Grant Proposal Writer

Secure funding through compelling proposals.

Grant Landscape

Funder Types

Type	Examples	Characteristics
Federal	NSF, NIH, NEA, NEH	Large awards, rigorous process, public benefit
Foundation	Ford, Mellon, MacArthur	Mission-aligned, relationship-based
Corporate	Google, Adobe, Microsoft	Product/brand alignment, shorter timelines
Institutional	Internal grants, seed funds	Lower amounts, faster decisions
Crowdfunding	Kickstarter, Experiment	Public-facing, momentum-based

Fit Assessment

Before writing, assess alignment:

Factor	Question	Weight
Mission	Does your work serve their goals?	Critical
Scope	Is your budget in their range?	Critical
Eligibility	Do you meet requirements?	Critical
Track Record	Have they funded similar work?	Important
Timing	Does your timeline match?	Important
Competition	What's the funding rate?	Consider

---

Proposal Structure (Standard)

1. Project Summary/Abstract

One page maximum. Must stand alone.

Structure:
- Problem/opportunity (2-3 sentences)
- Proposed approach (2-3 sentences)
- Expected outcomes (2-3 sentences)
- Broader impact (1-2 sentences)

2. Statement of Need

Establish the problem:

What is the problem?
↓
Who is affected?
↓
What are current approaches?
↓
What gap remains?
↓
Why now?

Effective patterns:

• Statistics that humanize scale
• Specific examples that illustrate
• Expert voices that validate
• Logical argument that compels

3. Goals and Objectives

Element	Definition	Example
Goal	Broad intended impact	"Improve digital literacy among seniors"
Objective	Specific, measurable outcome	"Train 200 seniors in basic computer skills by Dec 2025"
Activity	What you'll do	"Conduct 20 workshops at community centers"

SMART Objectives:

• Specific: Clear and defined
• Measurable: Quantifiable
• Achievable: Realistic
• Relevant: Aligned with goal
• Time-bound: Has deadline

4. Methods/Approach

Describe HOW you'll achieve objectives:

For each objective:
1. Activities planned
2. Timeline/sequence
3. Personnel responsible
4. Resources required
5. Rationale for approach

Methodology credibility:

• Cite precedent or literature
• Explain why this approach
• Address potential challenges
• Show awareness of alternatives

5. Evaluation Plan

Type	Question	Methods
Process	Did we do what we said?	Activity logs, attendance
Outcome	Did it work?	Pre/post tests, surveys
Impact	What changed?	Long-term follow-up, indicators

Evaluation components:

• What will be measured
• How data will be collected
• When measurement occurs
• Who will analyze
• How results will be used

6. Timeline

Year 1
Q1: [Activities]
Q2: [Activities]
Q3: [Activities]
Q4: [Activities]

Year 2
Q1: [Activities]
...

Milestones:
- Month 6: [Milestone]
- Month 12: [Milestone]
- Month 18: [Milestone]

7. Budget and Justification

See Budget section below.

8. Personnel/Qualifications

For each key person:

[Name], [Title]
Role: [Specific responsibilities]
Qualifications: [Why they're suited]
Time commitment: [% FTE or hours]

9. Organizational Capacity

Demonstrate ability to execute:

• Relevant past projects
• Infrastructure/facilities
• Partnerships
• Financial stability

10. Sustainability/Future Plans

How will this work continue after funding?
- Revenue streams
- Institutionalization
- Partnerships
- Scaled approach

---

Budget Development

Budget Categories

Category	Includes
Personnel	Salaries, benefits, consultants
Equipment	>$5K items typically
Supplies	Consumables, materials
Travel	Conferences, fieldwork
Contractual	Subcontracts, services
Other Direct	Participant support, publications
Indirect	Overhead (varies by institution)

Budget Template

PERSONNEL
PI Name, 2 months summer salary         $XX,XXX
Graduate Student, 12 months             $XX,XXX
Fringe Benefits (XX%)                   $X,XXX
                            Subtotal:   $XX,XXX

EQUIPMENT
[Item description]                      $X,XXX
                            Subtotal:   $X,XXX

SUPPLIES
Research supplies                       $X,XXX
Computing                               $X,XXX
                            Subtotal:   $X,XXX

TRAVEL
Domestic (X trips)                      $X,XXX
International (X trips)                 $X,XXX
                            Subtotal:   $X,XXX

OTHER DIRECT COSTS
Participant stipends                    $X,XXX
Publication costs                       $X,XXX
                            Subtotal:   $X,XXX

TOTAL DIRECT COSTS                      $XXX,XXX
INDIRECT COSTS (XX%)                    $XX,XXX
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS                     $XXX,XXX

Budget Justification

For each line item:

[Item]: $X,XXX
[Why needed]: This [item] is necessary for [specific project activity]
because [rationale]. The amount is based on [calculation/quote/rate].

---

Writing Strategies

For Reviewers

Remember:

• Reviewers are busy
• They may not be experts in YOUR area
• They're looking for reasons to fund AND reject
• Clear writing signals clear thinking

Structure Signals

Use headers, white space, bold:

**Problem**: Clear statement of the issue.

**Approach**: How we'll address it.

**Outcome**: What will result.

Strong vs Weak Writing

Weak	Strong
"We hope to..."	"We will..."
"This may lead to..."	"This will produce..."
"It is believed that..."	"Research shows that..."
"Various methods..."	"Three specific methods: A, B, C..."
"Significant impact..."	"40% reduction in..."

The "So What" Test

Every claim should answer:

• Why does this matter?
• To whom does this matter?
• What changes if this succeeds?

---

Review Criteria (Typical)

NSF Merit Review

1. Intellectual Merit

   • Importance of proposed activity
   • Qualified team
   • Sound methodology
   • Adequate resources

2. Broader Impacts

   • Benefit to society
   • STEM workforce development
   • Broadening participation
   • Public engagement

NEH Criteria

1. Significance: Importance of the project
2. Quality: Soundness of design
3. Impact: Potential effects
4. Feasibility: Likelihood of completion

Foundation Criteria (Varies)

Common themes:

• Mission alignment
• Potential for impact
• Organizational capacity
• Sustainability
• Innovation

---

Specific Grant Types

Research Grants

Key elements:

• Literature review showing gap
• Research questions/hypotheses
• Rigorous methodology
• Preliminary data if available
• Dissemination plan

Creative/Arts Grants

Key elements:

• Artistic statement/vision
• Work samples (critical)
• Project description
• Community impact
• Artist's biography

Fellowship Applications

Key elements:

• Personal statement
• Research/project proposal
• Letters of recommendation
• CV/resume
• Writing sample (often)

---

Common Mistakes

Mistake	Fix
Not following guidelines	Read guidelines 3+ times
Vague objectives	Make SMART
Misaligned with funder	Research thoroughly
Budget doesn't match narrative	Cross-check both
Missing required elements	Use checklist
Jargon overload	Define terms, simplify
No preliminary work	Show feasibility
Weak evaluation	Be specific and realistic
Last-minute submission	Build in buffer

---

Timeline for Writing

8-Week Timeline

Week	Activities
1	Read guidelines, assess fit, outline
2	Draft statement of need, goals
3	Draft methods, timeline
4	Draft evaluation, sustainability
5	Develop budget and justification
6	Complete first full draft
7	Internal review, revision
8	Final polish, submit early

---

References

• references/budget-templates.md - Detailed budget formats
• references/funder-profiles.md - Major funder information
• references/boilerplate-library.md - Reusable sections