ollama-multi-model-writer
SKILL.md
Ollama Multi-Model Research Writer
Route each research paper section to the locally-running Ollama model best suited for that task, then synthesize outputs into a unified manuscript — all on your local GPU, no cloud APIs required.
Model Roles
| Model | Tag | Primary Role | Best Sections |
|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek-R1 | deepseek-r1:7b |
Scientific reasoning & data analysis | Methods, Results, Experiment Design, Ablations |
| Phi-4-reasoning | phi4-reasoning |
PhD-level structured writing | Abstract, Introduction, Conclusions, Related Work |
| GLM-4.7-Flash | glm4:9b-chat-q4_K_M |
Fluent drafting & synthesis | Full-section drafts, cross-section polish, consistency pass |
Prerequisites
Before starting, verify Ollama and the required models are available:
# Check Ollama is running
ollama list
# Pull any missing models
ollama pull deepseek-r1:7b
ollama pull phi4-reasoning
ollama pull glm4:9b-chat-q4_K_M
If Ollama is not installed or a model is missing, surface the error to the user and halt. Do not proceed with a partial model set.
Section Routing Table
| Paper Section | Primary Model | Backup Model |
|---|---|---|
| Abstract | phi4-reasoning |
glm4:9b-chat-q4_K_M |
| Introduction | phi4-reasoning |
glm4:9b-chat-q4_K_M |
| Related Work | phi4-reasoning |
glm4:9b-chat-q4_K_M |
| Methodology | deepseek-r1:7b |
glm4:9b-chat-q4_K_M |
| Experimental Setup | deepseek-r1:7b |
glm4:9b-chat-q4_K_M |
| Results & Discussion | deepseek-r1:7b |
glm4:9b-chat-q4_K_M |
| Ablation Study | deepseek-r1:7b |
glm4:9b-chat-q4_K_M |
| Conclusion | phi4-reasoning |
glm4:9b-chat-q4_K_M |
| Full-paper synthesis | glm4:9b-chat-q4_K_M |
— |
Use the backup model if the primary model is not pulled or fails to respond.
Workflow
Phase 1 — Reasoning Pass (DeepSeek-R1)
Run DeepSeek-R1 on the technical core of the paper. Save output as {reasoning_output}.
# Step 1a: Extract key claims and structure from the research idea
./scripts/ollama-runner.sh deepseek-r1:7b \
"Analyze this research idea. Extract: (1) the core technical claim, (2) the key methodological steps, (3) what experiments would validate it, (4) what metrics matter. Be precise and scientific. Research idea: {user_idea}"
# Step 1b: Draft the Methods section
./scripts/ollama-runner.sh deepseek-r1:7b \
"Write a detailed Methodology section for a research paper. Include: problem formulation with formal notation, the proposed approach step-by-step, the training objective or loss function if applicable, and complexity analysis. Use [PLACEHOLDER] for any unknown details. Context: {reasoning_output}"
# Step 1c: Draft Results section (if experiment data is provided)
./scripts/ollama-runner.sh deepseek-r1:7b \
"Write a Results and Discussion section. Present and interpret the following experiment results honestly. Quantify improvements with exact numbers. Identify failure cases. Results data: {results_data}"
Phase 2 — Structure Pass (Phi-4-reasoning)
Run Phi-4-reasoning to build the academic skeleton. Save output as {structured_output}.
# Step 2a: Write the Abstract
./scripts/ollama-runner.sh phi4-reasoning \
"Write a 200-word abstract using exactly this 5-part structure: (1) Motivation — why this problem matters, (2) Problem — the precise challenge, (3) Approach — the key method named explicitly, (4) Results — concrete findings with numbers or [RESULT NEEDED], (5) Significance — what this enables. No citations. Spell out all acronyms. Context: {reasoning_output}"
# Step 2b: Write the Introduction
./scripts/ollama-runner.sh phi4-reasoning \
"Write an Introduction section with: (1) a concrete opening hook, (2) precise problem statement, (3) limitations of prior work with citations, (4) a bulleted list of 3-5 verifiable contributions each starting with a verb (We propose, We demonstrate, We show), (5) one-sentence paper outline. Context: {reasoning_output}"
# Step 2c: Write the Conclusion
./scripts/ollama-runner.sh phi4-reasoning \
"Write a Conclusion section with: (1) a summary of the problem and approach in fresh language (do not repeat the abstract), (2) key takeaways for practitioners, (3) 2-3 concrete future work directions each one sentence. Do not introduce new claims or results. Context: {reasoning_output} {results_output}"
Phase 3 — Synthesis & Polish Pass (GLM-4.7-Flash)
Run GLM-4.7-Flash to unify all sections into a coherent manuscript. Save output as {synthesis_output}.
# Step 3a: Synthesize all sections into one draft
./scripts/ollama-runner.sh glm4:9b-chat-q4_K_M \
"You are editing a research paper. Unify these independently-written sections into a single coherent manuscript. Ensure: consistent terminology throughout, the abstract matches the conclusion, all contributions in the introduction appear in the results, no repetition between sections. Sections: REASONING: {reasoning_output} STRUCTURED: {structured_output}"
# Step 3b: Cross-section consistency check
./scripts/ollama-runner.sh glm4:9b-chat-q4_K_M \
"Review this research paper draft and flag: (1) terminology inconsistencies, (2) claims in the introduction not supported by the results, (3) abstract statements not matching the paper content, (4) any [PLACEHOLDER] or [RESULT NEEDED] tags. List each issue with the section name and line. Draft: {synthesis_output}"
Running a Single Section
When the user asks for one section only, skip the full pipeline:
# Abstract only
./scripts/ollama-runner.sh phi4-reasoning \
"$(cat templates/abstract-template.md)" \
"Research context: {user_input}"
# Methods only
./scripts/ollama-runner.sh deepseek-r1:7b \
"$(cat templates/methods-template.md)" \
"Research context: {user_input}"
# Any section — quick draft
./scripts/ollama-runner.sh glm4:9b-chat-q4_K_M \
"Draft the {section_name} section for a research paper. Academic tone, precise language. Research context: {user_input}"
Integration with the Lead Researcher Pipeline
When operating inside the lead-researcher pipeline as Stage 7c:
Trigger: User says they want a local/GPU workflow, or Ollama is confirmed available.
Inputs received from prior stages:
| Input | Source Stage |
|---|---|
| Research Brief | Stage 1 |
| Finalized hypothesis | Stage 2 |
| Literature synthesis & gap statement | Stage 3 |
| Experiment plan | Stage 5 |
| Results summary | User-provided or Stage 6 |
Actions:
- Confirm Ollama is running and all three models are available.
- Run Phase 1 (DeepSeek-R1) with the hypothesis + experiment plan as context.
- Run Phase 2 (Phi-4-reasoning) with the reasoning output.
- Run Phase 3 (GLM-4.7-Flash) to synthesize all phases.
- Write the manuscript to
paper-{topic}-draft.md. - Report draft location and all
[PLACEHOLDER]/[RESULT NEEDED]tags back tolead-researcher.
Optionally hand off to ieee-paper-generator for IEEE formatting after the draft is complete.
Output Format
Save the manuscript as paper-{topic}-draft.md using this structure:
# [Paper Title]
## Abstract
[150-250 words, 5-part structure — generated by phi4-reasoning]
## 1. Introduction
[Generated by phi4-reasoning]
## 2. Related Work
[Generated by phi4-reasoning]
## 3. Methodology
[Generated by deepseek-r1]
## 4. Experimental Setup
[Generated by deepseek-r1]
## 5. Results and Discussion
[Generated by deepseek-r1]
## 6. Conclusion
[Generated by phi4-reasoning]
## References
[Numbered in order of appearance — user must supply actual citations]
---
## Model Attribution
| Section | Model Used |
|---------|-----------|
| Abstract | phi4-reasoning |
| Introduction | phi4-reasoning |
| Methodology | deepseek-r1:7b |
| Results | deepseek-r1:7b |
| Conclusion | phi4-reasoning |
| Synthesis pass | glm4:9b-chat-q4_K_M |
## Data Gaps
[List all [PLACEHOLDER] and [RESULT NEEDED] tags with section references]
## Cross-Validation Flags
[List any inconsistencies detected in the Phase 3 consistency check]
No Fabrication Policy
- Never invent experimental results, benchmark scores, or ablation numbers.
- Never generate fake citations, paper titles, or author names.
- Mark all missing data with
[RESULT NEEDED: description]. - Mark all unknown details with
[PLACEHOLDER: description]. - All quantitative claims in the paper must come from the user's actual experiments.