Docpact

Use docpact directly for the product's three main workflow phases:

before coding
after coding
ongoing trust checks

This skill is the product-facing entrypoint. It is not the governance-maintainer router, and it is not a replacement for the CLI. Its job is to choose the correct existing docpact command first, then load the correct internal direct-workflow reference or escalate to docpact-governance only when the problem is no longer a normal task workflow.

Modeling Boundary

Apply the product modeling boundary before treating a question as governance authoring work.

deterministic governance facts belong in config
explanatory material belongs in source docs
render stays a read-only derived-view layer, not a new truth source

If the problem becomes "where should this information live?", apply those three checks first, then move to docpact-governance instead of inventing a new direct-workflow path.

Workflow Map

1. Before coding: decide what to read

Use route when the agent is about to make a change and needs the minimum relevant reading set.

Choose the smallest stable input:

--paths <csv> for explicit target files or path globs
--module <csv> for a repo-relative module prefix
--intent <csv> only when the repo already defines controlled aliases in routing.intents

Default commands:

docpact route --root <repo> --paths <csv> --format json
docpact route --root <repo> --module <prefix> --format json
docpact route --root <repo> --intent <alias> --format json

Use --detail full only when you need the score breakdown, matched triggers, or provenance. Start with compact JSON for agent efficiency.

If the task only needs a shorter derived summary over the existing navigation result, use render instead of inventing a new route shape:

docpact render --root <repo> --view navigation-summary --paths <csv> --format json
docpact render --root <repo> --view navigation-summary --module <prefix> --format text

Use render here only as a read-only summary layer over the same route pipeline. It does not replace route when full recommendation JSON or explanation detail is required.

If the repository does not have useful routing behavior yet, do not invent new route semantics here. Move to:

docpact-governance with the routing-configuration workflow when the task is "define or fix controlled intent aliases"
docpact-governance with the rule-authoring workflow when the route result is weak because the rule graph is weak

2. After coding: determine what should have changed

Use lint when the agent has made or plans to validate a concrete change.

lint always needs one explicit diff source:

--files <csv>
--staged
--worktree
--merge-base <ref>
--base <sha> --head <sha>

Default command pattern:

docpact lint --root <repo> <diff-source-args> --format json --output .docpact/runs/latest.json

Use a saved report path whenever the result may need drill-down.

If lint returns findings and you need to inspect one exact result, move immediately to:

docpact diagnostics show --report .docpact/runs/latest.json --id <diagnostic_id> --format json

If the task becomes "repair this one finding," stay inside this skill and load references/failure-repair-workflow.md. Treat it as an internal remediation workflow, not as a separate entrypoint.

3. After coding: record completed review evidence

Use review mark only after a review has actually been completed.

Prefer the diagnostics-driven form when the review comes from one explicit lint finding:

docpact review mark --root <repo> --report .docpact/runs/latest.json --id <diagnostic_id>

Use explicit path mode only when you genuinely know the document path without going through diagnostics:

docpact review mark --root <repo> --path docs/api.md

Do not use review mark for:

uncovered-change
missing rules
speculative review completion

After recording review evidence, rerun lint with the same diff source.

4. Ongoing: check whether governed docs have gone stale

Use freshness when the task is not about one immediate code diff, but about whether governed documents still look trustworthy.

Default command:

docpact freshness --root <repo> --format json

Use this when:

deciding whether docs are safe to trust before a broad task
triaging stale governance debt
checking whether review references are invalid

If the freshness result leads to stale-doc remediation, config work, or rule maintenance, that is no longer a direct workflow problem. Hand off to docpact-governance and select the appropriate maintainer workflow reference instead of forcing the direct workflow path.

5. Read-only summaries when you need compact context

Use render when you already know the question is about short derived context, not full governance evaluation.

Typical commands:

docpact render --root <repo> --view catalog-summary --format json
docpact render --root <repo> --view ownership-summary --format json
docpact render --root <repo> --view workspace-summary --format text

Use this path when you need:

deterministic repo entry and workflow pointers from catalog
ownership-domain summary without running full route detail
a short workspace-facing summary over catalog and ownership facts

Do not use render as a replacement for:

route when you still need the governed/advisory recommendation set
lint when you need governance judgment
freshness when you need stale-doc evaluation

Handoff Rules

Stay in this direct workflow skill when the question is:

what should I read first?
what docs should this change have touched?
what does this one finding mean?
how do I record completed review evidence?
are these governed docs stale?

If the task turns into a modeling-boundary question, classify it as config, source docs, or derived views first. Then move to docpact-governance rather than forcing the answer through route, lint, or render.

Move to docpact-governance when the question becomes:

which governance-maintainer workflow should we use for this repository problem?
how do we onboard this repository?
how should we design or change rules?
how should we turn uncovered hotspots into backlog?
how should we maintain routing aliases?
how healthy is the current rule graph?
how should we remediate stale docs or invalid review references?
how should we design or review CI integration?

For broad governance-maintainer work, hand off to docpact-governance. Do not expose separate selection for the sub-workflows; let the governance entrypoint route internally.

Read:

Output Requirements

Always include:

which workflow phase this task belongs to: before-coding, after-coding, or ongoing
the first CLI command to run
the minimum required inputs for that command
whether a saved report artifact is needed
whether the task should remain in direct workflow, use the internal failure-repair workflow, or hand off to docpact-governance

When the first command is render, state which derived view is the smallest correct one.

Use the templates in assets/ instead of inventing a new output structure each time.

docpact