vulture-strategy
🦅 VULTURE v2.0 — Long-Tail Momentum Rider
COMPLETE REWRITE from v1.0. v1.0 was a contrarian SM-exhaustion fader on 4 majors (BTC/ETH/SOL/HYPE) gated at MIN_4H_MOVE_PCT=3.0 — the combination was mathematically unreachable and produced 0 trades in 14+ days.
v2.0 is a totally different agent. Designed from the #1 Arena winner's playbook (3-week reigning Arena champion, 102 trades, 38.6% win rate, 6.15x profit factor, ~80% of profit from 6 trades out of 102, hold times 24h to 8 days).
Thesis
Small-cap Hyperliquid perps have thicker trader-count signal-to-noise ratios than the majors. When Smart Money concentration on a small cap ALIGNS with a fresh 4h price trend AND 15m velocity is accelerating, enter in the direction of the trend and hold it via the DSL tier curve for days, not hours.
Key insight: The Arena winner's asset universe (HEMI, WLD, MON, XPL, AIXBT, ARB) is a fleet-wide blind spot. No current Senpi predator scans small-cap alts — they're all locked to 4-12 majors or single assets. Vulture v2.0 fills the gap.
Philosophy (copied from Arena winner #1)
- Low win rate is fine (~38%) if winners are 5-10x bigger than losers
- Tight loss cuts via DSL dead_weight_cut (60 min)
- Long holds on winners via hard_timeout=10080 min (7 days)
- Moderate leverage (5-7x) — small caps can't handle 20x (slippage kills you on low-liquidity books)
- Signal-driven direction, NOT long-only bias. The Arena winner was long because April 2026 was a bullish regime, not because LONG is a rule. Vulture v2.0 takes SHORTs when signals support.
- Max 2 concurrent positions
Asset Universe (25 small/mid-caps)
HYPE, HEMI, WLD, MON, XPL, AIXBT, ARB, ASTER, POLYX, LDO,
APT, DYDX, ONDO, SUI, kBONK, kPEPE, TAO, GRASS, ZEC, LIT,
FARTCOIN, MORPHO, NEAR, INJ, AVAX, LINK, DOGE
Banned: BTC, ETH, SOL (handled by other predators). XYZ DEX assets (handled by Bald Eagle).
Entry Scoring
Hard gates (all must pass)
- Asset must be in TRACKED_ASSETS and not in BANNED_ASSETS
- SM direction must be LONG or SHORT (not neutral)
pct >= 3.0ANDtraders >= 15(signal validity)- 4h price ALIGNED with SM direction by at least 1% (momentum confirmation)
- 15m velocity
> 0.3(actively building, not flat)
Scoring contributors (max ~14 pts)
| Signal | Points |
|---|---|
| SM concentration ≥18% (HEAVY_FLOW) | +4 |
| SM concentration ≥12% (STRONG_FLOW) | +3 |
| SM concentration ≥7% (MODERATE_FLOW) | +2 |
| SM concentration ≥3% (LIGHT_FLOW) | +1 |
| 4h price aligned ≥8% (TREND_RUNNING) | +3 |
| 4h price aligned ≥4% (TREND_STRONG) | +2 |
| 4h price aligned ≥2% (TREND_BUILDING) | +1 |
| 15m velocity ≥3.0 (15M_EXPLOSIVE) | +3 |
| 15m velocity ≥1.0 (15M_STRONG) | +2 |
| 15m velocity ≥0.5 (15M_BUILDING) | +1 |
| ACCELERATING pattern (15m > 1h > 0) | +2 |
| 1h velocity ≥1.0 (1H_POSITIVE) | +1 |
| 4h contribution ≥2.0 (4H_CONTINUATION) | +1 |
| Trader count ≥50 (DEEP_DEPTH) | +1 |
| Move ≥15% in direction (LATE_ENTRY_PENALTY) | -3 |
| Move ≥12% in direction (MOVE_EXTENDED) | -2 |
MIN_SCORE: 7 — entry floor. The scoring dimensions (especially HEAVY_FLOW requiring ≥18% SM concentration) do the real quality work.
Conviction-Scaled Leverage
| Score | Leverage |
|---|---|
| ≥11 | 7x |
| ≥9 | 5x |
| ≥7 | 3x |
Capped at 7x because small-cap liquidity can't support 20x. Lemon can go 20x on BTC/ETH because slippage is <0.1%. Small caps can have 0.5%+ slippage per fill, which eats gains at 20x.
Exit (DSL)
The DSL tier curve is the single biggest difference from other Senpi predators. Winners need DAYS to develop. Arena winner #1 held HEMI for 8 days, WLD for 4 days, MON for 5 days.
| Mechanism | Value | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| hard_timeout | 10080 min (7 days) | Let momentum runners run a full week |
| dead_weight_cut | 60 min | Faster than Owl's 90, slower than Lemon's 20 (small-cap wick tolerance) |
| weak_peak_cut | 120 min @ 2% min | Catch fades that stalled |
| Phase 1 max_loss_pct | 20% | Wider than Lemon's 15%, tighter than Owl's 35% |
| Phase 1 retrace | 8% | Standard |
| Phase 1 breaches | 3 | Standard |
| Phase 2 tier 1 | 5% trigger → 20% lock | Capture first leg (Lemon-pattern learning) |
| Phase 2 tier 2 | 10% → 35% lock | |
| Phase 2 tier 3 | 20% → 55% lock | |
| Phase 2 tier 4 | 35% → 70% lock | |
| Phase 2 tier 5 | 50% → 80% lock | |
| Phase 2 tier 6 | 75% → 88% lock | |
| Phase 2 tier 7 | 100% → 92% lock | Infinite trail on massive winners |
Risk Management
| Rule | Value |
|---|---|
| Max positions | 2 concurrent |
| Max entries/day | 4 (dynamic, scales with P&L) |
| Per-asset cooldown | 240 min (4h sniper cadence) |
| Margin per position | 40% of account |
| Leverage range | 3-7x |
| Asset blocklist | BTC, ETH, SOL, all XYZ |
| Daily loss cap | HARD STOP at -25% drawdown |
Differences from Lemon
Both agents are "fleet alpha extractors" but via opposite philosophies:
| Dimension | Lemon v1.1 (Degen Fader) | Vulture v2.0 (Long-Tail Rider) |
|---|---|---|
| Asset universe | 12 majors | 25 small caps |
| Direction vs SM | Fades (counter-trade) | Follows (momentum) |
| Entry condition | SM high + 15m collapsing | SM high + 15m accelerating |
| Avg hold time | 235 min | 24h to 7 days |
| hard_timeout | 480 min | 10,080 min (21x longer) |
| dead_weight_cut | 20 min | 60 min |
| Max leverage | 20x (apex) | 7x (liquidity limit) |
| MIN_SCORE | 8 | 7 |
Both are bets on asymmetric payoff — low win rate + big winners / tiny losers — but Lemon bets on mean reversion of exhausted crowds while Vulture bets on continuation of small-cap trends.
Runtime Setup
Step 1: Install package files:
mkdir -p /data/workspace/skills/vulture-strategy/{config,scripts,state}
curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Senpi-ai/senpi-skills/main/vulture/runtime.yaml -o /data/workspace/skills/vulture-strategy/runtime.yaml
curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Senpi-ai/senpi-skills/main/vulture/SKILL.md -o /data/workspace/skills/vulture-strategy/SKILL.md
curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Senpi-ai/senpi-skills/main/vulture/config/vulture-config.json -o /data/workspace/skills/vulture-strategy/config/vulture-config.json
curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Senpi-ai/senpi-skills/main/vulture/scripts/vulture-scanner.py -o /data/workspace/skills/vulture-strategy/scripts/vulture-scanner.py
curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Senpi-ai/senpi-skills/main/vulture/scripts/vulture_config.py -o /data/workspace/skills/vulture-strategy/scripts/vulture_config.py
Step 2: Set strategy wallet and telegram chat:
sed -i 's/${WALLET_ADDRESS}/<STRATEGY_WALLET_ADDRESS>/' /data/workspace/skills/vulture-strategy/runtime.yaml
sed -i 's/${TELEGRAM_CHAT_ID}/<CHAT_ID>/' /data/workspace/skills/vulture-strategy/runtime.yaml
Step 3: Install runtime:
openclaw senpi runtime create --path /data/workspace/skills/vulture-strategy/runtime.yaml
openclaw senpi runtime list
Step 4: Create scanner cron (3-minute interval):
# In openclaw: create a cron scanning every 3 minutes
# Command: python3 /data/workspace/skills/vulture-strategy/scripts/vulture-scanner.py
Bootstrap Gate
On EVERY session start, verify:
- senpi-trading-runtime SKILL is loaded
- Senpi MCP is connected
- Runtime is installed (
openclaw senpi runtime list) - Scanner cron is active (3 min interval)
Send: "🦅 VULTURE v2.0 online. Long-Tail Momentum Rider. Riding small-cap trends. Silence = no momentum confluence."
Changelog
v2.0 (2026-04-15) — COMPLETE REWRITE
- Thesis flipped: contrarian fader → momentum rider
- Universe expanded: 4 majors → 25 small caps
- DSL hard_timeout: 360 min → 10,080 min (7 days)
- Leverage: 5-7x (unchanged, appropriate for small caps)
- MIN_4H_MOVE_PCT gate removed (was unreachable)
- New MIN_15M_VELOCITY=0.3 hard gate (actively-building confirmation)
- Max positions: 1 → 2
- Signal-driven direction (not bias)
- Based on Arena winner #1 3-week playbook
v1.0 (pre-2026-04-15)
- Initial release. Contrarian SM-exhaustion fader on 4 majors. 0 trades produced.
License
MIT — Built by Senpi (https://senpi.ai). Source: https://github.com/Senpi-ai/senpi-skills
Skill Attribution
When creating a strategy, include skill_name and skill_version in the call. See references/skill-attribution.md for details.