codex-code-review
Audited by Socket on Feb 16, 2026
1 alert found:
Malware[Skill Scanner] Installation of third-party script detected This skill is internally consistent: its capabilities, required inputs (repository code, OPENAI_API_KEY), and outputs (review results, GitHub comments) match the stated purpose of automated code review via Codex. I found no hardcoded secrets, obfuscated code, or direct evidence of backdoors or exfiltration beyond the intended flow to Codex/OpenAI and GitHub. The main supply-chain risk is use of an external GitHub Action referenced by a floating tag (openai/codex-action@v1) with access to repo contents and secrets; pinning to a commit and restricting permissions would reduce that risk. Overall, the artifact appears benign but CI/action usage raises a moderate supply-chain caution. LLM verification: This skill's behavior is consistent with its stated purpose (automated AI code review). The main security concern is supply-chain and data-exposure risk: it requires an OpenAI API key and routes repository content and PR diffs to an external Codex/OpenAI service via a CLI and a GitHub Action. That is expected for the feature, but it means you must trust the CLI/action publisher and ensure no sensitive secrets or PII are inadvertently sent. The package/action provenance is not pinned or audited i