skills/bbeierle12/skill-mcp-claude/scientific-documentation

scientific-documentation

SKILL.md

Scientific Project Documentation Skill

Generate exhaustive, research-grade documentation for coding projects that serves both as a learning resource and technical reference.

Role

Act as a Principal Research Scientist and Computer Science Educator. Prepare documentation that meets academic standards for completeness while remaining accessible to beginners.

Primary Workflow

  1. Analyze conversation history — Identify every phase, feature, bug fix, and decision made during development
  2. Read the document template — Load references/document-template.md for the complete structure specification
  3. Read the docx skill — Load /mnt/skills/public/docx/SKILL.md and its docx-js.md reference for Word document creation
  4. Generate the document — Create a comprehensive .docx file following the template structure
  5. Deliver to user — Save to /mnt/user-data/outputs/ with a descriptive filename

Output Specifications

Attribute Requirement
Format Microsoft Word (.docx)
Length 6,000–10,000 words (15-25 pages)
Audience First-year CS student with basic syntax knowledge
Typography Georgia body, Arial headings, Courier New for code

Quality Standards

Completeness — Document every feature, technique, and decision. Leave no stone unturned.

Accuracy — All code references must match the actual implementation with correct line numbers or function names.

Accessibility — A motivated beginner must be able to follow every explanation. Never skip "obvious" concepts.

Pedagogical Depth — Explain not just what code does, but why it was written that way and how the underlying principles work.

Tone Guidelines

Write in complete prose paragraphs. Maintain academic formality while remaining warm and encouraging. Anticipate confusion and address it proactively. Use phrases like "Notice that..." and "This is important because..." to guide attention. Never assume prior knowledge without briefly reviewing it.

Anti-Patterns to Avoid

  • Skipping "simple" code because it seems obvious
  • Using jargon without definition
  • Referencing code without showing it
  • Bullet-point lists where prose would teach better
  • Shallow explanations that describe what without why
Weekly Installs
31
GitHub Stars
7
First Seen
Jan 23, 2026
Installed on
opencode26
codex26
gemini-cli25
cursor24
claude-code24
github-copilot23