persuasion-cialdini-influence-design
Cialdini Influence Design
Use $ARGUMENTS as initial context.
When to use this skill
- Persuasive emails, pitches, proposals, and campaign messaging.
- Internal influence communications requiring buy-in.
- GTM or marketing copy that needs credible proof structures.
- Situations where persuasion must remain ethical and non-manipulative.
Required inputs
- Objective, audience, and desired action.
- Available proof points and constraints.
- Channel, tone, and execution timeline.
Workflow
- Define target behavior and decision context.
- Identify barriers, motivators, and decision criteria.
- Select 2-3 Cialdini principles that best match context.
- Build traceability matrix: principle -> evidence -> claim.
- Draft channel-specific message variants with clear CTA.
- Run ethical risk check and adjust risky framing.
Ask-first questions
Ask up to 3 questions before drafting:
- What action should the audience take and by when?
- Which proof points are verifiable today?
- What ethical or legal boundaries cannot be crossed?
Assumption policy
- If proof is incomplete, clearly mark assumptions and confidence.
- Do not use fabricated urgency, fake social proof, or inflated authority.
- State when claim strength exceeds evidence strength.
Output contract
Always produce these sections in order:
- Context
- Decision or Recommendation
- Analysis
- Risks
- Next Actions
- Assumptions
Guardrails
- Every persuasive claim must map to verifiable evidence.
- Keep emotional framing proportional to factual support.
- Include at least one trust-preserving alternative for skeptical audiences.
- Reject coercive language or misleading scarcity.
Resources
references/cialdini-principles.md- Principle selection and usage cues.references/ethical-guardrails.md- Non-manipulation and compliance checks.templates/persuasion-brief.md- Decision-ready persuasion template.examples/persuasion-cialdini-example.md- Golden example with proof mapping.
Keywords
persuasion, Cialdini, social proof, authority, reciprocity, scarcity, commitment, ethics
More from santos-sanz/lifeskills
pyramid-principle-structured-communication
Structure high-stakes communication with the Pyramid Principle. Use when preparing executive summaries, recommendations, decision memos, or storyline-driven updates that need a clear answer-first flow and defensible support.
52consulting-issue-tree-mece
Build MECE issue trees for complex business problems. Use when you need rigorous problem decomposition, branch prioritization, and a decision-ready analysis backlog.
49negotiation-voss-tactical-empathy
Prepare and run negotiations using tactical empathy and structured trade design. Use when handling high-stakes salary, vendor, contract, or scope discussions that require strategy-script separation, BATNA/ZOPA framing, and concession guardrails.
28high-agency
Apply George Mack's High Agency approach to founder and leadership execution. Use when ambiguity, blockers, stalled execution, impossible constraints, or cross-functional deadlock require ownership and rapid action.
20consulting-market-competition-analysis
Analyze market size and competitive dynamics with consulting-grade rigor. Use when decisions require TAM/SAM/SOM triangulation, competitor mapping, positioning implications, and uncertainty-aware recommendations.
20consulting-hypothesis-driven-80-20
Build hypothesis-driven workplans with explicit 80/20 prioritization. Use when rapid decision-making requires testing assumptions, ranking opportunities, and focusing on highest-leverage analyses.
19