Build Trading Strategies

Quick Start

This skill generates complete, production-ready strategy code using AI. This is the most expensive tool in Robonet ($1-$4.50 per generation).

Load the tools first:

Use MCPSearch to select: mcp__workbench__create_strategy
Use MCPSearch to select: mcp__workbench__create_prediction_market_strategy

Basic usage:

create_strategy(
    strategy_name="RSIMeanReversion_M",
    description="Buy when RSI(14) < 30 and price at lower Bollinger Band (20,2).
                 Sell when RSI > 70 or price at middle Bollinger Band.
                 Stop loss at 2% below entry. Position size 90% of available margin."
)

Returns complete Python strategy code ready for backtesting.

When to use this skill:

• You have a clear strategy concept and want working code
• You've explored data and know what indicators/symbols to use
• You're ready to commit to expensive development ($1-$4.50)

When NOT to use this skill:

• You're still exploring ideas → Use design-trading-strategies first ($0.05-$1.00)
• You have existing code to improve → Use improve-trading-strategies ($0.50-$3.00)
• You haven't checked data availability → Use browse-robonet-data first (free-$0.001)

Available Tools (2)

create_strategy

Purpose: Generate complete crypto trading strategy code with AI

Parameters:

• strategy_name (required, string): Name following pattern {Name}_{RiskLevel}[_suffix]
  • Risk levels: H (high), M (medium), L (low)
  • Examples: "RSIMeanReversion_M", "MomentumBreakout_H_v2"
• description (required, string): Detailed requirements including:
  • Entry conditions (specific indicator values and thresholds)
  • Exit conditions (stop loss, take profit, trailing stops)
  • Position sizing (percentage of margin to use)
  • Risk management (max loss per trade)
  • Indicators to use (exact names from browse-robonet-data)
  • Timeframe context (5m scalping vs 1h swing trading)

Returns: Complete Python strategy code with:

• should_long() - Check if conditions met for long entry
• should_short() - Check if conditions met for short entry
• go_long() - Execute long entry with position sizing
• go_short() - Execute short entry with position sizing
• Optional methods: on_open_position(), update_position(), should_cancel_entry()

Pricing: Real LLM cost + margin (max $4.50)

• Typical cost: $1.00-$3.00 depending on complexity
• Most expensive tool in Robonet

Execution Time: ~30-60 seconds

Use when:

• Building new crypto perpetual trading strategy
• You have clear, detailed requirements
• You've verified indicators/symbols available (browse-robonet-data)
• Ready to commit to expensive operation

create_prediction_market_strategy

Purpose: Generate Polymarket strategy code with YES/NO token trading logic

Parameters:

• strategy_name (required, string): Name following same pattern as create_strategy
• description (required, string): Detailed requirements for YES/NO token logic:
  • Conditions for buying YES tokens (probability thresholds)
  • Conditions for buying NO tokens
  • Exit criteria (profit targets, time-based exits)
  • Position sizing (percentage per market)
  • Market selection criteria (categories, liquidity requirements)

Returns: Complete Python strategy code with:

• should_buy_yes() - Check if conditions met for YES token entry
• should_buy_no() - Check if conditions met for NO token entry
• go_yes() - Execute YES token purchase with sizing
• go_no() - Execute NO token purchase with sizing
• Optional methods: should_sell_yes(), should_sell_no(), on_market_resolution()

Pricing: Real LLM cost + margin (max $4.50)

• Typical cost: $1.00-$3.00

Execution Time: ~30-60 seconds

Use when:

• Building Polymarket prediction market strategies
• Trading on real-world events (politics, economics, sports)
• Want YES/NO token exposure based on probability analysis

Core Concepts

Jesse Framework Structure

All crypto strategies must implement these required methods:

class MyStrategy(Strategy):
    def should_long(self) -> bool:
        """Check if all conditions are met for long entry"""
        # Return True to signal long entry opportunity
        # Called every candle

    def should_short(self) -> bool:
        """Check if all conditions are met for short entry"""
        # Return True to signal short entry opportunity
        # Called every candle

    def go_long(self):
        """Execute long entry with position sizing"""
        # Calculate position size (qty)
        # Place buy order
        # Set stop loss and take profit in on_open_position()

    def go_short(self):
        """Execute short entry with position sizing"""
        # Calculate position size (qty)
        # Place sell order
        # Set stop loss and take profit in on_open_position()

Optional but recommended methods:

    def on_open_position(self, order):
        """Set stop loss and take profit after entry"""
        # Called when position opens
        # Set self.stop_loss and self.take_profit

    def update_position(self):
        """Update position (trailing stops, etc.)"""
        # Called every candle while in position
        # Modify stop loss for trailing stops

    def should_cancel_entry(self) -> bool:
        """Cancel unfilled entry orders"""
        # Return True to cancel pending entry order

Strategy Naming Convention

Follow this pattern: {Name}_{RiskLevel}[_suffix]

Risk Levels:

• H (High): Aggressive strategies, high leverage, tight stops, >20% drawdown acceptable
• M (Medium): Balanced strategies, moderate leverage, standard stops, 10-20% drawdown
• L (Low): Conservative strategies, low leverage, wide stops, <10% drawdown

Examples:

• RSIMeanReversion_M - Base strategy, medium risk
• MomentumBreakout_H_optimized - After optimization, high risk
• TrendFollower_L_allora - With Allora ML enhancement, low risk
• BollingerBands_M_v2 - Version 2 of strategy

Why naming matters:

• Helps organize strategies by risk profile
• Clear versioning (_v2, _v3) tracks evolution
• Suffixes (_optimized, _allora) indicate enhancements
• Consistent naming enables easy filtering and comparison

Position Sizing Patterns

Recommended position sizing: 85-95% of available margin

Common approaches:

1. Fixed percentage (simple, predictable):

def go_long(self):
    qty = utils.size_to_qty(self.balance * 0.90, self.price)
    self.buy = qty, self.price

2. Volatility-based (adaptive to market conditions):

def go_long(self):
    atr = ta.atr(self.candles, period=14)
    # Reduce size in high volatility
    size_multiplier = 0.90 if atr < self.price * 0.02 else 0.70
    qty = utils.size_to_qty(self.balance * size_multiplier, self.price)
    self.buy = qty, self.price

3. Risk-based (size based on stop loss distance):

def go_long(self):
    atr = ta.atr(self.candles, period=14)
    stop_distance = atr * 2  # Stop at 2× ATR
    # Risk 2% of balance per trade
    risk_amount = self.balance * 0.02
    qty = risk_amount / stop_distance
    self.buy = qty, self.price

Best practice: Specify position sizing approach in description when creating strategy

Risk Management Requirements

Every strategy should include:

1. Stop Loss (mandatory):

def on_open_position(self, order):
    atr = ta.atr(self.candles, period=14)
    # Stop at 2× ATR below entry (long) or above entry (short)
    self.stop_loss = qty, self.price - (atr * 2)  # Long
    # or
    self.stop_loss = qty, self.price + (atr * 2)  # Short

2. Take Profit (recommended):

def on_open_position(self, order):
    atr = ta.atr(self.candles, period=14)
    # Target at 3× ATR (risk/reward = 1.5)
    self.take_profit = qty, self.price + (atr * 3)  # Long

3. Position sizing (see above)

Red flags (avoid these):

• No stop loss (unlimited downside)
• Stop loss too tight (<0.5% from entry) - will be stopped out by noise
• Stop loss too wide (>5% from entry) - excessive risk per trade
• Position size >95% of margin - insufficient buffer for margin calls
• No take profit - positions may give back gains

Available Indicators

170+ technical indicators via jesse.indicators:

Use exact names when describing strategy requirements:

Momentum (16 indicators):

• RSI, MACD, Stochastic, ADX, CCI, MFI, ROC, Williams %R, etc.

Trend (12 indicators):

• EMA, SMA, DEMA, TEMA, WMA, Supertrend, Parabolic SAR, VWAP, HMA, etc.

Volatility (8 indicators):

• Bollinger Bands, ATR, Keltner Channels, Donchian Channels, Standard Deviation, etc.

Volume (10 indicators):

• OBV, Volume Profile, Chaikin Money Flow, etc.

How to find indicators:

(Use browse-robonet-data skill)
get_all_technical_indicators(category="momentum")

In strategy description, use exact names: ✓ "Use RSI with period 14" ✓ "Use Bollinger Bands with period 20, std 2" ✗ "Use relative strength" (ambiguous) ✗ "Use BB" (unclear abbreviation)

Best Practices

Cost Management

This is the most expensive tool ($1-$4.50). Minimize waste:

Before using create_strategy:

1. ✅ Browse data with browse-robonet-data (verify symbols/indicators available)
2. ✅ Optionally generate ideas with design-trading-strategies ($0.05-$1.00 exploration)
3. ✅ Have detailed requirements written out
4. ✅ Understand Jesse framework basics

Avoid these costly mistakes:

• ❌ Creating strategy without checking indicator availability → Wasted $2.50
• ❌ Vague description ("build a good BTC strategy") → Poor results, need to regenerate
• ❌ Unclear requirements → Code doesn't match expectations, wasted generation
• ❌ Not specifying risk management → Need to regenerate with stops/sizing

Cost-saving pattern:

1. browse-robonet-data ($0.001) → Verify resources
2. design-trading-strategies ($0.30) → Explore 3 ideas
3. Pick best idea and refine description
4. create_strategy ($2.50) → Generate once, correctly
Total: $2.80 with high success rate

vs.

1. create_strategy ($2.50) → Vague requirements
2. Doesn't work, try again ($2.50)
3. Still not right ($2.50)
Total: $7.50 with frustration

Writing Effective Descriptions

Anatomy of a good description:

Entry Conditions:
- Specific indicator with exact parameters
- Exact thresholds
- Multiple conditions with AND/OR logic

Exit Conditions:
- Stop loss method and distance
- Take profit method and target
- Trailing stop if applicable

Position Sizing:
- Percentage of margin to use
- Or risk-based sizing method

Risk Management:
- Maximum loss per trade
- Any position limits

Context:
- Timeframe (5m, 1h, 4h, 1d)
- Market regime (trending, ranging)

Example of GOOD description:

"RSI Mean Reversion strategy for BTC-USDT on 1h timeframe.

ENTRY (Long):
- RSI(14) < 30 (oversold)
- Price touches lower Bollinger Band (20-period, 2 std dev)
- Confirm with volume: current volume > 1.2× 20-period average

EXIT (Long):
- Take profit: Price reaches middle Bollinger Band
- Stop loss: 2% below entry price
- Trailing stop: Once profit >3%, trail stop at 1.5% below highest price

POSITION SIZING:
- Use 90% of available margin per trade
- Single position at a time (no pyramiding)

RISK MANAGEMENT:
- Maximum loss: 2% of account per trade
- No new trades if in drawdown >10%"

Example of BAD description:

"Build a profitable BTC strategy using RSI and Bollinger Bands"

Problems:

• No entry conditions specified (what RSI value?)
• No exit conditions (when to close?)
• No position sizing (how much to risk?)
• No timeframe (1m? 1d?)
• Too vague → Will require regeneration

Validation Checklist

After strategy is generated, verify code includes:

• All required methods (should_long, should_short, go_long, go_short)
• Stop loss logic (in on_open_position or go_long/go_short)
• Take profit logic (recommended)
• Position sizing (qty calculation in go_long/go_short)
• Valid indicator calls (e.g., ta.rsi(self.candles, period=14))
• Proper entry/exit conditions matching description
• No syntax errors (code is runnable)
• Indicator parameters are reasonable (not over-optimized)

If validation fails:

• Use improve-trading-strategies skill to fix issues ($0.50-$3.00)
• Cheaper than regenerating with create_strategy ($1-$4.50)

Timeframe Considerations

Match strategy logic to timeframe:

Scalping (1m-5m):

• Tight stops (0.2-0.5%)
• Quick exits (minutes to hours)
• High-frequency indicators (short periods)
• Focus on execution and fees

Intraday (15m-1h):

• Moderate stops (0.5-2%)
• Hold hours to 1 day
• Standard indicator periods (14, 20, 50)
• Balance between frequency and noise

Swing Trading (4h-1d):

• Wide stops (2-5%)
• Hold days to weeks
• Longer indicator periods (50, 100, 200)
• Focus on larger trends

Specify timeframe in description:

"For 1h timeframe..." (helps AI tune indicator parameters appropriately)

Common Workflows

Workflow 1: Build from Scratch

Goal: Create new strategy from concept

1. Explore data (use browse-robonet-data):
   get_all_symbols() → Choose BTC-USDT
   get_all_technical_indicators(category="momentum") → Pick RSI
   get_all_technical_indicators(category="volatility") → Pick Bollinger Bands

2. Optional: Generate ideas (use design-trading-strategies):
   generate_ideas(strategy_count=3) → Get concepts
   Pick best concept as starting point

3. Write detailed description:
   - Entry: RSI < 30 AND price at lower BB
   - Exit: Price at middle BB OR stop loss 2%
   - Sizing: 90% margin
   - Timeframe: 1h

4. Create strategy:
   create_strategy(
       strategy_name="RSIMeanReversion_M",
       description="[detailed description from step 3]"
   )

5. Validate generated code:
   - Check all required methods present
   - Verify indicators match description
   - Confirm risk management included

6. Test immediately (use test-trading-strategies):
   run_backtest(strategy_name="RSIMeanReversion_M", ...)

Cost: ~$2-4 total ($0.30 ideas + $2.50 creation + $0.001 test)

Workflow 2: Build from Idea

Goal: Transform AI-generated concept into working code

1. Generate ideas (use design-trading-strategies):
   generate_ideas(strategy_count=3)

   Idea #2: "Bollinger Band Breakout"
   Entry: Price breaks above upper BB with high volume
   Exit: Price returns to middle BB
   Uses: Bollinger Bands, Volume

2. Refine idea into detailed description:
   "Bollinger Band Breakout strategy for ETH-USDT on 4h timeframe.

   ENTRY (Long):
   - Price closes above upper Bollinger Band (20, 2)
   - Current volume > 1.5× 20-period average volume
   - ADX(14) > 25 (confirm trend strength)

   EXIT (Long):
   - Price closes below middle Bollinger Band
   - Or stop loss 3% below entry
   - Or take profit at 9% above entry (3:1 reward:risk)

   POSITION SIZING: 85% of margin
   RISK: Max 3% loss per trade"

3. Create strategy:
   create_strategy(
       strategy_name="BollingerBreakout_H",
       description="[detailed description from step 2]"
   )

4. Test and validate:
   run_backtest(strategy_name="BollingerBreakout_H", ...)

Cost: ~$3 ($0.30 ideas + $2.50 creation + $0.001 test)

Workflow 3: Build Prediction Market Strategy

Goal: Create Polymarket YES/NO token trading strategy

1. Browse prediction markets (use browse-robonet-data):
   get_data_availability(data_type="polymarket")
   → See available markets

2. Analyze market data:
   get_prediction_market_data(condition_id="...")
   → Study YES/NO token price history

3. Write detailed description:
   "Polymarket probability arbitrage strategy for crypto_rolling markets.

   BUY YES TOKEN when:
   - YES token price < 0.40 (implied 40% probability)
   - Market has >$10k volume (sufficient liquidity)
   - Time to resolution > 2 hours (avoid last-minute volatility)

   BUY NO TOKEN when:
   - NO token price < 0.40 (YES price > 0.60)
   - Same liquidity and time criteria

   EXIT:
   - Sell when price reaches 0.55 (15% profit target)
   - Or hold until market resolution
   - Stop loss: Sell if price drops to 0.25 (37.5% loss)

   POSITION SIZING: 5% of capital per market
   MAX POSITIONS: 10 simultaneous markets"

4. Create prediction market strategy:
   create_prediction_market_strategy(
       strategy_name="PolymarketArbitrage_M",
       description="[detailed description from step 3]"
   )

5. Test on historical markets:
   run_prediction_market_backtest(...)

Cost: ~$2.50 + $0.001 test = $2.501

Advanced Usage

Multi-Timeframe Strategies

Describe higher timeframe context in strategy requirements:

"ETH-USDT swing trading strategy on 1h timeframe with 4h trend filter.

HIGHER TIMEFRAME (4h):
- Only take long trades when 4h EMA(50) is rising
- Only take short trades when 4h EMA(50) is falling

ENTRY TIMEFRAME (1h):
- [standard entry conditions on 1h]
..."

AI will generate code that checks higher timeframe conditions.

Complex Entry Logic

Specify precise logic for multiple conditions:

"Entry requires ALL of these conditions (AND logic):
1. RSI(14) < 30
2. Price < Lower Bollinger Band (20, 2)
3. MACD histogram positive (bullish divergence)
4. Volume > 1.3× average

OR entry if these alternative conditions met:
1. Price makes higher low
2. RSI makes higher low (bullish divergence)
3. Volume surge (>2× average)"

AI can handle complex multi-condition logic if clearly specified.

Dynamic Position Sizing

Specify adaptive sizing in description:

"Position sizing based on volatility:
- When ATR(14) < 2% of price: Use 95% margin (low volatility)
- When ATR between 2-4%: Use 85% margin (normal)
- When ATR > 4%: Use 70% margin (high volatility)

This reduces risk during volatile periods."

Troubleshooting

"Generated Code Has Errors"

Issue: Strategy code doesn't run or has syntax errors

Solutions:

• Use improve-trading-strategies skill with refine_strategy to fix errors
• Cheaper than regenerating ($0.50-$3.00 vs $1-$4.50)
• Specify exact error message in refine description

"Strategy Doesn't Match Description"

Issue: Generated logic differs from what you requested

Solutions:

• Description may have been ambiguous
• Use improve-trading-strategies skill to refine specific parts
• For major mismatch, may need to regenerate with clearer description

"Indicators Not Available"

Issue: Strategy uses indicators that don't exist in Jesse

Solutions:

• Should have used browse-robonet-data first to verify indicators
• Use refine_strategy to replace with valid indicators
• Check indicator spelling (RSI not rsi, MACD not macd)

"Strategy Too Complex"

Issue: Generated code is overly complicated with 8+ indicators

Solutions:

• Simplify description (request fewer indicators)
• Use refine_strategy to remove unnecessary complexity
• Complex strategies often overfit and perform poorly

"No Risk Management Included"

Issue: Generated code lacks stop loss or position sizing

Solutions:

• Description must explicitly request risk management
• Use refine_strategy to add stop loss and sizing
• Always specify: "Include stop loss at X% and position size of Y%"

Next Steps

After building a strategy:

Test the strategy (CRITICAL - do this next):

• Use test-trading-strategies skill to backtest
• Cost: $0.001 per backtest
• Validate performance before ANY further work
• Check: Sharpe >1.0, drawdown <20%, win rate 45-65%

Improve the strategy (if needed):

• Use improve-trading-strategies skill to refine code
• Cost: $0.50-$4.00 per operation
• Cheaper than regenerating from scratch
• Options: refine_strategy, optimize_strategy, enhance_with_allora

Deploy to production (only after thorough testing):

• Use deploy-live-trading skill (HIGH RISK)
• Cost: $0.50 deployment fee
• NEVER deploy without extensive backtesting (6+ months recommended)
• Start small, monitor closely

Summary

This skill provides AI-powered strategy code generation:

• 2 tools: create_strategy (crypto), create_prediction_market_strategy (Polymarket)
• Cost: $1.00-$4.50 per generation (MOST EXPENSIVE tool)
• Execution: 30-60 seconds
• Output: Production-ready Python code with Jesse framework structure

Core principle: This is expensive. Prepare thoroughly before using:

1. Browse data (verify resources available)
2. Optionally generate ideas (explore concepts cheaply)
3. Write detailed description (clear requirements)
4. Generate once, correctly
5. Test immediately

Critical warning: Generated code may have bugs or not match expectations. ALWAYS test with test-trading-strategies before deploying. NEVER deploy untested strategies to live trading.

Cost optimization: Spending 5 minutes preparing ($0-$0.30 exploration) saves dollars in wasted generations and improves success rate dramatically.