pr-review-fix
Installation
SKILL.md
PR Review & Fix
Systematically analyze open pull requests for CI failures, code review feedback, and code quality issues — then fix them efficiently.
When to use this skill
Use this skill when you need to:
- Check the status of all open PRs (CI, reviews, conflicts)
- Triage and fix CI build/test failures on PR branches
- Address code review feedback (reviewer comments, requested changes)
- Run a scheduled health check across all open PRs
- Fix multiple PRs in a single session without losing context
Do NOT use for:
- Creating new PRs or new features
- Merging PRs (that's a manual decision)
- General code refactoring unrelated to PR feedback
- Reviewing code as a reviewer (this skill is for responding to reviews)
Workflow
Phase 1 — Discovery
- Read
references/discovery.mdfor the full discovery procedure. - Fetch the list of open PRs from GitHub:
gh pr list --state open --json number,title,headRefName,statusCheckRollup,reviewDecision,mergeable --limit 30 - For each PR, classify its health status:
- 🔴 CI Failed — at least one required check failed
- 🟡 Changes Requested — reviewer left requested changes
- 🟢 Healthy — CI passing + approved or no review yet
- ⚪ Conflict — merge conflicts detected
Phase 2 — Triage
- Read
references/triage.mdfor prioritization rules. - Prioritize by severity: CI failures > review changes > conflicts.
- For each failing PR, identify root cause category:
- Build error — TypeScript/webpack compilation failure
- Test failure — vitest/jest test assertion or timeout
- Lint/type error — ESLint, type-check, or format issues
- Review feedback — code style, logic, security, or design concerns
- Present a summary table to the user before proceeding to fixes.
Phase 3 — Fix
- Read
references/fix-workflow.mdfor the fix procedure. - For each PR to fix (in priority order):
a. Stash current work:
git stashb. Check out the PR branch:git checkout -B <branch> github/<branch>c. Reproduce the issue locally (build, test, or lint) d. Apply the fix e. Verify locally: build → test → lint f. Commit with conventional-changelog format:fix(<scope>): 🔧 <description>g. Push:git push github <branch>h. Return to original branch:git checkout <original> && git stash pop - After all fixes, present a completion summary.
Phase 4 — Verify
- After pushing fixes, wait 1-2 minutes for CI to trigger.
- Check CI status for each fixed PR:
gh pr checks <number> - If CI still fails, loop back to Phase 3 for that PR.
Routing
| Task | Read |
|---|---|
| Discover and list open PR status | references/discovery.md |
| Prioritize which PRs to fix first | references/triage.md |
| Execute fixes on PR branches | references/fix-workflow.md |
| Understand project CI pipeline | references/ci-pipeline.md |
| Common fix patterns and recipes | references/fix-recipes.md |
Git safety rules
- Never force-push to a PR branch unless explicitly asked.
- Never amend commits that are already pushed.
- Always stash before switching branches.
- Always verify build + test locally before pushing.
- One commit per fix session — keep the diff reviewable.
Commit conventions
Follow the project's conventional-changelog format:
fix(<scope>): 🔧 <english description>
Where <scope> is the affected module (e.g., cloudrun, security, code-quality, test).
Minimum self-check
- Did you fetch the latest remote state before analyzing?
- Did you reproduce the failure locally before attempting a fix?
- Did you verify build + test pass after applying the fix?
- Did you switch back to the original branch after each fix?
- Did you present a clear summary of what was fixed and what remains?
Weekly Installs
2
Repository
tencentcloudbas…base-mcpGitHub Stars
987
First Seen
3 days ago
Security Audits
Installed on
amp2
cline2
opencode2
cursor2
kimi-cli2
warp2