second-opinion
Audited by Socket on Feb 17, 2026
1 alert found:
Malware[Skill Scanner] Installation of third-party script detected All findings: [CRITICAL] command_injection: Installation of third-party script detected (SC006) [AITech 9.1.4] [CRITICAL] command_injection: Installation of third-party script detected (SC006) [AITech 9.1.4] The module accurately documents and implements an external-LLM-based 'second opinion' review workflow that reads git diffs and repository files and invokes Codex and/or Gemini CLIs. There is no direct evidence in the provided source that the code itself is malicious or obfuscated. However, this workflow poses moderate supply-chain and data-exfiltration risks: it will send unredacted repository content (including possible secrets and uncommitted changes) to third-party LLM services, and the Gemini --yolo flag enables model-driven extension actions without confirmation, which could cause unintended local effects. Recommendations: require explicit user consent before sending uncommitted or sensitive files; add automated secret scanning/redaction or at least a user-visible warning with examples of what may be sent; recommend pinned/published versions and integrity checks for CLI/extension installs; and treat Gemini --yolo usage as a high-risk operation requiring clear user opt-in. LLM verification: The skill's capabilities match its stated purpose (running external LLM CLIs to review diffs) but include high-risk operational choices: immediate execution without pre-checks and Gemini invocations with --yolo that auto-approve extensions. Those choices materially increase the chance that local files, credentials, or other sensitive data could be exfiltrated or that local commands could be executed without explicit user confirmation. There is no clear evidence of intentional malware or obfuscat