doc-consistency-reviewer

Pass

Audited by Gen Agent Trust Hub on Mar 8, 2026

Risk Level: SAFEPROMPT_INJECTIONCOMMAND_EXECUTION
Full Analysis
  • [PROMPT_INJECTION]: The skill exhibits an indirect prompt injection attack surface as it is designed to ingest and analyze untrusted data from local repositories.
  • Ingestion points: The skill reads README.md, docs/**/*.md, and contract files like OpenAPI/proto/GraphQL schemas as identified in SKILL.md and references/checklist.md.
  • Boundary markers: There are no explicit instructions to use delimiters or ignore embedded instructions within the ingested content, increasing the risk that the agent may follow instructions found within a project's documentation.
  • Capability inventory: The agent is given file system read access and is encouraged to use shell commands (e.g., searching or enumerating files) to perform its review.
  • Sanitization: No sanitization or validation mechanisms are mentioned to filter or escape content from external files.
  • [COMMAND_EXECUTION]: The audit checklist suggests that the agent attempt to run build and test commands to verify documentation accuracy.
  • Evidence: In references/checklist.md, under section 5 (运行方式与脚本), the checklist includes items such as "构建命令是否能成功执行?" (Can the build command be successfully executed?) and "测试命令是否与测试框架配置一致?" (Is the test command consistent with the framework configuration?).
  • Risk: If an agent attempts to execute commands (like npm install or make build) found in an untrusted or malicious repository, it could lead to the execution of arbitrary code or system compromise.
Audit Metadata
Risk Level
SAFE
Analyzed
Mar 8, 2026, 11:00 AM