tooluniverse-gene-enrichment
Gene Enrichment and Pathway Analysis
Perform comprehensive gene enrichment analysis including Gene Ontology (GO), KEGG, Reactome, WikiPathways, and MSigDB enrichment using both Over-Representation Analysis (ORA) and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA). Integrates local computation via gseapy with ToolUniverse pathway databases for cross-validated, publication-ready results.
IMPORTANT: Always use English terms in tool calls (gene names, pathway names, organism names), even if the user writes in another language. Only try original-language terms as a fallback if English returns no results. Respond in the user's language.
When to Use This Skill
Apply when users:
- Ask about gene enrichment analysis (GO, KEGG, Reactome, etc.)
- Have a gene list from differential expression, clustering, or any experiment
- Want to know which biological processes, molecular functions, or cellular components are enriched
- Need KEGG or Reactome pathway enrichment analysis
- Ask about GSEA (Gene Set Enrichment Analysis) with ranked gene lists
- Want over-representation analysis (ORA) with Fisher's exact test
- Need multiple testing correction (Benjamini-Hochberg, Bonferroni)
- Ask about enrichGO, gseapy, clusterProfiler-style analyses
NOT for (use other skills instead):
- Network pharmacology / drug repurposing → Use
tooluniverse-network-pharmacology - Disease characterization → Use
tooluniverse-multiomic-disease-characterization - Single gene function lookup → Use
tooluniverse-disease-research - Spatial omics analysis → Use
tooluniverse-spatial-omics-analysis - Protein-protein interaction analysis only → Use
tooluniverse-protein-interactions
Input Parameters
| Parameter | Required | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| gene_list | Yes | List of gene symbols, Ensembl IDs, or Entrez IDs | ["TP53", "BRCA1", "EGFR"] |
| organism | No | Organism (default: human). Supported: human, mouse, rat, fly, worm, yeast, zebrafish | human |
| analysis_type | No | ORA (default) or GSEA |
ORA |
| enrichment_databases | No | Which databases to query. Default: all applicable | ["GO_BP", "GO_MF", "GO_CC", "KEGG", "Reactome"] |
| gene_id_type | No | Input ID type: symbol, ensembl, entrez, uniprot (auto-detected if omitted) |
symbol |
| p_value_cutoff | No | Significance threshold (default: 0.05) | 0.05 |
| correction_method | No | Multiple testing: BH (Benjamini-Hochberg, default), bonferroni, fdr |
BH |
| background_genes | No | Custom background gene set (default: genome-wide) | ["GENE1", "GENE2", ...] |
| ranked_gene_list | No | For GSEA: gene-to-score mapping (e.g., log2FC) | {"TP53": 2.5, "BRCA1": -1.3, ...} |
Core Principles
- Report-first approach - Create report file FIRST, then populate progressively
- ID disambiguation FIRST - Detect and convert gene IDs before ANY enrichment
- Multi-source validation - Run enrichment on at least 2 independent tools, cross-validate
- Exact p-values - Report raw p-values AND adjusted p-values with correction method
- Multiple testing correction - ALWAYS apply Benjamini-Hochberg unless user specifies otherwise
- Gene set size filtering - Filter by min/max gene set size to avoid trivial/overly broad terms
- Evidence grading - Grade enrichment sources T1-T4
- Negative results documented - "No significant enrichment" is a valid finding
- Source references - Every enrichment result must cite the tool/database/library used
- Completeness checklist - Mandatory section at end showing analysis coverage
Decision Tree: ORA vs GSEA
Q: Do you have a ranked gene list (with scores/fold-changes)?
YES → Use GSEA (gseapy.prerank)
- Input: Gene-to-score mapping (e.g., log2FC)
- Statistics: Running enrichment score, permutation test
- Cutoff: FDR q-val < 0.25 (standard for GSEA)
- Output: NES (Normalized Enrichment Score), lead genes
See: references/gsea_workflow.md
NO → Use ORA (gseapy.enrichr)
- Input: Gene list only
- Statistics: Fisher's exact test, hypergeometric
- Cutoff: Adjusted P-value < 0.05 (or user specified)
- Output: P-value, adjusted P-value, overlap, odds ratio
See: references/ora_workflow.md
Decision Tree: gseapy vs ToolUniverse Tools
Q: Which enrichment method should I use?
Primary Analysis (ALWAYS):
├─ gseapy.enrichr (ORA) OR gseapy.prerank (GSEA)
│ - Most comprehensive (225+ Enrichr libraries)
│ - GO (BP, MF, CC), KEGG, Reactome, WikiPathways, MSigDB
│ - All organisms supported
│ - Returns: P-value, Adjusted P-value, Overlap, Genes
│ See: references/enrichr_guide.md
Cross-Validation (REQUIRED for publication):
├─ PANTHER_enrichment [T1 - curated]
│ - Curated GO enrichment
│ - Multiple organisms (taxonomy ID)
│ - GO BP, MF, CC, PANTHER pathways, Reactome
│
├─ STRING_functional_enrichment [T2 - validated]
│ - Returns ALL categories in one call
│ - Filter by category: Process, Function, Component, KEGG, Reactome
│ - Network-based enrichment
│
└─ ReactomeAnalysis_pathway_enrichment [T1 - curated]
- Reactome curated pathways
- Cross-species projection
- Detailed pathway hierarchy
Additional Context (Optional):
├─ GO_get_term_by_id, QuickGO_get_term_detail (GO term details)
├─ Reactome_get_pathway, Reactome_get_pathway_hierarchy (pathway context)
├─ WikiPathways_search, WikiPathways_get_pathway (community pathways)
└─ STRING_ppi_enrichment (network topology analysis)
Quick Start Workflow
Step 1: Create Report File (IMMEDIATE)
report_path = f"{analysis_name}_enrichment_report.md"
# Write header with placeholder sections
# Update progressively as analysis proceeds
Step 2: ID Conversion and Validation
from tooluniverse import ToolUniverse
tu = ToolUniverse()
tu.load_tools()
# Detect ID type
gene_list = ["TP53", "BRCA1", "EGFR"]
# Auto-detect: ENSG* = Ensembl, numeric = Entrez, pattern = UniProt, else = Symbol
# Convert if needed (Ensembl/Entrez → Symbol)
result = tu.tools.MyGene_batch_query(
gene_ids=gene_list,
fields="symbol,entrezgene,ensembl.gene"
)
# Extract symbols from results
# Validate with STRING
mapped = tu.tools.STRING_map_identifiers(
protein_ids=gene_symbols,
species=9606 # human
)
# Use preferredName for canonical symbols
See: references/id_conversion.md for complete examples
Step 3: Primary Enrichment with gseapy
For ORA (gene list only):
import gseapy
# GO Biological Process
go_bp = gseapy.enrichr(
gene_list=gene_symbols,
gene_sets='GO_Biological_Process_2021',
organism='human',
outdir=None,
no_plot=True,
background=background_genes # None = genome-wide
)
go_bp_sig = go_bp.results[go_bp.results['Adjusted P-value'] < 0.05]
For GSEA (ranked gene list):
import pandas as pd
# Ranked by log2FC
ranked_series = pd.Series(gene_to_score).sort_values(ascending=False)
gsea_result = gseapy.prerank(
rnk=ranked_series,
gene_sets='GO_Biological_Process_2021',
outdir=None,
no_plot=True,
seed=42,
min_size=5,
max_size=500,
permutation_num=1000
)
gsea_sig = gsea_result.res2d[gsea_result.res2d['FDR q-val'] < 0.25]
See:
- references/ora_workflow.md for complete ORA examples
- references/gsea_workflow.md for complete GSEA examples
- references/enrichr_guide.md for all 225+ libraries
Step 4: Cross-Validation with ToolUniverse
# PANTHER [T1 - curated]
panther_bp = tu.tools.PANTHER_enrichment(
gene_list=','.join(gene_symbols), # comma-separated string
organism=9606,
annotation_dataset='GO:0008150' # biological_process
)
# STRING [T2 - validated]
string_result = tu.tools.STRING_functional_enrichment(
protein_ids=gene_symbols,
species=9606
)
# Filter by category: Process, Function, Component, KEGG, Reactome
# Reactome [T1 - curated]
reactome_result = tu.tools.ReactomeAnalysis_pathway_enrichment(
identifiers=' '.join(gene_symbols), # space-separated
page_size=50,
include_disease=True
)
See: references/cross_validation.md for comparison strategies
Step 5: Report Compilation
## Results
### GO Biological Process (Top 10)
| Term | P-value | Adj. P-value | Overlap | Genes | Evidence |
|------|---------|-------------|---------|-------|----------|
| regulation of cell cycle (GO:0051726) | 1.2e-08 | 3.4e-06 | 12/45 | TP53;BRCA1;... | [T2] gseapy |
### Cross-Validation
| GO Term | gseapy FDR | PANTHER FDR | STRING FDR | Consensus |
|---------|-----------|-------------|-----------|-----------|
| GO:0051726 | 3.4e-06 | 2.1e-05 | 1.8e-05 | 3/3 ✓ |
### Completeness Checklist
- [x] ID Conversion (MyGene, STRING) - 95% mapped
- [x] GO BP (gseapy, PANTHER, STRING) - 24 significant terms
- [x] GO MF (gseapy, PANTHER, STRING) - 18 significant terms
- [x] GO CC (gseapy, PANTHER, STRING) - 12 significant terms
- [x] KEGG (gseapy, STRING) - 8 significant pathways
- [x] Reactome (gseapy, ReactomeAPI) - 15 significant pathways
- [x] Cross-validation - 12 consensus terms (2+ sources)
See: scripts/format_enrichment_output.py for automated formatting
Evidence Grading
| Tier | Symbol | Criteria | Examples |
|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | [T1] | Curated/experimental enrichment | PANTHER, Reactome Analysis Service |
| T2 | [T2] | Computational enrichment, well-validated | gseapy ORA/GSEA, STRING functional enrichment |
| T3 | [T3] | Text-mining/predicted enrichment | Enrichr non-curated libraries |
| T4 | [T4] | Single-source annotation | Individual gene GO annotations from QuickGO |
Supported Organisms
| Organism | Taxonomy ID | gseapy | PANTHER | STRING | Reactome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Human | 9606 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Mouse | 10090 | Yes (*_Mouse) |
Yes | Yes | Yes (projection) |
| Rat | 10116 | Limited | Yes | Yes | Yes (projection) |
| Fly | 7227 | Limited | Yes | Yes | Yes (projection) |
| Worm | 6239 | Limited | Yes | Yes | Yes (projection) |
| Yeast | 4932 | Limited | Yes | Yes | Yes |
See: references/organism_support.md for organism-specific libraries
Common Patterns
Pattern 1: Standard DEG Enrichment (ORA)
Input: List of differentially expressed gene symbols
Flow: ID validation → gseapy ORA (GO + KEGG + Reactome) →
PANTHER + STRING cross-validation → Report top enriched terms
Use: When you have unranked gene list from DESeq2/edgeR
Pattern 2: Ranked Gene List (GSEA)
Input: Gene-to-log2FC mapping from differential expression
Flow: Convert to ranked Series → gseapy GSEA (GO + KEGG + MSigDB) →
Filter by FDR < 0.25 → Report NES and lead genes
Use: When you have fold-changes or other ranking metric
Pattern 3: BixBench Enrichment Question
Input: Specific question about enrichment (e.g., "What is the adjusted p-val for neutrophil activation?")
Flow: Parse question for gene list and library → Run gseapy with exact library →
Find specific term → Report exact p-value and adjusted p-value
Use: When answering targeted questions about specific terms
Pattern 4: Multi-Organism Enrichment
Input: Gene list from mouse experiment
Flow: Use organism='mouse' for gseapy → organism=10090 for PANTHER/STRING →
projection=True for Reactome human pathway mapping
Use: When working with non-human organisms
See: references/common_patterns.md for more examples
Troubleshooting
"No significant enrichment found":
- Verify gene symbols are valid (STRING_map_identifiers)
- Try different library versions (2021 vs 2023 vs 2025)
- Try relaxing significance cutoff or use GSEA instead
"Gene not found" errors:
- Check ID type and convert using MyGene_batch_query
- Remove version suffixes from Ensembl IDs (ENSG00000141510.16 → ENSG00000141510)
"STRING returns all categories":
- This is expected; filter by
d['category'] == 'Process'after receiving results
See: references/troubleshooting.md for complete guide
Tool Reference
Primary Enrichment Tools
| Tool | Input | Output | Use For |
|---|---|---|---|
gseapy.enrichr() |
gene_list, gene_sets, organism | .results DataFrame |
ORA with 225+ libraries |
gseapy.prerank() |
rnk (ranked Series), gene_sets | .res2d DataFrame |
GSEA analysis |
Cross-Validation Tools
| Tool | Key Parameters | Evidence Grade |
|---|---|---|
PANTHER_enrichment |
gene_list (comma-sep), organism, annotation_dataset | [T1] |
STRING_functional_enrichment |
protein_ids, species | [T2] |
ReactomeAnalysis_pathway_enrichment |
identifiers (space-sep), page_size | [T1] |
ID Conversion Tools
| Tool | Input | Output |
|---|---|---|
MyGene_batch_query |
gene_ids, fields | Symbol, Entrez, Ensembl mappings |
STRING_map_identifiers |
protein_ids, species | Preferred names, STRING IDs |
See: references/tool_parameters.md for complete parameter documentation
Detailed Documentation
All detailed examples, code blocks, and advanced topics have been moved to references/:
- references/ora_workflow.md - Complete ORA examples with all databases
- references/gsea_workflow.md - Complete GSEA workflow with ranked lists
- references/enrichr_guide.md - All 225+ Enrichr libraries and usage
- references/cross_validation.md - Multi-source validation strategies
- references/id_conversion.md - Gene ID disambiguation and conversion
- references/tool_parameters.md - Complete tool parameter reference
- references/organism_support.md - Organism-specific configurations
- references/common_patterns.md - Detailed use case examples
- references/troubleshooting.md - Complete troubleshooting guide
- references/multiple_testing.md - Correction methods (BH, Bonferroni, BY)
- references/report_template.md - Standard report format
Helper scripts:
- scripts/format_enrichment_output.py - Format results for reports
- scripts/compare_enrichment_sources.py - Cross-validation analysis
- scripts/filter_by_gene_set_size.py - Filter terms by size
Resources
For network-level analysis: tooluniverse-network-pharmacology For disease characterization: tooluniverse-multiomic-disease-characterization For spatial omics: tooluniverse-spatial-omics-analysis For protein interactions: tooluniverse-protein-interactions
gseapy documentation: https://gseapy.readthedocs.io/ PANTHER API: http://pantherdb.org/services/oai/pantherdb/ STRING API: https://string-db.org/cgi/help?sessionId=&subpage=api Reactome Analysis: https://reactome.org/AnalysisService/