Apqpppap
APQP/PPAP - Advanced Product Quality Planning & Production Part Approval
When to Activate This Skill
- "What APQP phase are we in?"
- "Create a phase gate checklist"
- "What PPAP elements are required?"
- "Generate a PSW for [part]"
- "Create a timing plan for [program]"
- "Track open issues for [launch]"
- "What's needed for PPAP Level [X]?"
- "Run readiness review"
Workflow Routing
| Workflow | Trigger | File |
|---|---|---|
| PhaseGate | "phase gate review", "gate checklist" | Workflows/PhaseGate.md |
| PpapPackage | "PPAP elements", "PPAP submission" | Workflows/PpapPackage.md |
| TimingPlan | "timing plan", "launch schedule" | Workflows/TimingPlan.md |
| OpenIssues | "open issues", "issue tracker" | Workflows/OpenIssues.md |
APQP Five Phases
Phase 1: Plan and Define Program
Purpose: Determine customer needs and expectations
Key Deliverables:
| Deliverable | Description | Owner |
|---|---|---|
| Voice of Customer | Customer requirements documented | Commercial |
| Business Plan | Program justification, capacity, investment | GM |
| Product/Process Assumptions | Initial feasibility assessment | Engineering |
| Product Assurance Plan | Quality objectives, reliability goals | Quality |
| Preliminary BOM | Initial bill of materials | Engineering |
| Preliminary Process Flow | High-level manufacturing concept | Mfg Eng |
| Preliminary Special Characteristics | Initial CC/SC identification | Quality |
| Management Support | Resource commitment | GM |
Gate 1 Criteria:
- Customer requirements documented and reviewed
- Feasibility assessment complete
- Resource plan approved
- Risk assessment performed
- Timing plan established
Phase 2: Product Design and Development
Purpose: Develop design to near-final form
Key Deliverables:
| Deliverable | Description | Owner |
|---|---|---|
| DFMEA | Design Failure Mode Effects Analysis | Design Eng |
| Design for Manufacturability (DFM) | Manufacturing input to design | Mfg Eng |
| Design Verification Plan | DVP&R creation | Design Eng |
| Engineering Drawings | Released with GD&T | Design Eng |
| Engineering Specifications | Material, performance specs | Design Eng |
| Prototype Build | Sample parts for validation | Multiple |
| Prototype Control Plan | Inspection plan for prototypes | Quality |
| Special Characteristics (Updated) | CC/SC finalized | Quality |
Gate 2 Criteria:
- DFMEA complete (RPN addressed)
- Design reviews completed
- Drawings released
- Prototypes built and validated
- Design verification results acceptable
- Special characteristics agreed with customer
Note: For contract manufacturing (MNMUK), Phase 2 is often customer-led. Focus on DFM feedback and prototype support.
Phase 3: Process Design and Development
Purpose: Develop manufacturing process
Key Deliverables:
| Deliverable | Description | Owner |
|---|---|---|
| Process Flow Diagram | All operations mapped | Mfg Eng |
| Floor Plan Layout | Equipment and flow layout | Mfg Eng |
| Characteristics Matrix | Link characteristics to operations | Quality |
| PFMEA | Process Failure Mode Effects Analysis | Quality/Mfg Eng |
| Pre-Launch Control Plan | Enhanced control for validation | Quality |
| Process Instructions | Operator work instructions | Mfg Eng |
| MSA Plan | Measurement system analysis plan | Quality |
| Preliminary Process Capability Plan | Cpk study plan | Quality |
| Packaging Standards | Pack spec developed | Logistics |
| Management Support (Updated) | Confirm resources | GM |
Gate 3 Criteria:
- Process flow complete and approved
- PFMEA complete (high RPNs addressed)
- Pre-launch control plan approved
- Work instructions drafted
- MSA plan established
- Tooling/equipment ordered or available
- Packaging spec approved
Phase 4: Product and Process Validation
Purpose: Validate manufacturing process
Key Deliverables:
| Deliverable | Description | Owner |
|---|---|---|
| Significant Production Run | PPAP quantity produced | Production |
| MSA Results | Gage R&R complete | Quality |
| Preliminary Process Capability | Initial Cpk/Ppk studies | Quality |
| Production Part Approval | PPAP package complete | Quality |
| Production Validation Testing | Performance testing | Quality |
| Production Control Plan | Final control plan | Quality |
| Quality Planning Sign-Off | Team approval | Cross-functional |
| PSW | Part Submission Warrant | Quality |
Gate 4 Criteria:
- Significant production run complete
- MSA acceptable (<10% GR&R for CC, <30% for SC)
- Process capability acceptable (Ppk ≥1.67 for CC, ≥1.33 for SC)
- PPAP package complete per customer level
- Customer approval (PSW signed)
- Production control plan implemented
- Operators trained
Phase 5: Feedback, Assessment and Corrective Action
Purpose: Continuous improvement during production
Key Activities:
| Activity | Description | Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| Variation Reduction | Reduce process variability | Ongoing |
| Customer Satisfaction | Monitor complaints, returns | Monthly |
| Delivery Performance | OTD tracking | Weekly |
| Lessons Learned | Capture and share | Per program |
| Control Plan Updates | Based on experience | As needed |
| PFMEA Updates | Based on field issues | As needed |
Ongoing Requirements:
- Customer complaints tracked and resolved
- Process capability maintained
- Control plans current
- Lessons learned documented
- Continuous improvement projects active
PPAP Submission Levels
| Level | Requirements | When Used |
|---|---|---|
| Level 1 | PSW and Appearance Approval Report only | Customer trusts supplier |
| Level 2 | PSW with product samples and limited data | Reduced documentation |
| Level 3 | PSW with product samples and complete data | Default |
| Level 4 | PSW with complete data (no samples) | Customer-specific |
| Level 5 | PSW with product samples and complete data at supplier site | Customer review on-site |
MNMUK Default: Level 3 unless customer specifies otherwise.
PPAP 18 Elements
Element Checklist
| # | Element | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Design Records | R | S | S | * | R | Engineering |
| 2 | Authorized Engineering Change Documents | R | S | S | * | R | Engineering |
| 3 | Customer Engineering Approval | R | R | S | * | R | Commercial |
| 4 | Design FMEA | R | R | S | * | R | Engineering |
| 5 | Process Flow Diagram | R | R | S | * | R | Mfg Eng |
| 6 | Process FMEA | R | R | S | * | R | Quality |
| 7 | Control Plan | R | R | S | * | R | Quality |
| 8 | Measurement System Analysis | R | R | S | * | R | Quality |
| 9 | Dimensional Results | R | S | S | * | R | Quality |
| 10 | Material, Performance Test Results | R | S | S | * | R | Quality |
| 11 | Initial Process Studies | R | R | S | * | R | Quality |
| 12 | Qualified Laboratory Documentation | R | S | S | * | R | Quality |
| 13 | Appearance Approval Report (AAR) | S | S | S | * | R | Quality |
| 14 | Sample Production Parts | R | S | S | R | R | Quality |
| 15 | Master Sample | R | R | S | * | R | Quality |
| 16 | Checking Aids | R | R | S | * | R | Quality |
| 17 | Customer-Specific Requirements | R | R | S | * | R | Quality |
| 18 | Part Submission Warrant (PSW) | S | S | S | S | S | Quality |
Legend: S = Submit to customer | R = Retain at supplier | * = Retain and submit on request
Element Details
Element 1: Design Records
- Released engineering drawings
- CAD data if applicable
- Current revision level
- All engineering specifications referenced
Element 2: Authorized Engineering Change Documents
- ECNs (Engineering Change Notices)
- Deviations approved by customer
- Temporary deviations with expiry dates
Element 3: Customer Engineering Approval
- Evidence of customer approval for design
- Typically for proprietary designs
- Not required if customer-owned design
Element 4: Design FMEA (DFMEA)
- Covers design failure modes
- Often customer responsibility for contract manufacturing
- MNMUK may not have access if design is proprietary
Element 5: Process Flow Diagram
- All operations including rework/inspection
- Material flow indicated
- Must match Control Plan operations
Element 6: Process FMEA (PFMEA)
- All process failure modes
- Current controls documented
- RPN/AP action items closed
- Special characteristics identified
- Reference: Load Pfmea skill
Element 7: Control Plan
- Matches PFMEA and process flow
- All special characteristics controlled
- Appropriate sample sizes and frequencies
- Reaction plans defined
- Reference: Load Controlplan skill
Element 8: Measurement System Analysis (MSA)
- Gage R&R for all variable gages
- Attribute agreement for attribute checks
- Acceptance: <10% for CC, <30% for SC
- Reference: Load Msa skill
Element 9: Dimensional Results
- All drawing dimensions measured
- Sample size typically n=3-5 parts
- Include layout inspection report
- Mark CC/SC results
Element 10: Material, Performance Test Results
- Material certifications
- Performance test results (DVP&R)
- Third-party test reports if required
- Traceability to material lots
Element 11: Initial Process Studies
- Capability studies (Ppk/Cpk)
- Minimum 30 parts, 300 readings for SPC
- Acceptance: Ppk ≥1.67 (CC), ≥1.33 (SC)
- Reference: Load Spc skill
Element 12: Qualified Laboratory Documentation
- Scope of lab accreditation
- ISO/IEC 17025 scope if applicable
- Third-party lab certifications
Element 13: Appearance Approval Report (AAR)
- Required for appearance items only
- Color, grain, texture approval
- Customer-signed AAR form
Element 14: Sample Production Parts
- Parts from significant production run
- Quantity per customer requirement (typically 3-10)
- Representative of normal production
Element 15: Master Sample
- Retained production sample
- Same as submitted samples
- Stored per retention requirements
Element 16: Checking Aids
- Custom gages, fixtures, templates
- Calibrated and identified
- Match Control Plan references
Element 17: Customer-Specific Requirements
- OEM-specific PPAP requirements
- May include additional forms/checklists
- Check customer portal/manual
Element 18: Part Submission Warrant (PSW)
- Summary of PPAP submission
- Weight, material declaration
- Customer-specific markings
- Authorized signatures
PSW Generation Guide
Required Information
# Part Submission Warrant
## Part Information
| Field | Value |
|-------|-------|
| Part Number | [Customer P/N] |
| Part Name | [Description] |
| Drawing Number | [Dwg #] |
| Drawing Rev | [Rev Level] |
| Customer | [Customer Name] |
| Buyer/Code | [Buyer Name/Code] |
## Supplier Information
| Field | Value |
|-------|-------|
| Supplier Name | Multimatic Niche Manufacturing UK |
| Supplier Code | [Customer-assigned code] |
| Address | [MNMUK Address] |
| Contact | [Quality Manager] |
| Phone/Email | [Contact details] |
## Submission Details
| Field | Value |
|-------|-------|
| PPAP Level | [1-5] |
| Submission Reason | [Initial, Change, Re-submission] |
| Engineering Change Level | [ECN #] |
| Purchase Order | [PO #] |
## Weight Declaration
| Measured | Specified | Difference |
|----------|-----------|------------|
| [Actual kg] | [Nominal kg] | [± kg] |
## Material Information
| Field | Value |
|-------|-------|
| Material | [Material spec] |
| Supplier | [Material supplier] |
| IMDS/MDS ID | [If required] |
## Special Characteristics
| Char | Drawing Ref | Result |
|------|-------------|--------|
| CC | [Zone/Ref] | PASS/FAIL |
| SC | [Zone/Ref] | PASS/FAIL |
## Submission Checklist
- [ ] All required elements per submission level included
- [ ] Capability requirements met
- [ ] No open issues or deviations
- [ ] Customer-specific requirements addressed
## Disposition (Customer Use)
[ ] Approved
[ ] Interim Approval (expiry: _______)
[ ] Rejected (reason: _______)
## Authorization
| Role | Signature | Date |
|------|-----------|------|
| Quality Manager | __________ | ________ |
| Customer Rep | __________ | ________ |
Timing Plan Elements
Standard Milestones
| Milestone | APQP Phase | Typical Timing |
|---|---|---|
| Program Kick-Off | 1 | T-24 weeks |
| Design Release | 2 | T-18 weeks |
| Tooling Order | 2 | T-16 weeks |
| Process Design Complete | 3 | T-12 weeks |
| Tooling Receive | 3 | T-10 weeks |
| First Article | 3 | T-8 weeks |
| PPAP Run | 4 | T-6 weeks |
| PPAP Submission | 4 | T-4 weeks |
| Customer Approval | 4 | T-2 weeks |
| SOP (Start of Production) | 5 | T-0 |
MNMUK Program Phases
| Phase | Duration | Key Activities |
|---|---|---|
| Quotation | 1-2 weeks | RFQ response, feasibility |
| Award | 1 week | PO receipt, kick-off |
| Planning | 2-3 weeks | APQP plan, team formation |
| Development | 4-8 weeks | Process design, tooling |
| Validation | 2-4 weeks | PPAP run, capability |
| Approval | 1-2 weeks | PPAP submission, PSW |
| Launch | 1-2 weeks | Production ramp-up |
Open Issues Management
Issue Categories
| Category | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Design | Drawing/specification issues | GD&T clarification needed |
| Process | Manufacturing capability | Cpk below target |
| Tooling | Equipment/fixture issues | Tool modification required |
| Quality | Inspection/testing gaps | MSA fail, need new gage |
| Supply | Material/supplier issues | Long lead material |
| Commercial | Contract/pricing issues | Scope change |
Issue Status
| Status | Definition | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Open | Issue identified, not resolved | Assign owner, target date |
| In Progress | Work underway | Track to completion |
| Pending | Waiting on external input | Follow up required |
| Closed | Issue resolved | Document resolution |
| Escalated | Risk to timing/quality | Management attention |
Issue Tracking Format
## Open Issues Log
| # | Issue | Category | Owner | Target | Status | Notes |
|---|-------|----------|-------|--------|--------|-------|
| 1 | [Description] | [Cat] | [Name] | [Date] | [Status] | [Notes] |
Phase Gate Review Meeting
Agenda Format
-
Program Status (5 min)
- Timeline status (Green/Yellow/Red)
- Budget status
- Customer communication
-
Deliverable Review (20 min)
- Checklist walkthrough
- Evidence of completion
- Identify gaps
-
Risk Review (10 min)
- Open issues summary
- Top 3 risks
- Mitigation status
-
Gate Decision (5 min)
- Pass / Conditional Pass / Fail
- Actions if conditional
- Next gate schedule
Gate Decision Criteria
| Decision | Criteria | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Pass | All deliverables complete, no critical issues | Proceed to next phase |
| Conditional Pass | Minor items open, clear path to close | Proceed with tracking |
| Fail | Critical items incomplete, significant risk | Hold, develop recovery plan |
IATF 16949 Alignment
APQP/PPAP is a core requirement of IATF 16949 (Clause 8.3 - Design and Development).
MNMUK IATF 16949 Context
Certification Target: November 2027 Current Status: ISO 9001 Certified, upgrading to IATF 16949
Reference Documentation:
- Compliance Plan:
~/projects/work/docs/compliance/IATF16949_Compliance_Plan.md - Quality Manual:
~/projects/work/docs/work-instructions/QM-001_Quality_Manual.md
IATF Requirements Addressed by This Skill
| IATF Clause | Requirement | APQP/PPAP Coverage |
|---|---|---|
| 8.3.2.1 | Design and development planning (APQP) | Full 5-phase APQP |
| 8.3.3.1 | Product design inputs | Phase 1 & 2 deliverables |
| 8.3.3.2 | Manufacturing process design inputs | Phase 3 deliverables |
| 8.3.4.1 | Design outputs (DFMEA, Control Plan) | Phase 2-4 outputs |
| 8.3.5.2 | Manufacturing process validation | Phase 4 validation |
| 8.3.6.1 | Design and development changes | Re-submission triggers |
| 9.1.1.1 | Process capability monitoring | PPAP Element 11 |
Capability Requirements (per QM-001)
| Characteristic | Ppk Minimum | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Critical (CC) | ≥1.67 | Safety/regulatory impact |
| Significant (SC) | ≥1.33 | Fit/function impact |
| Standard | ≥1.00 | All other characteristics |
PMO Governance
APQP programs at MNMUK are managed through the Programme Management Office (PMO):
- Monthly IATF Steering Committee reviews program status
- Phase gate reviews align with IATF documentation requirements
- Lessons learned feed into quality system continuous improvement
Integration with Related Skills
PFMEA
PFMEA is PPAP Element 6:
- Required for all PPAP levels
- Must be complete before Gate 3
- High RPN items must be addressed
Load: read ~/.claude/skills/Pfmea/SKILL.md
Control Plan
Control Plan is PPAP Element 7:
- Pre-launch for Gate 3
- Production for Gate 4
- Must align with PFMEA
Load: read ~/.claude/skills/Controlplan/SKILL.md
MSA
MSA is PPAP Element 8:
- Plan at Gate 3
- Results at Gate 4
- All gages must pass
Load: read ~/.claude/skills/Msa/SKILL.md
SPC
Initial process studies are PPAP Element 11:
- Capability studies at Gate 4
- Cpk/Ppk targets must be met
Load: read ~/.claude/skills/Spc/SKILL.md
Internal Audit
APQP program audit requirements:
- Phase gate reviews documented
- PPAP records auditable
- Process effectiveness verified
Load: read ~/.claude/skills/Internalaudit/SKILL.md
Examples
Example 1: Check PPAP readiness
User: "What PPAP elements do I need for Level 3?"
→ Lists all 18 elements with Submit/Retain status
→ Highlights elements to submit
→ Notes MNMUK-specific considerations
Example 2: Run phase gate review
User: "Run Gate 3 checklist for the XYZ project"
→ Loads PhaseGate workflow
→ Walks through Phase 3 deliverables
→ Identifies gaps and assigns actions
Example 3: Generate PSW
User: "Create a PSW for part 12345"
→ Collects required information
→ Generates PSW document
→ Includes all declarations and checklists
Example 4: Track program timing
User: "What's the timeline for our new damper launch?"
→ Loads TimingPlan workflow
→ Creates milestone schedule
→ Identifies critical path items
Supplementary Resources
For detailed guidance:
read ~/.claude/skills/Apqpppap/CLAUDE.md
For templates:
ls ~/.claude/skills/Apqpppap/templates/
For phase gate checklists:
read ~/.claude/skills/Apqpppap/reference/gate-checklists.md
For PPAP element forms:
read ~/.claude/skills/Apqpppap/reference/ppap-forms.md