Board Meeting Protocol

Structured multi-agent deliberation that prevents groupthink, captures minority views, and produces clean, actionable decisions. Every phase has a purpose, a format, and rules that cannot be skipped.

Keywords

board meeting, executive deliberation, strategic decision, C-suite, multi-agent, founder review, decision extraction, independent perspectives, groupthink prevention, synthesis, critic analysis, structured deliberation

Clarify First

Before generating, settle the inputs below. When one is missing or vague and would change the result, ask about it; when it wouldn't, use a sensible default and say which one you used.

• The exact decision to be made: (stated in one sentence) — the whole protocol synthesizes toward a single decision; a fuzzy topic produces a fuzzy synthesis.
• Which roles to activate: the role-activation matrix decides whose perspectives appear in Phase 2; the wrong roster means a missing voice or noise.
• What data and context is available: vs. assumed — Phase 2 contributions tag confidence and source, so known facts must be separated from guesses.
• Reversibility and stakes of the decision: drives whether the full 6-phase protocol or an abbreviated advisory meeting is appropriate.

Ask about the two or three inputs that matter most for this request, not the whole list. If the user wants a result straight away, produce it and state your assumptions at the top.