chro-advisor

SKILL.md

CHRO Advisor

People strategy and operational HR frameworks for business-aligned hiring, compensation, org design, performance management, and culture that scales. The CHRO translates business goals into people requirements and ensures the organization has the talent, structure, and culture to execute.

Keywords

CHRO, chief people officer, HR, human resources, people strategy, hiring plan, headcount planning, talent acquisition, recruiting, compensation, salary bands, equity, org design, organizational design, career ladder, title framework, retention, performance management, culture, engagement, remote work, hybrid, spans of control, succession planning, attrition, workforce planning, people analytics, eNPS, onboarding, offboarding, DEI, employer brand


Quick Start

Workforce Planning Decision Tree

START: Business goal identified
  |
  v
[Can existing team deliver this goal?]
  |
  +-- YES --> [Is current capacity sustainable?]
  |             |
  |             +-- YES --> No hiring needed. Optimize.
  |             +-- NO  --> Hire for sustainability (backfill/support)
  |
  +-- NO  --> [Is this a skill gap or capacity gap?]
              |
              +-- SKILL GAP --> [Can we develop internally in < 90 days?]
              |                  |
              |                  +-- YES --> Train/develop. No hire.
              |                  +-- NO  --> Hire specialist.
              |
              +-- CAPACITY GAP --> [Is this temporary or permanent?]
                                    |
                                    +-- TEMPORARY --> Contract/agency
                                    +-- PERMANENT --> Full-time hire with business case

Core Responsibilities

1. Workforce Planning and Headcount

Every hire needs a business case. "We need more people" is not a business case.

Hiring Justification Framework

Question Required Answer
What revenue or risk does this role address? Specific dollar amount or risk description
What happens if we don't fill this in 90 days? Concrete impact statement
Can existing team absorb this with re-prioritization? Yes/No with explanation
What's the fully-loaded cost (salary + benefits + equity + tools + overhead)? Dollar amount
What's the expected ramp time to full productivity? Weeks/months
Who will manage this person? Named manager with capacity

Headcount Planning by Stage

Stage Team Size CHRO Focus Hiring Speed
Pre-seed 1-5 Founders hire directly 1-2/quarter
Seed 5-15 First structured interviews, no HR person yet 2-4/quarter
Series A 15-40 First People hire, comp bands, career ladder v1 4-8/quarter
Series B 40-100 CHRO or VP People, full hiring process, HRIS 8-20/quarter
Series C 100-250 People team (3-5), manager training, performance system 15-40/quarter
Growth 250+ Full people function, analytics, L&D, total rewards 30+/quarter

2. Compensation Design

Compensation Band Architecture

Level Framework:
  IC Track                    Management Track
  ---------                   ----------------
  L1: Junior/Associate        --
  L2: Mid-level               --
  L3: Senior                  M1: Manager (first-time)
  L4: Staff/Principal         M2: Senior Manager
  L5: Distinguished/Fellow    M3: Director
  --                          M4: VP
  --                          M5: SVP/C-level

Band Construction Method

Step Action Data Source
1 Define levels with clear competency criteria Internal role descriptions
2 Benchmark each level against market Levels.fyi, Pave, Radford, Option Impact
3 Set band width (typically 20-30% spread) Market data + internal equity
4 Position band midpoint at target percentile P50 for cash, P50-P75 for total comp
5 Define equity bands per level Stage-appropriate equity calculator
6 Set promotion criteria between levels Performance + scope + impact

Total Compensation Components

Component Purpose Refresh Cadence
Base salary Market-rate cash compensation Annual review
Annual bonus Performance-linked variable pay Annual (if applicable)
Equity (options/RSUs) Long-term alignment and retention Initial grant + annual refresh
Benefits Health, 401k, perks Annual review
Signing bonus Competitive offer sweetener One-time

Equity Grant Guidelines by Stage

Stage IC Hire (L2-L3) Senior Hire (L4-L5) VP/C-Level
Seed 0.25-1.0% 1.0-2.5% 2.0-5.0%
Series A 0.05-0.25% 0.25-0.75% 0.5-2.0%
Series B 0.01-0.10% 0.10-0.30% 0.25-1.0%
Series C+ 0.005-0.05% 0.05-0.15% 0.10-0.50%

3. Organizational Design

Spans of Control Guidelines

Role Type Optimal Span Warning Signs
IC Manager (engineering) 5-8 direct reports > 10: no coaching time. < 4: unnecessary layer
IC Manager (non-eng) 6-10 direct reports > 12: overwhelmed. < 5: manager inflation
Manager of Managers 4-7 direct reports > 8: can't support managers. < 3: too many layers
VP/Director 5-8 direct reports > 10: strategic thinking suffers

When to Add Management Layers

TRIGGER: Team growing past threshold
  |
  v
[Current span of control > optimal?]
  |
  +-- NO  --> Don't add layer. Resist the urge.
  +-- YES --> [Is there a strong internal candidate?]
              |
              +-- YES --> Promote from within (faster, culture-preserving)
              +-- NO  --> [Is external hire justified?]
                          |
                          +-- YES --> Hire manager with 90-day expectations
                          +-- NO  --> Split team instead of adding layer

Org Design Anti-Patterns

Anti-Pattern Symptom Fix
Title inflation Everyone is a "Head of" at 20 people Standardized level framework
Shadow org Real decisions made outside official structure Align authority with accountability
Matrix chaos Every person has 3 reporting lines One clear manager, dotted lines documented
Founder bottleneck All decisions flow through founder Delegation framework (see founder-coach)
Empire building Managers hire to grow team, not to deliver Tie headcount to business outcomes

4. Performance Management

Calibrated Performance Framework

Rating Label Distribution Target Action
5 Exceptional 5-10% Accelerated promotion, significant equity refresh, retention bonus
4 Exceeds Expectations 20-25% Above-market raise, stretch assignment, mentor role
3 Meets Expectations 50-60% Market adjustment, development plan, new challenges
2 Needs Improvement 10-15% PIP with 60-day milestones, weekly manager check-ins
1 Underperforming 2-5% Exit conversation or immediate role change

Performance Review Cadence

Activity Frequency Owner Participants
1:1 meetings Weekly Manager Manager + direct report
Goal check-in Monthly Manager Manager + direct report
Peer feedback collection Quarterly People team Cross-functional peers
Performance review Semi-annual Manager + People Manager, report, skip-level
Calibration session Semi-annual People team All managers at same level
Promotion committee Semi-annual People + Leadership Committee of L4+ leaders

PIP (Performance Improvement Plan) Structure

Element Requirement
Specific gaps Observable behaviors, not vague criticism
Measurable goals 3-5 targets with success criteria
Timeline 30-60 days maximum
Support offered Training, mentoring, resources
Check-in cadence Weekly minimum
Clear outcome What happens if goals are met vs. not met
Documentation Written, signed, filed

5. Retention Strategy

Retention Risk Assessment Matrix

Factor Low Risk (1) Medium Risk (2) High Risk (3)
Comp competitiveness Above P50 At P50 Below P50
Manager relationship Strong trust Adequate Friction or distrust
Career growth Clear path, progressing Path exists, slow progress No visible path
Engagement High eNPS, advocates Neutral Disengaged, passive
Tenure < 1 year or > 3 years 1-2 years 18-24 months (cliff danger)
External demand Low market demand Moderate Hot market, recruiters active

Total score 6-8: Low risk. Monitor quarterly. Total score 9-13: Medium risk. Proactive retention conversation needed. Total score 14-18: High risk. Immediate intervention required.

Retention Intervention Ladder

Risk Level: LOW (6-8)
  --> Standard: competitive comp, regular 1:1s, career conversations

Risk Level: MEDIUM (9-13)
  --> Proactive: skip-level conversation, comp review, stretch project
  --> Timeline: act within 30 days of identification

Risk Level: HIGH (14-18)
  --> Urgent: retention package (comp + equity + role change), CEO involvement
  --> Timeline: act within 7 days of identification
  --> If departure: structured exit interview, knowledge transfer plan

People Metrics Dashboard

Tier 1: Board-Level Metrics (Monthly)

Metric Target Red Flag Data Source
Regrettable attrition (annualized) < 10% > 15% HRIS
eNPS score > 30 < 0 Quarterly survey
Time to fill (critical roles) < 45 days > 90 days ATS
Offer acceptance rate > 85% < 70% ATS
Revenue per employee Growing QoQ Declining Finance + HRIS

Tier 2: Leadership Metrics (Weekly)

Metric Target Action Trigger
Open requisitions Per plan > 120% of plan = capacity strain
90-day voluntary turnover < 5% > 8% = onboarding/hiring problem
Manager effectiveness score > 3.8/5 < 3.5 = management development needed
% employees within comp band > 90% < 80% = band recalibration needed
Internal promotion rate > 25% < 15% = career development gap

Tier 3: Operational Metrics (Daily/Weekly)

Metric Purpose
Pipeline by role (candidates per stage) Hiring velocity tracking
Interviewer load (interviews per person per week) Prevent interviewer burnout
Offer-to-close time Process efficiency
Compa-ratio distribution Compensation equity
Training completion rate Compliance and development

Red Flags

  • Attrition spikes with exit interviews naming the same manager -- manager problem, not culture problem
  • Comp bands not refreshed in 18+ months -- losing candidates and retaining the wrong people
  • No career ladder exists -- top performers leave at 18-24 months
  • Hiring without written job scorecard -- inconsistent decisions, bias risk
  • Performance reviews happen once a year only -- problems fester
  • Equity refreshes limited to executives -- key ICs become flight risks
  • Time to fill > 90 days for critical roles -- process is broken or comp is wrong
  • eNPS below 0 -- structural problem, not a morale issue
  • More than 3 org layers between IC and CEO at < 50 people -- over-managed
  • HR team ratio > 1:100 (too lean) or < 1:40 (too heavy) -- right-size the function
  • No structured onboarding beyond day 1 -- 90-day attrition will spike

Integration with C-Suite

When... CHRO Works With... To...
Headcount planning CFO (cfo-advisor) Model fully-loaded cost, secure budget
Hiring timing COO (coo-advisor) Align with operational capacity and project timelines
Engineering hiring CTO (cto-advisor) Define technical scorecards, level expectations
Revenue team scaling CRO (cro-advisor) Quota coverage modeling, ramp time projections
Board reporting CEO (ceo-advisor) People KPIs, attrition risk narrative, culture health
Equity grants CFO + Board Dilution modeling, option pool refresh
Culture programs Culture Architect (culture-architect) Behavioral anchors, engagement programs
Org restructuring CEO + COO Change management, communication plan
Founder development Founder Coach (founder-coach) Leadership style evolution, delegation

Proactive Triggers

Surface these without being asked when detected:

  • Key person approaching equity cliff with no refresh plan -- retention risk, act immediately
  • Hiring plan exists but no comp bands defined -- will overpay or lose candidates
  • Team growing past 25-30 with no manager layer -- org strain imminent
  • No performance review cycle -- underperformers hide, top performers leave
  • Regrettable attrition > 10% -- mandatory exit interview analysis
  • Manager-to-IC ratio outside 1:5-1:10 range -- org structure review needed
  • No succession plan for any leadership role -- single-point-of-failure risk
  • Offer acceptance rate drops below 75% -- comp or process problem

Output Artifacts

Request Deliverable
"Build a hiring plan" Headcount plan: roles, timing, cost, ramp model, business case per role
"Set up comp bands" Compensation framework: levels, bands, equity, benchmarks, refresh policy
"Design our org" Org chart proposal: spans, layers, transition plan, timeline
"We're losing people" Retention analysis: risk scores, root causes, intervention plan per person
"People board section" Board slide: headcount, attrition, hiring velocity, engagement, top risks
"Performance review setup" Performance framework: ratings, calibration, review cadence, templates
"Remote work policy" Policy document: expectations, tools, communication norms, exceptions
Weekly Installs
7
GitHub Stars
38
First Seen
6 days ago
Installed on
opencode7
gemini-cli7
github-copilot7
amp7
cline7
codex7