on-page-seo-auditor
Comprehensive on-page SEO audits identifying title tags, meta descriptions, headers, content quality, keywords, internal links, and image optimization.
- Analyzes 8+ on-page elements with scoring rubrics: title tags, meta descriptions, header hierarchy, content depth, keyword placement, internal linking structure, image alt text, and technical factors like canonicals and mobile optimization
- Supports single-page audits, competitor comparisons, and pre-publish content reviews with actionable recommendations tied to specific page locations
- Integrates with SEO tools and web crawlers for automated data retrieval; works with manual input when tools unavailable
- Includes 17-item CORE-EEAT quick scan, priority issue classification (critical/important/minor), and expected ranking impact for each recommendation
On-Page SEO Auditor
SEO & GEO Skills Library · 20 skills for SEO + GEO · ClawHub · skills.sh System Mode: This optimization skill follows the shared Skill Contract and State Model.
This skill performs detailed on-page SEO audits to identify issues and optimization opportunities. It analyzes all on-page elements that affect search rankings and provides actionable recommendations.
System role: Optimization layer skill. It turns weak pages, structures, and technical issues into prioritized repair work.
When This Must Trigger
Use this when the conversation involves any of these situations — even if the user does not use SEO terminology:
Use this whenever the task needs a diagnosis or repair plan that should feed directly into remediation work, not just a one-time opinion.
- Auditing pages before or after publishing
- Identifying why a page isn't ranking well
- Optimizing existing content for better performance
- Creating pre-publish SEO checklists
- Comparing your on-page SEO to competitors
- Systematic site-wide SEO improvements
- Training team members on SEO best practices
What This Skill Does
- Title Tag Analysis: Evaluates title optimization and CTR potential
- Meta Description Review: Checks description quality and length
- Header Structure Audit: Analyzes H1-H6 hierarchy
- Content Quality Assessment: Reviews content depth and optimization
- Keyword Usage Analysis: Checks keyword placement and density
- Internal Link Review: Evaluates internal linking structure
- Image Optimization Check: Audits alt text and file optimization
- Technical On-Page Review: Checks URL, canonical, and mobile factors
Quick Start
Start with one of these prompts. Finish with a short handoff summary using the repository format in Skill Contract.
Audit a Single Page
Audit the on-page SEO of [URL]
Check SEO issues on this page targeting [keyword]: [URL/content]
Compare Against Competitors
Compare on-page SEO of [your URL] vs [competitor URL] for [keyword]
Audit Content Before Publishing
Pre-publish SEO audit for this content targeting [keyword]: [content]
Skill Contract
Expected output: a scored diagnosis, prioritized repair plan, and a short handoff summary ready for memory/audits/.
- Reads: the current page or site state, symptoms, prior audits, and current priorities from CLAUDE.md and the shared State Model when available.
- Writes: a user-facing audit or optimization plan plus a reusable summary that can be stored under
memory/audits/. - Promotes: blocking defects, repeated weaknesses, and fix priorities to
memory/open-loops.mdandmemory/decisions.md. - Next handoff: use the
Next Best Skillbelow when the repair path is clear.
Data Sources
See CONNECTORS.md for tool category placeholders.
With ~~SEO tool + ~~web crawler connected: Claude can automatically pull page HTML via ~~web crawler, fetch keyword search volume and difficulty from ~~SEO tool, retrieve click-through rate data from ~~search console, and download competitor pages for comparison. This enables fully automated audits with live data.
With manual data only: Ask the user to provide:
- Page URL or complete HTML content
- Target primary and secondary keywords
- Competitor page URLs for comparison (optional)
Proceed with the full audit using provided data. Note in the output which findings are from automated crawl vs. manual review.
Instructions
When a user requests an on-page SEO audit:
-
Gather Page Information
### Audit Setup **Page URL**: [URL] **Target Keyword**: [primary keyword] **Secondary Keywords**: [additional keywords] **Page Type**: [blog/product/landing/service] **Business Goal**: [traffic/conversions/authority] -
Audit Title Tag
## Title Tag Analysis **Current Title**: [title] **Character Count**: [X] characters | Criterion | Status | Notes | |-----------|--------|-------| | Length (50-60 chars) | ✅/⚠️/❌ | [notes] | | Keyword included | ✅/⚠️/❌ | Position: [front/middle/end] | | Keyword at front | ✅/⚠️/❌ | [notes] | | Unique across site | ✅/⚠️/❌ | [notes] | | Compelling/clickable | ✅/⚠️/❌ | [notes] | | Matches intent | ✅/⚠️/❌ | [notes] | **Title Score**: [X]/10 **Issues Found**: - [Issue 1] - [Issue 2] **Recommended Title**: "[Optimized title suggestion]" **Why**: [Explanation of improvements] -
Audit Meta Description
## Meta Description Analysis **Current Description**: [description] **Character Count**: [X] characters | Criterion | Status | Notes | |-----------|--------|-------| | Length (150-160 chars) | ✅/⚠️/❌ | [notes] | | Keyword included | ✅/⚠️/❌ | [notes] | | Call-to-action present | ✅/⚠️/❌ | [notes] | | Unique across site | ✅/⚠️/❌ | [notes] | | Accurately describes page | ✅/⚠️/❌ | [notes] | | Compelling copy | ✅/⚠️/❌ | [notes] | **Description Score**: [X]/10 **Issues Found**: - [Issue 1] **Recommended Description**: "[Optimized description suggestion]" ([X] chars) -
Audit Header Structure
## Header Structure Analysis ### Current Header HierarchyH1: [H1 text] H2: [H2 text] H3: [H3 text] H3: [H3 text] H2: [H2 text] H3: [H3 text] H2: [H2 text]
| Criterion | Status | Notes | |-----------|--------|-------| | Single H1 | ✅/⚠️/❌ | Found: [X] H1s | | H1 includes keyword | ✅/⚠️/❌ | [notes] | | Logical hierarchy | ✅/⚠️/❌ | [notes] | | H2s include keywords | ✅/⚠️/❌ | [X]/[Y] contain keywords | | No skipped levels | ✅/⚠️/❌ | [notes] | | Descriptive headers | ✅/⚠️/❌ | [notes] | **Header Score**: [X]/10 **Issues Found**: - [Issue 1] - [Issue 2] **Recommended Changes**: - H1: [suggestion] - H2s: [suggestions] -
Audit Content Quality — Word count, reading level, comprehensiveness, formatting, E-E-A-T signals, content elements checklist, gap identification
Reference: See references/audit-templates.md for the content quality template (Step 5).
-
Audit Keyword Usage — Primary/secondary keyword placement across all page elements, LSI/related terms, density analysis
Reference: See references/audit-templates.md for the keyword optimization template (Step 6).
-
Audit Internal Links — Link count, anchor text relevance, broken links, recommended additions
Reference: See references/audit-templates.md for the internal linking template (Step 7).
-
Audit Images — Alt text, file names, sizes, formats, lazy loading
Reference: See references/audit-templates.md for the image optimization template (Step 8).
-
Audit Technical On-Page Elements — URL, canonical, mobile, speed, HTTPS, schema
Reference: See references/audit-templates.md for the technical on-page template (Step 9).
-
CORE-EEAT Content Quality Quick Scan — 17 on-page-relevant items from the 80-item CORE-EEAT benchmark
Reference: See references/audit-templates.md for the CORE-EEAT quick scan template (Step 10). Full benchmark: CORE-EEAT Benchmark.
-
Generate Audit Summary — Overall score with visual breakdown, priority issues (critical/important/minor), quick wins, detailed recommendations, competitor comparison, action checklist, expected results
Reference: See references/audit-templates.md for the full audit summary template (Step 11).
Validation Checkpoints
Input Validation
- Target keyword(s) clearly specified by user
- Page content accessible (either via URL or provided HTML)
- If competitor comparison requested, competitor URL provided
Output Validation
- Every recommendation cites specific data points (not generic advice)
- Scores based on measurable criteria, not subjective opinion
- All suggested changes include specific locations (title tag, H2 #3, paragraph 5, etc.)
- Source of each data point clearly stated (~~SEO tool data, user-provided, ~~web crawler, or manual review)
Example
Reference: See references/audit-example.md for a full worked example (noise-cancelling headphones audit) and page-type checklists (blog post, product page, landing page).
Tips for Success
- Prioritize issues by impact - Fix critical issues first
- Compare to competitors - See what's working for top rankings
- Balance optimization and readability - Don't over-optimize
- Audit regularly - Content degrades over time
- Test changes - Track ranking changes after updates
Scoring details: For the complete weight distribution, scoring scale, issue resolution playbook, and industry benchmarks, see references/scoring-rubric.md.
Save Results
After delivering audit or optimization findings to the user, ask:
"Save these results for future sessions?"
If yes, write a dated summary to memory/audits/on-page-seo-auditor/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>.md containing:
- One-line verdict or headline finding
- Top 3-5 actionable items
- Open loops or blockers
- Source data references
If any veto-level issue was found (CORE-EEAT T04, C01, R10 or CITE T03, T05, T09), also append a one-liner to memory/hot-cache.md without asking.
Reference Materials
- Scoring Rubric — Detailed scoring criteria, weight distribution, and grade boundaries for on-page audits
- Audit Templates — Detailed output templates for steps 5-11 (content quality, keywords, links, images, technical, CORE-EEAT scan, audit summary)
- Audit Example & Checklists — Full worked example and page-type checklists (blog, product, landing page)
Next Best Skill
- Primary: content-refresher — turn page-level findings into concrete edits.