skills/v112263/it-autonomos-spain/content-fact-check-article

content-fact-check-article

SKILL.md

Fact-Check Article

Perform thorough fact-checking of an article before publication. Verify all claims, numbers, deadlines, conditions, and legal references against authoritative official sources.

Input

$ARGUMENTS

The input should be a path to an article file (e.g., _includes/ru/tax-optimization/rent.md).

Instructions

Phase 1: Read and Extract Facts

  1. Read the article from the specified path

  2. Extract all verifiable claims, including:

    • Numbers: percentages, amounts, limits, thresholds (e.g., "IVA 21%", "315€/month", "60,000€ threshold")
    • Deadlines: filing dates, registration periods, waiting times (e.g., "quarterly by 20th", "within 30 days")
    • Conditions: eligibility requirements, prerequisites (e.g., "only for first-time autonomos", "requires 3 years of residence")
    • Legal references: laws, regulations, articles (e.g., "Ley 20/2007", "Art. 96 LIRPF")
    • Procedures: steps, requirements, document lists
    • Rates and calculations: tax rates, social security contributions, formulas
    • Official terminology: correct names of forms, institutions, programs
  3. Create a list of facts to verify with context from the article

Phase 2: Verify Against Official Sources

  1. Use WebSearch to verify each fact against authoritative sources:

    Primary sources (MUST use when relevant):

    • Agencia Tributaria (sede.agenciatributaria.gob.es) - taxes, IVA, IRPF, models
    • Seguridad Social (seg-social.es) - contributions, quotas, benefits
    • BOE (boe.es) - laws, royal decrees, official regulations
    • Ministerio de Trabajo - labor regulations
    • Banco de España - banking regulations

    Secondary sources (for additional context):

    • Official bank websites
    • Professional associations (colegios profesionales)
    • Recognized legal/tax advisory firms with cited sources
  2. For each fact, document:

    • The exact claim from the article
    • What the official source says
    • The URL of the source
    • Whether it matches, partially matches, or contradicts

Phase 3: Legal Verification

  1. For any legal references:

    • Verify the law/article number is correct
    • Check if it's still in force (not derogated or modified)
    • Confirm the interpretation in the article matches the legal text
    • Use BOE or official legal databases
  2. Check for outdated information:

    • Tax rates and limits often change annually
    • Social security contributions update yearly
    • Verify current year values, not historical ones

Phase 4: Generate Report

  1. Create a comprehensive fact-check report with the following structure:
## Fact-Check Report: [Article Name]

**Article path:** `[path]`
**Checked on:** [date]
**Total facts checked:** [number]

### Summary

- ✅ Verified: [number]
- ⚠️ Partial discrepancies: [number]
- ❌ Incorrect/outdated: [number]

---

### Detailed Results

#### ✅ Verified Facts

| Fact in Article | Verified Value | Source |
|-----------------|----------------|--------|
| IVA rate is 21% | 21% (general rate) | [Agencia Tributaria](url) |
| ... | ... | ... |

#### ⚠️ Partial Discrepancies

| Fact in Article | Official Source Says | Source | Comment |
|-----------------|---------------------|--------|---------|
| "Filing deadline is 20th" | "20th of month following quarter end" | [AT](url) | Missing detail about exceptions for weekends/holidays |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |

#### ❌ Incorrect or Outdated

| Fact in Article | Correct Information | Source | Recommended Action |
|-----------------|--------------------:|--------|-------------------|
| "Minimum base 294€" | "Minimum base 306€ in 2024" | [SS](url) | Update to current year value |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |

---

### Facts Unable to Verify

| Fact | Reason | Recommendation |
|------|--------|----------------|
| "In my experience, processing took 2 weeks" | Personal experience - cannot verify | Keep as personal anecdote, clearly marked |
| ... | ... | ... |

---

### Recommendations

1. [Specific action items based on findings]
2. ...

Verification Standards

What to Flag as ⚠️ Partial Discrepancy:

  • Minor differences in wording that don't change meaning
  • Missing details that could be helpful
  • Simplifications that omit edge cases
  • Rounding of numbers (e.g., "about 300€" when exact is 294.12€)

What to Flag as ❌ Incorrect:

  • Wrong numbers, rates, or percentages
  • Outdated information (old rates, repealed laws)
  • Incorrect deadlines
  • Wrong form numbers or procedure steps
  • Misinterpretation of legal requirements

Personal Experience Claims:

  • Mark as "Unable to verify - personal experience"
  • Don't flag as incorrect unless they contradict official requirements
  • Note if the experience seems atypical

Output

Present the complete fact-check report. Be thorough - check EVERY verifiable claim in the article. The goal is to ensure 100% accuracy before publication.

After the report, if there are any ⚠️ or ❌ items, provide a summary of recommended changes to the article.

Weekly Installs
1
GitHub Stars
223
First Seen
14 days ago
Installed on
amp1
cline1
opencode1
cursor1
continue1
kimi-cli1