and stop.
• health: warning — some SDKs outdated but less than half of the project's SDKs. Flag as upgrade recommendations.
• health: danger — majority of team SDKs are outdated. Treat as urgent.

Step 3 — Surface the banner text(s) verbatim

Each SDK's banners array contains zero or more sentences that match the SDK Doctor UI's "Time for an update!" alert exactly, e.g.:

Version 7.0.0 of the Python SDK has captured more than 10% of events in the last 7 days.

Quote these verbatim. They're what the user already sees (or would see) in the UI — rewording creates drift between agent and product copy.

Step 4 — Report per-SDK findings

For each entry in sdks, surface:

• readable_name (e.g. Python, Node.js, Web) — use this in prose, not the raw lib
• latest_version
• severity (none / warning / danger) — use this to group or color findings

Group by severity (danger first, then warning, then none). Skip SDKs with needs_updating: false unless the user explicitly asked about the full state.

Step 5 — Per-version drill-down (when the user wants detail)

Each SDK's releases array has per-version rows. Each row includes UI-matching copy and ready-to-use links:

• status_reason — badge tooltip text that closely matches the UI (e.g. "Released 5 months ago. Upgrade recommended.", "You have the latest available. Click 'Releases ↗' above to check for any since.", or "Released 2 months ago. Upgrading is a good idea, but it's not urgent yet."). Quote directly. Caveat: the relative-age segment ("5 months ago" etc.) is computed with Python's humanize.naturaltime on the backend and JavaScript's dayjs().fromNow() in the browser, and the two libraries have different thresholds at some boundaries (e.g. humanize says "30 days ago" where dayjs says "a month ago"; humanize says "4 months ago" at 148 days where dayjs says "5 months ago"). The overall template is identical; the age phrasing may be one threshold off. If a user cites an exact age from the UI that doesn't match, don't "correct" them — the UI is showing dayjs output and both are internally consistent.
• released_ago — human-readable relative age (e.g. "5 months ago") — same humanize-vs-dayjs caveat as above.
• is_outdated, is_old, is_current_or_newer — booleans if you need to branch
• sql_query — complete SQL statement to see the last 50 events captured by this version. Suggest it as a copy-paste snippet OR pass it to posthog:execute-sql to drill in.
• activity_page_url — relative path (starts with /project/<id>/) to the Activity > Explore page pre-filtered to this lib + version. Combine with the user's PostHog host (e.g. us.posthog.com) for a clickable link.

Step 6 — Link to the UI

Always close with a link to the SDK Doctor page: /project/<project_id>/health/sdk-doctor. The UI shows per-row event counts, last-event timestamps, release notes, and SDK docs links — more than the tool response includes.

Interpreting severity

The backend applies these rules (you don't need to re-check them):

• Grace period: versions released within the last 7 days (14 days for web) are never flagged, even if major versions behind.
• Minor-version rule: flag if 3+ minors behind OR > 180 days old.
• Major-version rule: always flag if a major version behind (outside grace period).
• Patch-version rule: never flagged — patch differences are noise.
• Age rule (separate "old" flag): desktop SDKs flagged at > 16 weeks old, mobile at

  24 weeks old (mobile is more lenient — users don't auto-update apps).

• Traffic threshold: an outdated version handling ≥10% of events (≥20% for web) surfaces as a traffic alert even if a newer version is also in use. Mobile SDKs are excluded from traffic alerts.
• Overall severity: danger when half or more of the project's SDKs are outdated, warning when some are outdated but not majority.

Copy-faithfulness

These response fields are user-facing UI copy — quote them verbatim, don't reword:

• banners[] — top-level "Time for an update!" alert text. Byte-for-byte match with UI.
• releases[].status_reason — per-version badge tooltip text. Template matches the UI, but the relative-age phrasing ("5 months ago" etc.) can be one boundary threshold off because the backend uses humanize and the UI uses dayjs. See Step 5 caveat.
• readable_name — human-readable SDK name. Byte-for-byte match with UI.

reason (per-SDK) is a programmatic summary meant for ranking/filtering, not for quoting to users. Prefer banners[] and status_reason for user-visible output.

Handling empty or errored drill-in fields

If sql_query or activity_page_url comes back as an empty string for a particular release, the backend sanitizer rejected the lib_version as potentially unsafe to interpolate (e.g. it contained quote characters or whitespace). When this happens:

• Surface it — tell the user "the recorded SDK version string doesn't look safe to interpolate into a query, so I can't build a drill-in link for it." This is a signal worth noting (it could indicate instrumentation tampering or a library bug).
• Do NOT retry — calling the tool again won't change the result.
• Do NOT patch — don't rewrite the version or guess at a safe substitute and pipe that into posthog:execute-sql. That would defeat the sanitizer.

Similarly, if you pass sql_query to posthog:execute-sql and it errors, surface the error verbatim rather than rewriting the query. The query template is a verbatim mirror of what the SDK Doctor UI uses — if the UI's SQL wouldn't run, something else is wrong.

Do not wrap, truncate, or modify sql_query in any way before passing to posthog:execute-sql. No SELECT * FROM (<sql_query>) LIMIT 10, no adding WHERE clauses, no changing the ORDER BY, no dropping columns. The query is the verbatim mirror — if you need something different, build a fresh query from scratch with the user's help, don't derive it from sql_query.

Deferring to documentation for "why is it still outdated?" questions

When the user expresses confusion about an old SDK version still producing events after they believed it was updated — phrasings like "I thought I updated", "we already upgraded", "we deployed the new version but…", "why are users still on the old SDK?", or any variation of "why isn't it gone?" — do not improvise a list of causes. Point them to the canonical docs page instead:

https://posthog.com/docs/sdk-doctor/keeping-sdks-current

That page is the product team's source of truth on why versions persist (HTML snippet pinning, lockfiles in separate apps, CDN or browser caching, service workers, build/deploy issues) and what to do about each one (auto vs. manual update paths per SDK). It has diagrams, product-specific language, and will stay up to date as the guidance evolves — your improvised version will drift.

Suggested response shape:

That's a common question with a few possible causes — cached bundles, pinned snippet versions, lockfiles in separate apps, service workers, build/deploy issues, etc. Rather than guess which one's biting you, have a look at Keeping SDKs current — it walks through each cause and the fix. Once you've skimmed it, I can help you narrow it down for your setup (e.g. by pulling the activity events for the outdated version to see whether it's one app/domain/subpath or spread across everything).

The trigger is intent, not content. Defer whenever the user expresses surprise or confusion about persistence ("still", "thought I updated", "why haven't users upgraded", "why is the old one still there"), even when the tool response technically contains the version's age, reason, or traffic breakdown. The docs page exists because the literal data doesn't answer why, just what.

When NOT to defer

Do not send the user to the docs page when:

• The question is about a specific field in the response — e.g. "what does is_old mean?" or "how is severity calculated?" — answer directly using the report fields or the "Interpreting severity" rules below.
• The user is asking for the raw data (events, versions in use, counts, persons) — pull it via the report or posthog:execute-sql and present it.
• The user has already read the page and is asking a specific follow-up — answer directly or pull data to help narrow things down.

Tips

• If team_sdk_count is 0, the project isn't sending events with SDK metadata. Suggest checking that posthog-js (or another SDK) is actually installed and capturing events.
• The report is per-project. If the user asks about multiple projects, invoke the tool once per project (after switching project context via posthog:switch-project).
• The tool is read-only. No side effects, no rate limits, safe to call anytime.
• For "show me the events from this outdated version" requests, you have three options, ordered from most to least interactive:
  1. Render a clickable link from activity_page_url — user explores in PostHog UI.
  2. Pass sql_query to posthog:execute-sql and summarize the result inline.
  3. Quote the sql_query as a copy-paste snippet.

Phrasing the drill-in offer

When you offer to open activity_page_url or run sql_query, describe what the user will see in terms of the SDK being old, not the page or person. The data is about the customer's end-users' events captured while an old SDK is loaded — the old thing is the SDK, not the page or person.

• Good: "Want me to pull up the events captured by this old SDK so you can see which pages on your site are still loading it, and which end-users are hitting them?"
• Good: "I can show you which URLs on the site are still serving the outdated SDK and who's generating events from them."
• Avoid: "Want to see which pages/persons are still on the old version?" — pages don't run SDK versions; visitors of pages do. This phrasing makes the user think the old thing is the page or the person, which is wrong.
• Avoid for web / server SDKs: "which users are on the old SDK" — users don't install these; the customer's deployed app/site does. For mobile SDKs (posthog-ios, posthog-android, posthog-flutter, posthog-react-native), though, "users who haven't updated the app" IS accurate — the SDK ships embedded in the app binary and users control the update by updating the app. So the rule flips for mobile: phrasings like "end-users still running an older app version" or "users who haven't updated to the latest release" are correct for mobile drill-ins.