product-management
Product Operations Skill – Quick Reference
This skill turns Claude into an operator, not a lecturer.
Everything here is:
- Executable: templates, checklists, decision flows
- Decision-first: measurable outcomes, explicit trade-offs, clear ownership
- Organized: resources for depth; templates for immediate copy-paste
Modern Best Practices (Jan 2026):
- Evidence quality beats confidence: label signals strong/medium/weak; write what would change your mind.
- Outcomes > output: roadmaps are bets with measurable impact and guardrails, not feature inventories.
- Metrics must be defined (formula + timeframe + data source) to be actionable.
- Privacy, security, and accessibility are requirements, not afterthoughts.
- Hybrid decision loops: AI surfaces anomalies, patterns, and forecasts; humans apply context, ethics, and long-term strategy.
- Revenue ownership: Product now owns business outcomes (92% of PM leaders per 2025 State of PM Report).
- Portfolio diversification: 70% core products, 20% adjacent opportunities, 10% transformational bets.
- Optional: AI / Automation is allowed only when explicitly requested and policy-compliant.
When to Use This Skill
Claude should invoke this skill when the user asks to do real product work, such as:
- “Create / refine a PRD / spec / business case / 1-pager”
- “Turn this idea into a roadmap” / “Outcome roadmap for X”
- “Design a discovery plan / interview script / experiment plan”
- “Define success metrics / OKRs / metric tree”
- “Position this product against competitors”
- “Run a difficult conversation / feedback / 1:1 / negotiation”
- “Plan a product strategy / vision / opportunity assessment”
Claude should NOT use this skill for:
- Book summaries, philosophy, or general education
- Long case studies or storytelling
Quick Reference
| Task | Template | Domain | Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery interview | customer-interview-template.md |
Discovery | Interview script with Mom Test patterns |
| Opportunity mapping | opportunity-solution-tree.md |
Discovery | OST with outcomes, problems, solutions |
| Outcome roadmap | outcome-roadmap.md |
Roadmap | Now/Next/Later with outcomes and themes |
| OKR definition | okr-template.md |
Metrics | 1-3 objectives with 2-4 key results each |
| Product positioning | positioning-template.md |
Strategy | Competitive alternatives → value → segment |
| Product vision | product-vision-template.md |
Strategy | From→To narrative with 3-5 year horizon |
| 1:1 meeting | 1-1-template.md |
Leadership | Check-in, progress, blockers, growth |
| Post-incident debrief | a3-debrief.md |
Leadership | Intent vs actual, root cause, action items |
Decision Tree: Choosing the Right Workflow
User needs: [Product Work Type]
├─ Discovery / Validation?
│ ├─ Customer insights? → Customer interview template
│ ├─ Hypothesis testing? → Assumption test template
│ └─ Opportunity mapping? → Opportunity Solution Tree
│
├─ Strategy / Vision?
│ ├─ Long-term direction? → Product vision template
│ ├─ Market positioning? → Positioning template (Dunford)
│ ├─ Big opportunity? → Opportunity assessment
│ └─ Amazon-style spec? → PR/FAQ template
│
├─ Planning / Roadmap?
│ ├─ Outcome-driven? → Outcome roadmap (Now/Next/Later)
│ ├─ Theme-based? → Theme roadmap
│ └─ Metrics / OKRs? → Metric tree + OKR template
│
└─ Leadership / Team Ops?
├─ 1:1 meeting? → 1-1 template
├─ Giving feedback? → Feedback template (SBI model)
├─ Post-incident? → A3 debrief
└─ Negotiation? → Negotiation one-sheet (Voss)
Do / Avoid (Dec 2025)
Do
- Start from the decision: what are we deciding, by when, and with what evidence.
- Define metrics precisely (formula + timeframe + data source) and add guardrails.
- Use discovery to de-risk value before building; prioritize by evidence, not opinions.
- Write “match vs ignore” competitive decisions, not feature grids.
Avoid
- Roadmap theater (shipping lists) without outcomes and learning loops.
- Vanity KPIs (raw signups, impressions) without activation/retention definitions.
- “Build-first validation” (shipping MVPs without falsifiable hypotheses).
- Collecting customer data without purpose limitation, retention, and access controls.
What Good Looks Like
- Evidence: 5–10 real user touchpoints or equivalent primary data for material bets.
- Scope: clear non-goals and acceptance criteria that can be tested.
- Learning: post-launch review with metric deltas, guardrail impact, and next decision.
Optional: AI / Automation
Use only when explicitly requested and policy-compliant.
- PRD templates: ../docs-ai-prd/assets/prd/prd-template.md and ../docs-ai-prd/assets/prd/ai-prd-template.md
- AI system lifecycle: assets/ai/ai-lifecycle-template.md
- Agentic workflow docs: assets/ai/agentic-ai-orchestration.md
- AI product patterns: references/ai-product-patterns.md
Navigation
Resources
- references/discovery-best-practices.md
- references/roadmap-patterns.md
- references/delivery-best-practices.md
- references/strategy-patterns.md
- references/positioning-patterns.md
- references/data-product-best-practices.md
- references/interviewing-patterns.md
- references/metrics-best-practices.md
- references/leadership-decision-frameworks.md
- references/operational-guide.md
- data/sources.json
Templates
- Discovery: assets/discovery/customer-interview-template.md, assets/discovery/assumption-test-template.md, assets/discovery/opportunity-solution-tree.md
- Strategy/Vision: assets/strategy/product-vision-template.md, assets/strategy/opportunity-assessment.md, assets/strategy/positioning-template.md, assets/strategy/PRFAQ-template.md
- Data: assets/data/data-product-canvas.md
- Roadmaps: assets/roadmap/outcome-roadmap.md, assets/roadmap/theme-roadmap.md
- Metrics: assets/metrics/metric-tree.md, assets/metrics/okr-template.md
- Ops/Leadership: assets/ops/1-1-template.md, assets/ops/feedback-template.md, assets/ops/a3-debrief.md, assets/ops/negotiation-one-sheet.md
Related Skills
- ../docs-ai-prd/SKILL.md — PRD, stories, and prompt/playbook templates
- ../software-architecture-design/SKILL.md — System design guidance for specs and PRDs
- ../software-frontend/SKILL.md — UI implementation considerations for product specs
- ../software-backend/SKILL.md — Backend/API implications of product decisions
Operational Guide
See references/operational-guide.md for detailed patterns, template walkthroughs, example flows, and execution checklists. Keep SKILL.md as the navigation hub; use assets/ when producing artifacts.
External Resources
See data/sources.json for official frameworks (Lean Startup, OST, PR/FAQ, OKRs) and AI/LLM safety references.
Use the quick reference and decision tree above to choose a template, then follow the operational guide for depth.
Trend Awareness Protocol
IMPORTANT: When users ask recommendation questions about product management tools, frameworks, or practices, you MUST use WebSearch to check current trends before answering.
Trigger Conditions
- "What's the best tool for [roadmapping/product analytics/discovery]?"
- "What should I use for [OKRs/metrics/customer feedback]?"
- "What's the latest in product management?"
- "Current best practices for [discovery/roadmaps/prioritization]?"
- "Is [framework/tool] still relevant in 2026?"
- "[Linear] vs [Jira] vs [other]?" or "[Amplitude] vs [Mixpanel]?"
- "Best approach for [AI product management/agentic products]?"
Required Searches
- Search:
"product management best practices 2026" - Search:
"[specific tool] vs alternatives 2026" - Search:
"product management trends January 2026" - Search:
"[discovery/roadmap/OKR] frameworks 2026"
What to Report
After searching, provide:
- Current landscape: What PM tools/frameworks are popular NOW
- Emerging trends: New tools, methods, or patterns gaining traction
- Deprecated/declining: Frameworks/tools losing relevance
- Recommendation: Based on fresh data, not just static knowledge
Example Topics (verify with fresh search)
- Product management tools (Linear, Productboard, Notion, Coda)
- Analytics platforms (Amplitude, Mixpanel, PostHog)
- Discovery and research tools (Maze, UserTesting, Dovetail)
- Roadmapping approaches (outcome-based, theme-based, now/next/later)
- AI product management patterns
- Prioritization frameworks (RICE, ICE, opportunity scoring)
- OKR and metrics tools