dev-plan by andreaserradev-gbj/dev-workflow

Step 0: Discover Project Root

bash "$DISCOVER" root

Where $DISCOVER is the absolute path to scripts/discover.sh within this skill's directory.

Path safety — shell state does not persist between tool calls, so you must provide full script paths on each call:

Use $HOME instead of the literal home directory (e.g., bash "$HOME/code/…/discover.sh", not bash "/Users/name/…/discover.sh"). This prevents username hallucination.
Copy values from tool output. When reusing a value returned by a previous command (like $PROJECT_ROOT), copy it verbatim from that command's output. Never retype a path from memory.
Verify on first call: if a script call fails with "No such file", the path is wrong — STOP and re-derive from the skill-loading context.
Never ignore a non-zero exit. If any script in this skill fails, stop and report the error before continuing.

Store the output as $PROJECT_ROOT. If the command fails, inform the user and stop.

PRIMARY DIRECTIVE

The sole deliverable is PRD files written to $PROJECT_ROOT/.dev/$FEATURE_NAME/. Produce documentation, not code. Every session must end with files on disk.

This is part of a 3-skill system (/dev-plan → /dev-checkpoint → /dev-resume). The other skills parse PRD files using status markers (⬜/✅), phase gates, file changes summary, and sub-PRD links.

Plan mode: If active, write a PRD summary to the plan file, call ExitPlanMode, then write full PRD files after approval.

AGENTS

This skill uses specialized agents for research and planning:

prd-researcher (cyan) — Researches codebase for patterns, dependencies, and reference implementations
prd-planner (green) — Designs implementation phases and file changes

Agent definitions are in agents/ within this skill's directory.

PHASE 1: UNDERSTAND

$ARGUMENTS

The 3 key questions for this phase:

What feature do you want to build? (Brief description)
What problem does it solve? (User need or business requirement)
Is there a reference implementation? (Existing code, similar feature)

Path A — Arguments were provided above

If $ARGUMENTS above is non-empty (the user provided a feature description):

Extrapolate answers to all 3 questions from the provided text.
Present a 2-3 sentence summary of your understanding.
Proceed directly to Phase 2. Do not ask for confirmation.

Path B — No arguments provided

If $ARGUMENTS above is empty (the user ran /dev-plan with no arguments):

Ask the 3 questions above.
STOP. Do not output anything else. Do not proceed until the user responds with their answers.
After receiving answers, summarize your understanding in 2-3 sentences.
Ask: "Does this capture your intent? Confirm and I'll start researching."
Do NOT move to Phase 2 until the user explicitly confirms.

Guardrail: Once confirmed (Path B) or summarized (Path A), move to research. Don't linger here.

Step 1.5: Derive and Validate `$FEATURE_NAME`

Before creating any directories or files, set a safe feature slug in $FEATURE_NAME.

Normalize and validate with the validation script:

bash "$VALIDATE" normalize "<candidate-name>"

Where $VALIDATE is the absolute path to scripts/validate.sh within this skill's directory. Apply the path safety rules from Step 0 ($HOME, copy from output). Outputs $FEATURE_NAME on success; on failure, STOP immediately — do not continue with an unvalidated path.

Rules:

Never use raw $ARGUMENTS directly in file paths.
Use $FEATURE_NAME for all .dev/ path references.

PHASE 2: RESEARCH

Launch 2-3 prd-researcher agents in parallel using the Task tool with different focuses:

Agent 1: "Find similar implementations and patterns to reuse for [feature]. Include file:line references."
Agent 2: "Identify architecture constraints, dependencies, and integration points for [feature]."
Agent 3: "List all files that will need modification for [feature] and what changes are needed."

Use subagent_type=dev-workflow:prd-researcher and model=sonnet for each agent.

After Agents Return

Synthesize findings — Combine agent outputs into a unified Research Summary
Present summary using this format:
- Patterns to reuse — existing code/architecture to leverage (with file:line refs)
- Files to modify — list of paths with 1-line descriptions
- Key decisions — 2-3 architectural choices needing confirmation
- Open questions — anything unclear (if any)

Keep it to ~10-15 lines.

STOP. Do not proceed to Phase 3 until the user confirms the research findings or provides corrections.

Guardrail: Research serves the PRD. Move to writing after one research round. If deeper investigation is requested, do one more round — then write.

PHASE 3: WRITE THE PRD

Launch 1 prd-planner agent to design the implementation structure:

"Design implementation phases for [feature].
Research findings: [summarize key patterns and files from Phase 2].
Determine if this needs sub-PRDs (complex) or a single PRD (simple)."

Use subagent_type=dev-workflow:prd-planner.

After Agent Returns

Review agent output — Verify phases are logical and complete
Propose architecture approach — Present the recommended structure to the user

STOP. Do not create any files until the user confirms the architecture approach or requests adjustments.

Create files under $PROJECT_ROOT/.dev/$FEATURE_NAME/:
- Always create 00-master-plan.md — use the Master Plan template in prd-templates.md
- For complex features, create 01-sub-prd-[name].md etc. — use the Sub-PRD template in prd-templates.md
- Incorporate research findings (Phase 2) and implementation plan (agent output) into the PRD
State what was created — list every file path written.
Suggest running /dev-checkpoint to save a continuation prompt.

Guardrail: Files MUST be created. If this phase is reached without writing, stop everything else and write the PRD.

RULES

One round of research, then write — do NOT research endlessly
Fold research findings into the master plan's "Research Findings" section (no separate findings.md)

PRIVACY RULES

NEVER include in PRD files — use safe alternatives:

Absolute paths with usernames → use relative paths from project root
Secrets, API keys, tokens, credentials → use placeholders (<API_KEY>, $ENV_VAR)
Personal information (names, emails) → use generic references

dev-plan