nostr-social-graph
Nostr Social Graph
Overview
Build and traverse Nostr social graphs: follow lists, relay discovery, the outbox model, and NIP-51 lists. This skill handles the non-obvious parts — correct tag structures for each list kind, the outbox model's read/write relay routing, private list item encryption, and efficient graph traversal patterns.
When to Use
- The task involves Nostr follow graphs, relay lists, mute/bookmark sets, NIP-51 lists, or outbox-model relay discovery.
- The user is implementing list semantics, social traversal, or feed sourcing from relationship data.
- The problem is graph/list behavior across users and relays, not individual-note publishing.
- The request needs event structures or algorithms for follows, lists, or social discovery.
Do NOT use when:
- The task is building a single note, reply, or other standalone event.
- The work is relay protocol or generic client lifecycle logic.
- The problem is query-filter syntax rather than social-graph semantics.
Response format
Always structure the final response with these top-level sections, in this order:
- Summary — state the task, scope, and main conclusion in 1-3 sentences.
- Decision / Approach — state the key classification, assumptions, or chosen path.
- Artifacts — provide the primary deliverable(s) for this skill. Use clear subheadings for multiple files, commands, JSON payloads, queries, or documents.
- Validation — state checks performed, important risks, caveats, or unresolved questions.
- Next steps — list concrete follow-up actions, or write
Noneif nothing remains.
Rules:
- Do not omit a section; write
Nonewhen a section does not apply. - If files are produced, list each file path under Artifacts before its contents.
- If commands, JSON, SQL, YAML, or code are produced, put each artifact in fenced code blocks with the correct language tag when possible.
- Keep section names exactly as written above so output stays predictable across skills.
Workflow
1. Identify the List Kind
Ask: "What social graph data is the developer working with?"
| Intent | Kind | Category | NIP |
|---|---|---|---|
| Follow/unfollow users | 3 | Replaceable | NIP-02 |
| Mute users, words, hashtags | 10000 | Replaceable | NIP-51 |
| Pin notes to profile | 10001 | Replaceable | NIP-51 |
| Advertise read/write relays | 10002 | Replaceable | NIP-65 |
| Bookmark events | 10003 | Replaceable | NIP-51 |
| Set DM relay preferences | 10050 | Replaceable | NIP-51 |
| Categorized follow groups | 30000 | Addressable | NIP-51 |
| User-defined relay groups | 30002 | Addressable | NIP-51 |
See references/list-kinds.md for all list kinds with full tag structures.
2. Build the Event Structure
Follow List (Kind:3)
{
"kind": 3,
"tags": [
["p", "<pubkey-hex>", "<relay-url>", "<petname>"],
["p", "<pubkey-hex>", "<relay-url>"],
["p", "<pubkey-hex>"]
],
"content": ""
}
Rules:
- Replaceable: only the latest kind:3 per pubkey is kept
- Each
ptag = one followed pubkey - Relay URL and petname are optional (can be empty string or omitted)
contentis empty (historically held relay prefs, now use kind:10002)- Append new follows to the end for chronological ordering
- Publish the complete list every time — new event replaces the old one
Relay List Metadata (Kind:10002)
{
"kind": 10002,
"tags": [
["r", "wss://relay.example.com"],
["r", "wss://write-only.example.com", "write"],
["r", "wss://read-only.example.com", "read"]
],
"content": ""
}
Rules:
- Replaceable: only the latest kind:10002 per pubkey is kept
rtags with relay URLs- No marker = both read AND write
"read"marker = read only"write"marker = write only- Keep small: guide users to 2-4 relays per category
- Spread this event widely for discoverability
Mute List (Kind:10000)
{
"kind": 10000,
"tags": [
["p", "<pubkey-hex>"],
["t", "hashtag-to-mute"],
["word", "lowercase-word"],
["e", "<thread-event-id>"]
],
"content": "<encrypted-private-items-or-empty>"
}
Rules:
- Public items go in
tags - Private items go in
contentas encrypted JSON - Supports
p(pubkeys),t(hashtags),word(strings),e(threads) - Words should be lowercase for case-insensitive matching
3. Handle Private List Items (NIP-51 Encryption)
Any NIP-51 list can have private items. Public items live in tags, private
items are encrypted in content.
Encryption process:
// Private items use the same tag structure as public items
const privateItems = [
["p", "07caba282f76441955b695551c3c5c742e5b9202a3784780f8086fdcdc1da3a9"],
["word", "nsfw"],
];
// Encrypt with NIP-44 using the author's own key pair
// The shared key is computed from author's pubkey + privkey
const encrypted = nip44.encrypt(
JSON.stringify(privateItems),
conversationKey(authorPrivkey, authorPubkey),
);
event.content = encrypted;
Decryption and backward compatibility:
function decryptPrivateItems(event, authorPrivkey) {
if (!event.content || event.content === "") return [];
// Detect NIP-04 vs NIP-44 by checking for "iv" in ciphertext
if (event.content.includes("?iv=")) {
// Legacy NIP-04 format
return JSON.parse(
nip04.decrypt(authorPrivkey, authorPubkey, event.content),
);
} else {
// Current NIP-44 format
return JSON.parse(nip44.decrypt(
conversationKey(authorPrivkey, authorPubkey),
event.content,
));
}
}
4. Implement the Outbox Model
The outbox model is the correct way to route event fetching across relays. See references/outbox-model.md for the full explanation.
Core rules:
| Action | Which relays to use |
|---|---|
| Fetch events FROM a user | That user's WRITE relays |
| Fetch events ABOUT a user (mentions) | That user's READ relays |
| Publish your own event | Your WRITE relays |
| Notify tagged users | Each tagged user's READ relays |
| Spread your kind:10002 | As many relays as viable |
Implementation pattern:
async function buildFeedSubscriptions(myFollows: string[]) {
// Step 1: Fetch kind:10002 for each followed user
const relayLists = await fetchRelayLists(myFollows);
// Step 2: Group follows by their WRITE relays
const relayToUsers = new Map<string, string[]>();
for (const [pubkey, relays] of relayLists) {
const writeRelays = getWriteRelays(relays); // "write" or no marker
for (const relay of writeRelays) {
if (!relayToUsers.has(relay)) relayToUsers.set(relay, []);
relayToUsers.get(relay)!.push(pubkey);
}
}
// Step 3: Subscribe to each relay for its relevant users
for (const [relay, users] of relayToUsers) {
subscribe(relay, { kinds: [1], authors: users });
}
}
function getWriteRelays(tags: string[][]): string[] {
return tags
.filter((t) => t[0] === "r" && (t.length === 2 || t[2] === "write"))
.map((t) => t[1]);
}
function getReadRelays(tags: string[][]): string[] {
return tags
.filter((t) => t[0] === "r" && (t.length === 2 || t[2] === "read"))
.map((t) => t[1]);
}
5. Traverse the Social Graph
Follows-of-follows (2-hop):
async function getFollowsOfFollows(pubkey: string) {
// 1. Get direct follows
const myFollowList = await fetchKind3(pubkey);
const directFollows = myFollowList.tags
.filter((t) => t[0] === "p")
.map((t) => t[1]);
// 2. Fetch kind:3 for each direct follow
const secondHop = await Promise.all(
directFollows.map((pk) => fetchKind3(pk)),
);
// 3. Aggregate and rank by frequency
const scores = new Map<string, number>();
for (const followList of secondHop) {
for (const tag of followList.tags.filter((t) => t[0] === "p")) {
const pk = tag[1];
if (pk !== pubkey && !directFollows.includes(pk)) {
scores.set(pk, (scores.get(pk) || 0) + 1);
}
}
}
return [...scores.entries()].sort((a, b) => b[1] - a[1]);
}
Web of Trust scoring:
function wotScore(
target: string,
myFollows: string[],
followLists: Map<string, string[]>,
): number {
let score = 0;
for (const follow of myFollows) {
const theirFollows = followLists.get(follow) || [];
if (theirFollows.includes(target)) score++;
}
return score; // Higher = more trusted
}
6. Validate Before Publishing
- Kind is correct for the list type
- All tag types are valid for this kind (see list-kinds reference)
- For kind:3: every entry is a
ptag with valid 32-byte hex pubkey - For kind:10002: every entry is an
rtag with validwss://URL - For kind:10002: markers are only
"read"or"write"(or omitted) - For kind:10000:
wordtags use lowercase strings - Private items are encrypted with NIP-44 (not NIP-04 for new events)
- The complete list is published (not just additions/removals)
-
contentis empty string when no private items exist -
created_atis Unix timestamp in seconds
Common Mistakes
| Mistake | Why It Breaks | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Publishing only new follows instead of the full list | Kind:3 is replaceable — new event replaces old, so partial list = lost follows | Always publish the complete follow list |
| Using kind:3 content for relay preferences | Deprecated; clients ignore it | Use kind:10002 for relay list metadata |
Treating unmarked r tags as write-only |
No marker means BOTH read and write | ["r", "wss://..."] = read + write |
| Fetching from a user's READ relays for their posts | READ relays are where they expect mentions, not where they publish | Use WRITE relays to fetch a user's own events |
| Broadcasting to all known relays | Wastes bandwidth, defeats the outbox model | Use targeted relay routing per the outbox model |
| Using NIP-04 for new private list items | NIP-04 is deprecated for this purpose | Use NIP-44 encryption for new events |
| Forgetting to spread kind:10002 widely | Others can't discover your relays | Publish kind:10002 to well-known indexer relays |
Uppercase words in mute list word tags |
Matching should be case-insensitive | Always store words as lowercase |
| Missing relay URL normalization | Duplicate relay entries with different formatting | Normalize URLs (lowercase host, remove default port, trailing slash) |
Quick Reference
| Operation | Kind | Key Tags | Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| Follow user | 3 | ["p", "<hex>", "<relay>", "<petname>"] |
"" |
| Set relays | 10002 | ["r", "<url>", "<read|write>"] |
"" |
| Mute user/word | 10000 | ["p", "<hex>"], ["word", "<str>"] |
encrypted private items |
| Pin note | 10001 | ["e", "<event-id>"] |
"" |
| Bookmark | 10003 | ["e", "<id>"], ["a", "<coord>"] |
encrypted private items |
| DM relays | 10050 | ["relay", "<url>"] |
"" |
| Follow set | 30000 | ["d", "<id>"], ["p", "<hex>"] |
encrypted private items |
| Relay set | 30002 | ["d", "<id>"], ["relay", "<url>"] |
encrypted private items |
Key Principles
-
Replaceable means complete — Kind:3, 10000, 10001, 10002, 10003 are replaceable events. Every publish must contain the FULL list, not just changes. The new event completely replaces the old one.
-
Outbox model is not optional — Fetching events without consulting kind:10002 relay lists leads to missed content and wasted connections. Always resolve a user's write relays before fetching their events.
-
Private items use NIP-44 — New encrypted list content MUST use NIP-44. When reading, detect NIP-04 legacy format by checking for
?iv=in the ciphertext and handle both. -
Relay lists should be small — Guide users to 2-4 relays per category (read/write). Large relay lists defeat the purpose of targeted routing and increase load on the network.
-
Graph traversal requires relay awareness — You can't just fetch kind:3 from one relay. Use the outbox model to find each user's kind:3 on their write relays, then use those follow lists to discover the next hop.
More from accolver/skill-maker
skill-maker
Create or iteratively improve agent skills with eval-driven refinement when the task is to build a new SKILL.md package or tune an existing skill’s trigger accuracy and performance.
26git-conventional-commits
Generate conventional commit messages from staged git changes when the task is to name or format a commit, not to review code or write release notes.
16pdf-toolkit
Operate the bundled PDF scripts to extract, OCR, create, merge, split, or convert PDFs when the task explicitly involves PDF document processing.
14nostr-event-builder
Construct valid Nostr event JSON and tag structures from requirements when the task is to create or validate concrete events rather than choose which NIPs to use.
12error-handling
Standardize application error handling—taxonomy, propagation, response shapes, logging, and correlation IDs—when the task is to improve consistency of existing error behavior across a codebase.
12pr-description
Generate pull-request descriptions from branch diffs when the task is to explain change scope, motivation, testing, risk, and reviewer guidance for a reviewable branch.
12