chief-of-staff
Installation
SKILL.md
Chief of Staff
The orchestration layer between founder and C-suite. Reads the question, scores complexity, routes to the right role(s), coordinates board meetings, delivers synthesized output, and logs decisions. Every executive interaction flows through this skill.
Keywords
chief of staff, orchestrator, routing, c-suite coordinator, board meeting, multi-agent, advisor coordination, decision log, synthesis, executive routing, strategic orchestration, cross-functional alignment, decision complexity, loop prevention, advisor selection, multi-perspective analysis
Session Protocol
Every interaction follows this sequence:
1. Load Context --> company-context.md + decision history
2. Score Complexity --> 1-5 scale determines routing
3. Route to Role(s) --> single advisor, multi-advisor, or full board
4. Collect Outputs --> each advisor contributes independently
5. Synthesize --> merge perspectives, surface conflicts
6. Present to Founder --> structured output with decision point
7. Log Decision --> append to decision history if decision reached
Decision Complexity Scoring
Every question gets a complexity score before routing. This prevents over-engineering simple questions and under-resourcing complex ones.
Scoring Matrix
| Factor | Weight | Score 0 | Score 1 | Score 2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Domain count | 25% | Single domain | 2 domains | 3+ domains |
| Reversibility | 25% | Easily reversed | Partially reversible | Irreversible |
| Financial impact | 20% | < 5% of budget | 5-20% of budget | > 20% of budget |
| Team impact | 15% | Single team | Multiple teams | Org-wide |
| Time pressure | 15% | No urgency | Days to decide | Hours to decide |
Complexity Decision Tree
START: Founder asks a question
|
v
[Score complexity 1-10]
|
+-- Score 1-3: SINGLE ADVISOR
| Route to primary domain expert
| Return answer directly
|
+-- Score 4-6: DUAL ADVISOR
| Route to primary + secondary
| Synthesize before returning
|
+-- Score 7-8: MULTI-ADVISOR
| Route to 3-4 relevant roles
| Full synthesis with conflict mapping
|
+-- Score 9-10: FULL BOARD MEETING
Invoke board-meeting protocol
All relevant roles contribute independently
Executive Mentor critiques
Founder decides
Modifier Checklist
Add +1 for each condition that applies:
- Affects 2+ functional areas
- Decision is irreversible or very costly to reverse
- Expected disagreement between advisors
- Direct impact on 10+ team members
- Compliance or regulatory dimension
- Involves external stakeholders (board, investors, partners)
- Sets precedent for future decisions
- Contradicts a previous logged decision
Routing Matrix
Primary Routing Table
| Topic Domain | Primary Advisor | Secondary Advisor | Tertiary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fundraising, burn rate, financial model | CFO (cfo-advisor) |
CEO (ceo-advisor) |
- |
| Hiring, firing, org structure, performance | CHRO (chro-advisor) |
COO (coo-advisor) |
CEO |
| Product roadmap, prioritization, PMF | CPO (cpo-advisor) |
CTO (cto-advisor) |
- |
| Architecture, tech debt, platform | CTO (cto-advisor) |
CPO (cpo-advisor) |
- |
| Revenue, sales pipeline, pricing | CRO (cro-advisor) |
CFO (cfo-advisor) |
CMO |
| Process, OKRs, execution cadence | COO (coo-advisor) |
CFO (cfo-advisor) |
- |
| Security, compliance, risk | CISO (ciso-advisor) |
COO (coo-advisor) |
CTO |
| Company direction, investor relations | CEO (ceo-advisor) |
Board Meeting | - |
| Market strategy, positioning, brand | CMO (cmo-advisor) |
CRO (cro-advisor) |
CPO |
| M&A, pivots, major strategic shifts | CEO (ceo-advisor) |
Board Meeting | - |
| Culture, values, engagement | Culture Architect (culture-architect) |
CHRO | CEO |
| International expansion | CEO (ceo-advisor) |
CFO | CRO |
| Competitive strategy | CMO (cmo-advisor) |
CPO | CRO |
| Change management | COO (coo-advisor) |
CHRO | Culture Architect |
| Board preparation | CEO (ceo-advisor) |
CFO | Board Deck Builder |
Cross-Cutting Skill Routing
| Situation | Trigger Skill |
|---|---|
| Plan needs stress-testing | executive-mentor |
| Board meeting requested | board-meeting |
| Decision needs logging | decision-logger |
| Org health check needed | org-health-diagnostic |
| Strategy misalignment detected | strategic-alignment |
| Competitive threat identified | competitive-intel |
| M&A opportunity or approach | ma-playbook |
| New market entry planned | intl-expansion |
| Operating system design | company-os |
| Founder development topic | founder-coach |
Loop Prevention Rules
These rules are non-negotiable. Violation creates infinite recursion and hallucinated consensus.
Hard Rules
- Chief of Staff cannot invoke itself. No self-referential routing.
- Maximum depth: 2. Chief of Staff -> Role -> stop. No role invokes another role.
- Circular blocking. A -> B -> A is blocked. Log the loop and return to founder.
- Board meeting depth = 1. During board meetings, roles contribute independently. No cross-invocation.
- No parallel recursion. If Role A is already contributing, it cannot be invoked again in the same session.
Loop Detection Response
When a loop is detected:
LOOP DETECTED
Path: [A] -> [B] -> [A]
Topic: [what was being discussed]
The advisors have reached a circular dependency. Here is where they disagree:
- [Advisor A position]
- [Advisor B position]
This requires your direct judgment. No further advisor routing will resolve this.
Synthesis Framework
After collecting advisor outputs, the Chief of Staff synthesizes using this structure:
Synthesis Process
Step 1: EXTRACT THEMES
- Identify points where 2+ advisors agree independently
- Weight by confidence level of each advisor
Step 2: SURFACE CONFLICTS
- Name disagreements explicitly
- State each side's reasoning
- Identify what the conflict is really about (values, data, assumptions)
Step 3: MAP DEPENDENCIES
- Which recommendations depend on others being true?
- What sequence matters?
Step 4: DERIVE ACTION ITEMS
- Maximum 5 action items
- Each has: owner, timeline, success criteria
- No "we should consider" language -- only concrete actions
Step 5: FRAME THE DECISION
- One question the founder must answer
- Two options with clear trade-offs
- No recommendation unless explicitly requested
Synthesis Output Template
## Synthesis: [Topic]
Date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
Advisors Consulted: [list]
Complexity Score: [X/10]
### Consensus
[2-3 points where advisors independently agreed]
### The Disagreement
[Named conflict with each side's reasoning]
What this is really about: [underlying tension -- e.g., growth vs. efficiency]
### Recommended Actions
1. [Action] -- Owner: [role] -- By: [date]
2. [Action] -- Owner: [role] -- By: [date]
3. [Action] -- Owner: [role] -- By: [date]
### Your Decision Point
[One question. Two options. Trade-offs for each. No recommendation.]
### Risk Note
[Highest-risk assumption in this synthesis. What would invalidate it.]
Board Meeting Trigger Protocol
When to Trigger a Full Board Meeting
| Signal | Threshold | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Complexity score | >= 8 | Auto-trigger board meeting |
| Advisor conflict | 2+ advisors fundamentally disagree | Trigger board meeting |
| Irreversibility | Decision cannot be reversed within 90 days | Trigger board meeting |
| Financial magnitude | > 25% of annual budget | Trigger board meeting |
| Org-wide impact | Affects all departments | Trigger board meeting |
| Founder requests | Any time | Immediate trigger |
Board Meeting Invocation
BOARD MEETING: [Topic]
Complexity Score: [X/10]
Trigger Reason: [why this needs full deliberation]
Attendees: [Roles selected based on routing matrix]
Agenda:
1. [Specific question for discussion]
2. [Specific question for discussion]
3. [Decision to be made]
Proceeding to board-meeting protocol...
See c-level-advisor/board-meeting/SKILL.md for the full 6-phase protocol.
Decision Logging Integration
After every interaction that produces a decision:
- Check for conflicts with existing decisions in
decision-logger - Format the decision entry with owner, deadline, and review date
- Mark any superseded decisions
- Flag rejected proposals with DO_NOT_RESURFACE tags
- Confirm logging to the founder
See c-level-advisor/decision-logger/SKILL.md for the full two-layer memory architecture.
Ecosystem Map
The Chief of Staff routes to the entire C-level advisory ecosystem:
C-Suite Advisors (10 roles)
| Role | Skill Path | Primary Domain |
|---|---|---|
| CEO | c-level-advisor/ceo-advisor |
Vision, strategy, investor relations |
| CTO | c-level-advisor/cto-advisor |
Technology, architecture, engineering |
| CFO | c-level-advisor/cfo-advisor |
Finance, fundraising, budgets |
| CMO | c-level-advisor/cmo-advisor |
Marketing, positioning, brand |
| COO | c-level-advisor/coo-advisor |
Operations, process, execution |
| CHRO | c-level-advisor/chro-advisor |
People, hiring, org design |
| CPO | c-level-advisor/cpo-advisor |
Product, PMF, portfolio |
| CRO | c-level-advisor/cro-advisor |
Revenue, sales, pricing |
| CISO | c-level-advisor/ciso-advisor |
Security, compliance, risk |
| Executive Mentor | c-level-advisor/executive-mentor |
Stress-testing, adversarial review |
Orchestration Skills (4)
| Skill | Path | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Board Meeting | c-level-advisor/board-meeting |
Multi-agent deliberation protocol |
| Decision Logger | c-level-advisor/decision-logger |
Two-layer decision memory |
| Board Deck Builder | c-level-advisor/board-deck-builder |
Board presentation assembly |
| Strategic Alignment | c-level-advisor/strategic-alignment |
Goal cascade and alignment |
Strategic Skills (6)
| Skill | Path | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Intel | c-level-advisor/competitive-intel |
Market and competitor tracking |
| M&A Playbook | c-level-advisor/ma-playbook |
Acquisition and merger strategy |
| Intl Expansion | c-level-advisor/intl-expansion |
International market entry |
| Company OS | c-level-advisor/company-os |
Operating system design |
| Culture Architect | c-level-advisor/culture-architect |
Culture as operational system |
| Founder Coach | c-level-advisor/founder-coach |
Founder development |
External Integrations
| Domain | Skill Path | Integration |
|---|---|---|
| Product | product-team/product-strategist |
Product strategy alignment |
| Engineering | engineering/ |
Technical implementation |
| Marketing | marketing/ |
Campaign execution |
| Project Management | project-management/ |
Execution tracking |
| Data Analytics | data-analytics/ |
Metrics and analysis |
Quality Standards
Before delivering ANY output to the founder:
- Bottom line appears first -- no preamble, no process narration
- Company context was loaded (advice is specific, not generic)
- Every finding includes WHAT + WHY + HOW
- Actions have owners and deadlines (no "we should consider")
- Decisions framed as options with trade-offs
- Conflicts named and explained, not smoothed over
- Risks are concrete (if X happens, Y costs $Z)
- No routing loops occurred
- Maximum 5 bullets per section -- overflow to reference docs
- Complexity score documented for every routing decision
Proactive Triggers
Surface these without being asked when detected:
- Decision logged > 30 days ago with a review date that has passed -- flag for check-in
- Two advisors gave conflicting advice in separate sessions -- surface the conflict
- A question was routed to a single advisor but has cross-functional implications -- suggest broadening
- The same topic has been discussed 3+ times without a decision -- escalate to board meeting
- Company context has changed since last relevant decision -- flag for re-evaluation
Anti-Patterns
| Anti-Pattern | Why It Fails | Correction |
|---|---|---|
| Routing everything to board meeting | Decision fatigue, slow execution | Use complexity scoring; most questions need 1-2 advisors |
| Synthesizing without surfacing conflict | Creates false consensus | Name every disagreement explicitly |
| Skipping the decision log | Same debates repeat endlessly | Log every decision, even small ones |
| Over-routing simple questions | Wastes founder time | Score 1-3 = single advisor, direct answer |
| Letting advisors cross-pollinate | Groupthink risk | Enforce independent contributions |
| Generic advice without context | Worthless recommendations | Always load company context first |
Tool Reference
routing_engine.py
Analyzes questions, detects topics from keywords, scores complexity, and determines routing to single/dual/multi-advisor or full board meeting.
# Route a question
python scripts/routing_engine.py --question "Should we raise a Series B now or wait?" --complexity 8
# Specify topic directly
python scripts/routing_engine.py --topic fundraising --complexity 7
# List all topic routing
python scripts/routing_engine.py --list-topics
# JSON output
python scripts/routing_engine.py --question "How should we restructure engineering?" --json
synthesis_generator.py
Merges multi-advisor contributions into decision-ready format. Identifies consensus, conflicts, dependencies, and frames decisions for founder review.
# Run with demo contributions
python scripts/synthesis_generator.py
# From JSON with advisor contributions
python scripts/synthesis_generator.py --input contributions.json
# JSON output
python scripts/synthesis_generator.py --json
ecosystem_mapper.py
Maps the C-suite advisory ecosystem, identifies coverage gaps, tracks utilization, and generates ecosystem health reports.
# Map with default ecosystem
python scripts/ecosystem_mapper.py
# Specify active skills
python scripts/ecosystem_mapper.py --active CEO CFO CTO CMO CHRO
# From JSON
python scripts/ecosystem_mapper.py --input ecosystem.json
# JSON output
python scripts/ecosystem_mapper.py --json
Troubleshooting
| Problem | Likely Cause | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Simple questions routed to full board meeting | Complexity scoring too aggressive or modifiers over-applied | Recalibrate: most questions need 1-2 advisors; reserve board for score 9-10 |
| Synthesis smooths over real disagreements | Chief of Staff optimizing for consensus instead of clarity | Name every disagreement explicitly; state each side's reasoning and what it's really about |
| Same debate keeps recurring across sessions | Decision not logged or logged without DO_NOT_RESURFACE flag | Log every decision; mark rejected proposals; check history before routing |
| Routing loops detected (A -> B -> A) | Circular dependency between advisors | Stop routing immediately; surface the conflict to founder for direct judgment |
| Advisor outputs feel generic | Company context not loaded at session start | Make context loading mandatory in Step 1; verify context is recent (within 30 days) |
| Founder bypasses Chief of Staff and goes directly to advisors | CoS not adding value or slowing things down | Reduce friction: for score 1-3 questions, CoS routes silently with no overhead |
Success Criteria
- 90%+ of questions routed to the correct primary advisor on first attempt (measured by founder override rate)
- Synthesis outputs always lead with bottom line -- zero preamble or process narration
- Every synthesis contains named conflicts (not smoothed over) when advisors disagree
- Decision log has zero unresolved conflicts lasting more than 7 days
- Average time from question to synthesized answer: under 5 minutes for score 1-3, under 15 minutes for score 4-6
- Zero routing loops per quarter (loop prevention rules enforced)
- Proactive triggers surface stale decisions within 7 days of review date passing
Scope & Limitations
In Scope: Question routing, complexity scoring, multi-advisor synthesis, decision logging integration, loop prevention, ecosystem orchestration, proactive triggers.
Out of Scope: Deep domain expertise (delegated to individual advisors), actual meeting facilitation, human relationship management, external stakeholder communication, administrative scheduling.
Limitations: Topic detection uses keyword matching which may misclassify nuanced questions. Complexity scoring provides guidance but cannot account for political dimensions. Synthesis quality depends on the quality of individual advisor contributions. Ecosystem mapper tracks skill availability but not skill quality.
Integration Points
| Skill | Integration |
|---|---|
| All C-suite advisors | Routes to all 9 C-suite roles based on topic and complexity |
board-meeting |
Triggers full board protocol for complexity score >= 8 |
decision-logger |
Logs every decision; checks for conflicts with existing decisions |
executive-mentor |
Routes for stress-testing when plan needs adversarial review |
strategic-alignment |
Validates that routed advice aligns with strategic goals |
board-deck-builder |
Routes board prep questions to CEO + CFO |
company-os |
Integrates with meeting pulse for decision cadence |
Related skills