frontend-testing
Frontend Testing
Unlock reliable confidence fast: enable safe refactors by choosing the right test layer, making the app observable, and eliminating nondeterminism so failures are actionable.
Philosophy: Confidence Per Minute
Frontend tests fail for two reasons: the product is broken, or the test is lying. Your job is to maximize signal and minimize “test is lying”.
Before writing a test, ask:
- What user risk am I covering (money, progression, auth, data loss, “can’t start” crashes)?
- What’s the narrowest layer that catches this bug class (pure logic vs UI vs full browser)?
- What nondeterminism exists (time, RNG, async loading, network, animations, fonts, GPU)?
- What “ready” signal can I wait on besides
setTimeout? - What should a failure print/screenshot so it’s diagnosable in CI?
Core principles:
- Test the contract, not the implementation: assert stable user-meaningful outcomes and public seams.
- Prefer determinism over retries: make time/RNG/network controllable; remove flake at the source.
- Observe like a debugger: console errors, network failures, screenshots, and state dumps on failure.
- One critical flow first: a reliable smoke test beats 50 flaky tests.
Workflow Decision Tree
Pick the test type by the cheapest layer that provides the needed confidence:
- Unit tests (fastest): pure functions, reducers, validators, math, pathfinding, deterministic simulation steps.
- Component/integration tests (medium): UI behavior with mocked IO (React Testing Library / Vue Testing Library / Testing Library DOM).
- E2E tests (slowest, highest confidence): critical user flows across routing, storage, real bundling/runtime.
- Visual regression (specialized): layout/pixel regressions; for canvas/WebGL, only after locking determinism.
- A11y checks: great for DOM UIs; limited value for pure canvas unless you expose accessible DOM overlays.
Quick Start (Any Project)
- Define 1 smoke flow: “page loads → user can start → one key action works”.
- Choose runner:
- Prefer Playwright for browser E2E + screenshots.
- Prefer Testing Library for DOM component behavior.
- Prefer unit tests for logic you can run without a browser.
- Add a “ready” signal in the app (DOM marker, window flag, or game event) and wait on that.
- Fail loudly: treat console errors and failed requests as test failures.
- Stabilize: seed RNG, freeze time, fix viewport/DPR, disable animations, and remove network variability.
Playwright Patterns (Especially Useful For Games)
Use Playwright when you need “real browser” confidence:
- Drive input via mouse/keyboard/touch; treat the canvas like the user does.
- Add a test seam: expose a small, stable test API on
window(read-only state + a few commands). - Prefer
waitForFunction-style readiness over sleep; gate on “scene ready” / “assets loaded” / “first frame rendered”. - For screenshots: lock viewport, device scale factor, fonts, and animation timing.
- For 9-slice / canvas UI regressions: add a dedicated UI harness scene/page and assert via targeted screenshots (see
references/phaser-canvas-testing.md).
If using the Playwright MCP tools (browser automation inside Codex), follow the same mindset:
- Use
browser_console_messagesandbrowser_network_requeststo catch silent failures. - Use
browser_evaluateto assertwindow.__TEST__state and to set up deterministic mode. - Use
browser_take_screenshotfor visual assertions after determinism is enforced.
Reconnaissance-Then-Action (Borrowed From Real Debugging)
When a UI is dynamic, don’t guess selectors—recon first, then act:
Quick decision guide:
Task → Is it static HTML (no JS runtime needed)?
├─ Yes → read the HTML to find stable selectors/content, then automate
└─ No → treat as dynamic: run the app, wait for readiness, then inspect rendered state
- Navigate and wait for readiness:
- For many webapps: wait for a meaningful “loaded” element (preferred).
networkidlecan help for SPAs, but avoid it if the app uses websockets/polling.
- Capture evidence (what the user actually sees):
- screenshot (full page for DOM; targeted for canvas)
- console errors + failed requests
- Discover selectors from the rendered state:
- prefer role/text/label selectors over brittle CSS
- Execute actions using discovered selectors and re-check state.
Common pitfall:
❌ Inspect/interact before the app is ready.
✅ Wait on an explicit ready signal (DOM marker or window.__TEST__.ready), not a sleep.
Server Lifecycle Helper (Playwright E2E)
When the dev server isn’t already running, use the bundled helper as a black box:
- Run
python scripts/with_server.py --helpfirst. - Start one (or multiple) servers, wait for their ports, then run your test command.
Example:
python scripts/with_server.py --server "npm run dev" --port 5173 -- npm test
Flake Reduction Checklist
- Replace sleeps with explicit readiness conditions.
- Control time (
Date.now, timers), RNG, and animation loops. - Make network deterministic (mock, record/replay, or run against a seeded local backend).
- Eliminate “first-run” differences (asset caches, fonts) or warm them explicitly.
- Lock environment: viewport, DPR, locale/timezone, and rendering settings.
Anti-Patterns to Avoid
❌ Testing the wrong layer: E2E tests for pure logic. Better: unit tests for logic; reserve E2E for integration contracts.
❌ Testing implementation details: asserting DOM structure/classnames or internal engine objects. Better: assert user-meaningful outputs (text, navigation, score/HP changes) or a small stable test seam.
❌ Sleep-driven tests: wait 2s then click.
Better: wait on explicit readiness (DOM marker, event, window flag).
❌ Uncontrolled randomness: RNG/time-based behaviors in assertions. Better: seed RNG, freeze time, and assert stable invariants.
❌ Pixel snapshots without determinism (especially canvas/WebGL). Better: add deterministic mode first; then screenshot selectively.
❌ Snapshot explosion: hundreds of snapshots that no one can interpret. Better: keep snapshots targeted (critical screens); prefer specific assertions for behavior.
❌ Retries as a strategy: “just bump retries in CI”. Better: fix readiness and determinism; use retries only as temporary guardrails.
Variation Guidance (Prevent One-Size-Fits-All)
Vary the approach based on:
- UI type: DOM app vs canvas/WebGL game vs hybrid.
- Risk: core revenue/progression flows get E2E first; edge UI polish gets component tests.
- CI constraints: headless-only, limited GPU, slow CPUs, no audio devices.
- Test seam availability: if you can add a stable
window.__TEST__API, assert state; if not, stick to black-box input/output.
Remember
You can make almost any frontend (including canvas/WebGL games) testable by adding a tiny, stable seam for readiness + state. This skill is meant to empower creative, high-signal testing rather than cargo-cult checklists. Aim for tests that are boring to maintain: deterministic, explicit about readiness, and rich in failure evidence. One reliable smoke test is the foundation; everything else compounds from there.
Bundled Resources
Read these only when needed:
references/playwright-mcp-cheatsheet.md: patterns for using Playwright MCP tools for assertions, waiting, and diagnostics.references/phaser-canvas-testing.md: deterministic mode + hooks for Phaser/canvas/WebGL games.references/flake-reduction.md: deeper flake triage and stabilization tactics.
Use these scripts as black boxes (run --help first; don’t read source unless you must):
scripts/with_server.py: start/wait/stop one or more dev servers around a test command.scripts/imgdiff.py: lightweight screenshot diff helper (requirespip install pillow).