disciplined-implementation
Fail
Audited by Gen Agent Trust Hub on Feb 16, 2026
Risk Level: HIGHCOMMAND_EXECUTIONREMOTE_CODE_EXECUTION
Full Analysis
- Indirect Prompt Injection (HIGH): The skill is designed to ingest and execute 'Approved Implementation Plans' and 'Research Documents' from external phases.
- Ingestion points: Requirements are read from Phase 1/2 documents.
- Boundary markers: No explicit delimiters or instructions to ignore embedded commands within the input plans are provided.
- Capability inventory: The skill performs file writes, git commits, and executes system commands via
cargo test,cargo clippy, andcargo audit. - Sanitization: No validation or sanitization of the external plan content is performed before it is used to generate and execute code. A malicious plan could embed instructions that result in unauthorized file access or data exfiltration during the 'Verification' loop.
- Dynamic Execution (HIGH): The core workflow involves the agent writing code and unit tests based on external input and then executing them.
- Evidence: The 'Implementation Workflow' and 'Test-First Implementation' sections explicitly instruct the agent to write code to pass tests and then run
cargo test. If the plan specifies a malicious test case, the agent will execute that arbitrary code on the host system. - Command Execution (MEDIUM): The skill makes extensive use of subprocess calls to tools like
gitandcargo. - Evidence: Instructions include
git commit,cargo test,cargo clippy, andcargo audit. While these are standard development tools, they are executed based on the state of the code generated from external plans.
Recommendations
- AI detected serious security threats
Audit Metadata