token-economics
Token Economics
Tokenomics — the study of token supply dynamics, distribution, and value accrual — is one of the most important factors in crypto asset analysis. Supply changes directly affect price: new tokens entering circulation create selling pressure, while burns and locks reduce it. Understanding these dynamics lets you estimate dilution risk, identify overvalued or undervalued tokens, and anticipate price-moving unlock events.
Why Tokenomics Matters
Price is a function of demand and supply. In crypto, supply is programmable and constantly changing:
- A token inflating at 50%/year needs 50% demand growth just to maintain price
- A large unlock releasing 10% of circulating supply in one day often causes 5-20% drawdowns
- Tokens with >80% of supply locked have extreme dilution risk ahead
- Protocols that burn fees can become net deflationary, creating structural price support
Key Supply Concepts
Total Supply vs Circulating Supply
total_supply = maximum tokens that will ever exist (or current total minted)
circulating_supply = tokens currently available for trading
locked_supply = total_supply - circulating_supply
circulating_pct = circulating_supply / total_supply * 100
Market Cap vs Fully Diluted Valuation
market_cap = price * circulating_supply
fdv = price * total_supply
fdv_mcap_ratio = fdv / market_cap
The FDV/MCap ratio measures future dilution risk:
| FDV/MCap | Dilution Risk | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0-1.5 | Low | Most supply already circulating |
| 1.5-3.0 | Moderate | Significant supply still locked |
| 3.0-5.0 | High | Majority of supply not yet released |
| >5.0 | Very High | Token will face massive dilution |
Net Inflation Rate
annual_new_tokens = emissions + vesting_unlocks + rewards
annual_burned = fee_burns + buyback_burns
net_new_tokens = annual_new_tokens - annual_burned
net_inflation_rate = net_new_tokens / circulating_supply * 100 # percent per year
Supply Dynamics
Inflationary Pressure (tokens entering circulation)
- Emissions: Block rewards, liquidity mining, staking rewards
- Vesting unlocks: Team, investor, and advisor tokens unlocking on schedule
- Unlock events: Large one-time releases (cliff expirations)
- Treasury spending: DAO or foundation distributing tokens
Deflationary Pressure (tokens leaving circulation)
- Fee burns: Protocol burns a portion of transaction fees (like EIP-1559)
- Buyback and burn: Protocol uses revenue to buy and permanently destroy tokens
- Staking locks: Tokens locked in staking (temporarily removed from circulation)
- Lost tokens: Permanently inaccessible tokens (lost keys, burn addresses)
Selling Pressure Estimation
daily_emissions_usd = daily_new_tokens * token_price
percent_sold = 0.50 # assume 50% of new tokens are sold (conservative)
daily_sell_pressure = daily_emissions_usd * percent_sold
sell_pressure_ratio = daily_sell_pressure / daily_volume
# > 0.05 (5%) = significant selling pressure
# > 0.10 (10%) = heavy selling pressure
Vesting and Unlock Schedules
Key Concepts
- Cliff: Period before any tokens unlock (typically 6-12 months)
- Linear vesting: Constant rate of unlock after cliff (monthly or daily)
- Stepped vesting: Periodic unlocks at set intervals (quarterly)
- TGE unlock: Percentage released at Token Generation Event
Analyzing Unlock Impact
unlock_amount_tokens = 10_000_000
avg_daily_volume_tokens = 5_000_000
unlock_volume_ratio = unlock_amount_tokens / avg_daily_volume_tokens
# Impact assessment:
# < 1x daily volume: minor impact
# 1-5x daily volume: moderate impact, expect 2-5% drawdown
# 5-10x daily volume: major impact, expect 5-15% drawdown
# > 10x daily volume: severe impact, expect 10-30% drawdown
Tracking Sources
- CoinGecko / CoinMarketCap: Basic supply data
- Token Terminal: Revenue and valuation metrics
- Token Unlocks (token.unlocks.app): Detailed unlock schedules
- Project documentation: Whitepapers, tokenomics pages
- On-chain: Vesting contract state, treasury balances
Token Distribution Analysis
Typical Allocation Ranges
| Category | Typical Range | Red Flag |
|---|---|---|
| Team/Founders | 15-25% | >30% |
| Investors (Seed+Series) | 10-30% | >40% |
| Community/Ecosystem | 20-40% | <15% |
| Treasury/DAO | 10-20% | <5% |
| Public Sale | 5-20% | <2% |
| Advisors | 2-5% | >10% |
Distribution Red Flags
- >50% insider allocation (team + investors): Insiders control price
- Short vesting (<1 year): Quick dump risk
- No cliff: Immediate selling from day one
- Large single wallets: Concentration risk (use
token-holder-analysisskill) - Unlabeled large allocations: Hidden insider holdings
Distribution Quality Score
def distribution_score(team_pct: float, investor_pct: float,
community_pct: float, cliff_months: int,
vesting_months: int) -> str:
"""Rate token distribution quality."""
score = 0
insider_pct = team_pct + investor_pct
if insider_pct < 30: score += 3
elif insider_pct < 50: score += 1
if community_pct > 30: score += 2
elif community_pct > 20: score += 1
if cliff_months >= 12: score += 2
elif cliff_months >= 6: score += 1
if vesting_months >= 36: score += 2
elif vesting_months >= 24: score += 1
if score >= 8: return "Excellent"
if score >= 6: return "Good"
if score >= 4: return "Moderate"
return "Poor"
Valuation Frameworks
Revenue-Based Metrics
# Price-to-Earnings (for fee-generating protocols)
pe_ratio = fdv / annualized_net_revenue
# Price-to-Sales
ps_ratio = fdv / annualized_total_volume
# Price-to-Fees
pf_ratio = fdv / annualized_protocol_fees
# Revenue Multiple (adjusted for token value accrual)
rev_multiple = fdv / (annualized_fees * fee_share_to_token_holders)
Typical ranges (crypto, highly variable):
- P/E: 10x-100x+ (DeFi protocols)
- P/S: 0.5x-50x
- P/F: 20x-500x
Network Value Metrics
# Network Value to Transactions (NVT)
nvt = market_cap / daily_transaction_volume_usd
# High NVT (>100): potentially overvalued or store-of-value
# Low NVT (<20): potentially undervalued or high activity
# Market Value to Realized Value (MVRV)
# realized_value = sum of each token at its last-moved price
mvrv = market_cap / realized_value
# MVRV > 3.0: historically overvalued zone
# MVRV < 1.0: historically undervalued zone
Comparable Analysis
def comparable_analysis(target: dict, peers: list[dict]) -> dict:
"""Compare target token metrics against peer group.
Each dict has: name, fdv, revenue, tvl, users
Returns premium/discount percentages.
"""
peer_fdv_rev = [p["fdv"] / p["revenue"] for p in peers if p["revenue"] > 0]
peer_fdv_tvl = [p["fdv"] / p["tvl"] for p in peers if p["tvl"] > 0]
avg_fdv_rev = sum(peer_fdv_rev) / len(peer_fdv_rev) if peer_fdv_rev else 0
avg_fdv_tvl = sum(peer_fdv_tvl) / len(peer_fdv_tvl) if peer_fdv_tvl else 0
target_fdv_rev = target["fdv"] / target["revenue"] if target["revenue"] > 0 else 0
target_fdv_tvl = target["fdv"] / target["tvl"] if target["tvl"] > 0 else 0
return {
"fdv_rev_premium": (target_fdv_rev / avg_fdv_rev - 1) * 100 if avg_fdv_rev else None,
"fdv_tvl_premium": (target_fdv_tvl / avg_fdv_tvl - 1) * 100 if avg_fdv_tvl else None,
}
Token Value Accrual Mechanisms
| Mechanism | Description | Valuation Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Fee sharing | Holders receive protocol revenue | Direct cash flow, use DCF |
| Governance | Voting rights on protocol | Hard to value, often overpriced |
| Utility | Required for protocol use | Demand scales with usage |
| Buyback & burn | Protocol buys and burns | Reduces supply, structural bid |
| Staking rewards | Yield from staking | Inflationary if from emissions |
| veToken model | Lock for boosted rewards + governance | Reduces circulating supply |
PumpFun Token Economics
PumpFun tokens on Solana have simplified tokenomics:
- Fixed supply: 1,000,000,000 tokens (1 billion)
- No vesting: All tokens available immediately at launch
- No team allocation: 100% available on bonding curve
- Bonding curve pricing: Price determined by curve math, not supply changes
- Post-graduation: After bonding curve completes, supply is fully liquid on Raydium
- No inflation: No emissions, no staking rewards, no additional minting
Analysis focus for PumpFun tokens shifts from supply dynamics to:
- Holder concentration (use
token-holder-analysis) - Volume sustainability
- Liquidity depth (use
liquidity-analysis) - Dev wallet behavior
Integration with Other Skills
| Skill | Integration |
|---|---|
defillama-api |
Fetch TVL, revenue, fees for valuation metrics |
token-holder-analysis |
Analyze holder concentration and whale behavior |
coingecko-api |
Fetch supply data, market cap, FDV |
liquidity-analysis |
Assess trading liquidity relative to supply |
risk-management |
Supply dilution as risk factor |
position-sizing |
Adjust size for dilution risk |
Files
References
references/supply_analysis.md— Circulating supply tracking, inflation modeling, unlock analysis, burn mechanicsreferences/valuation_frameworks.md— Revenue-based valuation, NVT, MVRV, comparable analysis, value accrual
Scripts
scripts/tokenomics_analyzer.py— Fetch and analyze token supply metrics from CoinGecko, calculate dilution risk and basic valuationsscripts/supply_modeler.py— Project token supply over 12 months given emission and burn parameters, scenario analysis
More from agiprolabs/claude-trading-skills
pandas-ta
Technical analysis with 130+ indicators using pandas-ta for crypto market data
92trading-visualization
Professional trading charts including candlesticks, equity curves, drawdowns, correlation heatmaps, and return distributions
68risk-management
Portfolio-level risk controls, drawdown management, exposure limits, and circuit breakers for crypto trading
65feature-engineering
Feature construction from market data for ML trading models including price, volume, on-chain, and microstructure features
65signal-classification
ML trading signal classifiers using XGBoost and LightGBM with walk-forward validation, SHAP feature importance, and threshold optimization
64market-microstructure
DEX orderflow analysis, trade classification, buyer/seller pressure, and microstructure signals for Solana tokens
62