vet

The Vet skill appears broadly coherent with its stated purpose of proactively vetting changes by analyzing git diffs and conversation history. The primary concerns relate to (1) potential leakage of sensitive session/history data through local history-loader scripts, and (2) a possible documentation typo (uv) in installation steps. If these risks are mitigated (restricting history data exposure, ensuring history loaders redact sensitive content, and correcting installation commands to industry-standard tooling), the skill remains functionally appropriate and relatively benign. Overall, I classify this as Suspicious rather than Malicious due to data-exposure concerns that need clarification, but the core intent and data flows align with the described purpose.