brainstorming
Brainstorming Ideas Into Designs
Overview
Turn ideas into fully formed designs through natural collaborative dialogue. Understand the project context, ask questions one at a time, propose approaches, and produce an approved design doc.
Brainstorming ends when the design doc is approved and committed. What happens next is the caller's decision — this skill does not dictate the next step.
Anti-Pattern: "This Is Too Simple To Need A Design"
Every project goes through this process. A todo list, a single-function utility, a config change — all of them. "Simple" projects are where unexamined assumptions cause the most wasted work. The design can be short (a few sentences for truly simple projects), but you MUST present it and get approval.
Checklist
You MUST create a task for each of these items and complete them in order:
- Explore project context — check files, docs, recent commits
- Ask clarifying questions — one at a time, understand purpose/constraints/success criteria
- Propose 2-3 approaches — with trade-offs and your recommendation
- Present design — in sections scaled to their complexity, get user approval after each section
- Write design doc — save to
docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-design.mdand commit
Process Flow
digraph brainstorming {
"Explore project context" [shape=box];
"Ask clarifying questions" [shape=box];
"Propose 2-3 approaches" [shape=box];
"Present design sections" [shape=box];
"User approves design?" [shape=diamond];
"Write and commit design doc" [shape=box];
"Done" [shape=doublecircle];
"Explore project context" -> "Ask clarifying questions";
"Ask clarifying questions" -> "Propose 2-3 approaches";
"Propose 2-3 approaches" -> "Present design sections";
"Present design sections" -> "User approves design?";
"User approves design?" -> "Present design sections" [label="no, revise"];
"User approves design?" -> "Write and commit design doc" [label="yes"];
"Write and commit design doc" -> "Done";
}
The Process
Understanding the idea:
- Check out the current project state first (files, docs, recent commits)
- Ask questions one at a time to refine the idea
- Prefer multiple choice questions when possible, but open-ended is fine too
- Only one question per message — if a topic needs more exploration, break it into multiple questions
- Focus on understanding: purpose, constraints, success criteria
Exploring approaches:
- Propose 2-3 different approaches with trade-offs
- Present options conversationally with your recommendation and reasoning
- Lead with your recommended option and explain why
Presenting the design:
- Once you believe you understand what you're building, present the design
- Scale each section to its complexity: a few sentences if straightforward, up to 200-300 words if nuanced
- Ask after each section whether it looks right so far
- Cover: architecture, components, data flow, error handling, testing
- Be ready to go back and clarify if something doesn't make sense
After the Design
- Write the validated design to
docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-design.md - Use elements-of-style:writing-clearly-and-concisely skill if available
- Commit the design document to git
- You are done. Return control to the caller.
Next steps (for reference, not this skill's responsibility): The design doc feeds into /writing-plans for implementation planning, or directly into /software-forge if running the full lifecycle.
Key Principles
- One question at a time — Don't overwhelm with multiple questions
- Multiple choice preferred — Easier to answer than open-ended when possible
- YAGNI ruthlessly — Remove unnecessary features from all designs
- Explore alternatives — Always propose 2-3 approaches before settling
- Incremental validation — Present design, get approval before moving on
- Be flexible — Go back and clarify when something doesn't make sense
More from ahmedhamadto/software-forge
web-app-security-audit
Use when testing a web application for security vulnerabilities, before deployment or during security review — guides through a structured 10-phase penetration testing methodology covering mapping, authentication, session management, access controls, injection, logic flaws, and server configuration.
33ux-usability-review
Use when reviewing any interface for usability — walks through Krug's principles from Don't Make Me Think covering cognitive load, scanning, navigation, homepage clarity, mobile usability, accessibility, and the goodwill reservoir.
27ui-polish-review
Use when reviewing any web or app interface for visual quality — walks through Refactoring UI principles covering hierarchy, spacing, typography, color, depth, images, and finishing touches to elevate design from amateur to professional.
19voice-agent-prompt
Engineer system prompts for LiveKit voice agents with multilingual support. Use when creating or optimizing AI agent conversation flows.
15systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes
12subagent-driven-development
Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session
11