startup-fundraising
SKILL.md
Startup Fundraising
Systematic framework for raising capital from pre-seed through growth stages.
Quick Start (Inputs)
Collect these inputs first (ask concise follow-ups if missing):
- Company basics: product, ICP, geo, stage
- Traction: revenue (MRR/ARR), growth, retention/NRR, pipeline
- Financials: runway, burn, gross margin, CAC/payback (if applicable)
- Raise: target amount, instrument (SAFE/note/equity), timeline, use of funds
- Constraints: legal counsel availability, current cap table + SAFEs/notes + option pool
Default Workflow
Use this sequence unless the user request is narrowly scoped:
- Decide raise vs bootstrap (objectives, timing, capital intensity).
- Size the round (18-24 months runway + milestone plan + buffer).
- Prepare materials (deck, model, data room, narrative, metrics definitions).
- Build investor list (stage/sector/check size/partner fit) and outreach cadence.
- Manage diligence (data room hygiene, references, compliance, QA on metrics).
- Negotiate/close (term sheet priorities, cap table + option pool modeling).
- Post-close ops (cap table updates, 409A, governance, investor updates).
Jump to these files when needed:
- Strategy:
assets/fundraising-plan.md - Deck:
assets/fundraising-deck-outline.md - Data room:
assets/data-room-checklist.md - Term sheet + diligence:
references/term-sheets-and-diligence.md - Cap table hygiene:
references/cap-table-management.md - Post-investment ops:
references/post-investment-operations.md
Modern Best Practices (Jan 2026)
- Burn multiple matters: Investors often screen efficiency via Net Burn / Net New ARR.
- Post-money SAFEs are common: Many pre-seed deals use post-money SAFEs (vs notes, pre-money SAFEs).
- Data room = product: Clean structure, version control, index document, 409A current.
- 8 due diligence areas: Beyond the deck - financial hygiene, unit economics, brand consistency, founder-market fit, digital reputation, customer validation, technical scalability, cap table hygiene.
- Milestone-based raises: Map every round to specific milestones and runway (best/base/worst).
Decision Tree: What Fundraising Help?
FUNDRAISING QUESTION
|-- "Should I raise?" -> Raise vs Bootstrap Analysis
|-- "How much to raise?" -> Round Sizing
|-- "What's my valuation?" -> Valuation Framework
|-- "How do I find investors?" -> Investor Targeting
|-- "How do I pitch?" -> Pitch Preparation
`-- "Full fundraising plan" -> COMPREHENSIVE STRATEGY
Fundraising Stage Overview
| Stage | Typical Raise | Valuation | Milestones to Raise |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-Seed | $250K-$1M | $2-5M | Idea, team, early prototype |
| Seed | $1-4M | $5-15M | MVP, early customers, PMF signals |
| Series A | $5-15M | $20-60M | PMF, $1-2M ARR, repeatable sales |
| Series B | $15-50M | $60-200M | Proven GTM, $5-15M ARR, unit economics |
| Series C+ | $50M+ | $200M+ | Scale, expansion, path to profitability |
What Investors Look For by Stage
| Stage | Primary Focus | Secondary Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-Seed | Team, market, vision | Early traction |
| Seed | Team, PMF signals, market | Early metrics |
| Series A | PMF proof, GTM, metrics | Team, market size |
| Series B | Growth efficiency, unit economics | Market expansion |
| Series C+ | Path to profitability, scale | Market leadership |
Should You Raise?
Raise vs Bootstrap Decision Matrix
| Factor | Raise If | Bootstrap If |
|---|---|---|
| Capital intensity | High upfront investment needed | Low capital needs |
| Market timing | Land grab opportunity | Steady market |
| Competition | Well-funded competitors | Fragmented market |
| Network value | Investors add strategic value | Execution-focused |
| Exit timeline | <7 year exit path | Long-term hold |
| Growth rate | 3x+ YoY possible | Steady growth fine |
Funding Types
| Type | Description | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| Equity | Sell ownership | High-growth, VC-backable |
| Post-money SAFE | Equity at fixed cap, post-investment | Common at pre-seed |
| Convertible Note | Debt that converts to equity | Bridge rounds |
| Debt (Venture) | Loan with warrants | Post-revenue, bridge |
| Revenue-Based | % of revenue | Predictable revenue |
| Grants | Non-dilutive | R&D, specific industries |
SAFE vs Convertible Note (2026)
| Feature | Post-money SAFE | Convertible Note |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-seed usage | Common | Less common |
| Interest | None | 2-8% annually |
| Maturity date | None | 12-24 months typical |
| Complexity | Simple (1-5 pages) | More complex (10+ pages) |
Why post-money SAFEs are common: Cleaner cap table modeling, predictable dilution, no debt features, and often faster to close than notes.
Round Sizing
Round Size = Monthly Burn x Runway Months + Buffer
Where:
- Runway: 18-24 months typical
- Buffer: 20-30% for unknowns
Milestone-Based Sizing
| Current Stage | Raise Enough To... |
|---|---|
| Pre-Seed | Reach Seed milestones (MVP, early customers) |
| Seed | Reach Series A milestones (PMF, $1-2M ARR) |
| Series A | Reach Series B milestones ($5-10M ARR) |
| Series B | Reach profitability or Series C ($20M+ ARR) |
Dilution Considerations
| Round | Typical Dilution | Running Total |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-Seed | 10-15% | 10-15% |
| Seed | 15-25% | 25-40% |
| Series A | 15-25% | 40-55% |
| Series B | 10-20% | 50-65% |
| Series C | 10-15% | 55-70% |
Rule of thumb: Keep 15-20% for option pool, founders retain >10% at exit.
Valuation Framework
Valuation Methods by Stage
| Stage | Method | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-Seed | Comp-based | Market x stage adjustment |
| Seed | Forward multiple | Projected ARR x 10-20x |
| Series A | ARR multiple | ARR x 15-50x |
| Series B+ | ARR multiple | ARR x 10-30x |
ARR Multiple Benchmarks (2025-2026)
| Growth Rate | Multiple Range |
|---|---|
| <50% YoY | 5-10x |
| 50-100% YoY | 10-20x |
| 100-200% YoY | 20-40x |
| >200% YoY | 40-100x |
Burn Multiple (2026 Key Metric)
The Burn Multiple is a common investor screening metric for efficiency.
Formula: Burn Multiple = Net Burn / Net New ARR
| Burn Multiple | Interpretation | Investor View |
|---|---|---|
| <1.0x | Highly efficient | Strong signal, rare |
| 1.0-1.5x | Efficient growth | Attractive |
| 1.5-2.0x | Moderate efficiency | Acceptable with justification |
| 2.0-3.0x | Inefficient | Yellow flag |
| >3.0x | Burning cash | Red flag, likely pass |
Investor Targeting
Investor Types
| Type | Check Size | Stage Focus | Value-Add |
|---|---|---|---|
| Angels | $25K-250K | Pre-Seed, Seed | Advice, intros |
| Syndicates | $100K-1M | Seed | Access to angels |
| Micro VC | $500K-2M | Pre-Seed, Seed | Hands-on help |
| Seed VC | $1-5M | Seed, Series A | Portfolio support |
| Multi-Stage VC | $5M+ | Series A+ | Resources, brand |
| Corporate VC | $2-20M | Series A+ | Strategic partnership |
| Growth Equity | $20M+ | Series B+ | Scale expertise |
Investor Research Checklist
| Dimension | Questions to Answer |
|---|---|
| Stage fit | Do they invest at your stage? |
| Sector fit | Do they invest in your space? |
| Check size | Does their check match your raise? |
| Portfolio | Any conflicts or synergies? |
| Recent activity | Are they actively deploying? |
| Partner | Who would be your partner? |
| Reputation | What do founders say? |
Building Investor List
| Source | How to Use |
|---|---|
| Crunchbase | Filter by stage, sector, recent deals |
| PitchBook | Comprehensive data |
| Partner research, warm intros | |
| AngelList | Angel and syndicate research |
| Signal NFX | Investor database |
| Portfolio founders | References and intros |
Pitch Preparation
Pitch Deck Structure (12-15 slides)
| Slide | Content | Goal |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Title | Company, tagline, contact | First impression |
| 2. Problem | Pain point, who has it | Establish need |
| 3. Solution | What you do, how it works | Show the answer |
| 4. Demo/Product | Screenshots, demo | Prove it's real |
| 5. Market | TAM/SAM/SOM, why now | Show opportunity |
| 6. Business Model | How you make money | Revenue clarity |
| 7. Traction | Metrics, growth, milestones | Prove momentum |
| 8. Competition | Landscape, differentiation | Show awareness |
| 9. Go-to-Market | How you acquire customers | Show scalability |
| 10. Team | Founders, key hires | Prove capability |
| 11. Financials | Projections, unit economics | Show understanding |
| 12. Ask | Amount, use of funds, timeline | Clear ask |
Pitch Narrative Arc
SETUP (Slides 1-3)
- Hook with the problem
- Make it personal/urgent
- Introduce solution
BUILD (Slides 4-7)
- Show the product
- Prove the market
- Demonstrate traction
CLOSE (Slides 8-12)
- Address competition
- Show the path forward
- Make the ask
Traction Metrics by Stage
| Stage | Metrics to Highlight |
|---|---|
| Pre-Seed | Waitlist, letters of intent, early pilots |
| Seed | Revenue, customers, growth rate, retention |
| Series A | ARR, MRR growth, NRR, LTV:CAC, payback |
| Series B+ | Rule of 40, magic number, NRR, cohorts |
References
| Reference | Purpose |
|---|---|
| cap-table-management.md | Cap table best practices, investor red flags, modeling |
| post-investment-operations.md | Post-funding checklist, governance, investor relations |
| term-sheets-and-diligence.md | Term sheet terms, data room, due diligence, investor updates |
| pitch-narrative-design.md | Pitch storytelling, headline-driven slides, demo integration, Q&A handling |
| investor-targeting-and-crm.md | Investor pipeline, warm intros, CRM setup, conversion benchmarks |
| valuation-negotiation.md | Valuation methods, negotiation tactics, terms tradeoffs, anti-dilution |
| safe-mechanics-guide.md | SAFE conversion math, stacking, vs convertible notes, common mistakes |
| investor-update-template.md | Post-raise investor communication cadence, update templates, reporting |
Templates
| Template | Purpose |
|---|---|
| fundraising-plan.md | Full fundraising strategy |
| fundraising-deck-outline.md | Deck outline and slide takeaways |
| data-room-checklist.md | Diligence-ready data room checklist |
Data
| File | Purpose |
|---|---|
| sources.json | Fundraising resources (25 sources) |
Do / Avoid (Jan 2026)
Do
- Track burn multiple: Net Burn / Net New ARR is a common investor screening metric.
- Use post-money SAFEs when appropriate: Common at pre-seed and simplify cap table modeling.
- Get 409A before options: Required for compliance, red flag if outdated.
- Build data room early: Start 3-4 months before fundraising, use version control.
- Headline every slide: Say the takeaway ("We reduce fraud 90%"), not labels ("Product Overview").
Avoid
- Vanity metrics without unit economics: GMV/signups mean nothing if you're burning $3 to make $1.
- Outdated 409A valuation: Creates tax liability and diligence red flags.
- Missing IP assignments: Every contractor, intern, employee must have signed.
- Inflated TAM without bottom-up assumptions.
- Inconsistent metrics across deck, model, and data room.
What Good Looks Like
- Narrative: one consistent story across deck, memo, and demo.
- Metrics: every KPI has a definition (formula + timeframe + source) and matches across artifacts.
- Data room: diligence-ready folder with cohorts, pipeline, contracts/terms, and key policies.
- Milestones: the raise maps to a milestone plan and runway model (best/base/worst case).
- Process: a tracked pipeline with weekly cadence (outreach, meetings, follow-ups, learnings).
Weekly Installs
36
Repository
vasilyu1983/ai-…s-publicGitHub Stars
41
First Seen
Jan 23, 2026
Security Audits
Installed on
gemini-cli27
codex27
cursor26
opencode26
github-copilot25
amp23