cs-onboard
C-Suite Onboarding
Tier: POWERFUL Category: C-Level Advisory Tags: onboarding, company context, founder interview, advisor setup, context capture, executive onboarding
Overview
C-Suite Onboarding captures the company context that powers every C-level advisory skill. One structured conversation produces a persistent context file that transforms generic advice into specific, situationally-aware guidance. Without context, advisory skills give textbook answers. With context, they give your-company answers.
Commands
| Command | Duration | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
/cs:setup |
45 minutes | Full onboarding interview across 7 dimensions |
/cs:update |
15 minutes | Quarterly refresh -- what changed since last capture |
/cs:score |
5 minutes | Assess context completeness and freshness |
Interview Principles
This is a conversation, not a form. Follow these rules:
- One question at a time. Never list multiple questions.
- Follow threads. When something interesting surfaces, go deeper before moving on.
- Reflect back. "So the real issue sounds like X -- is that right?"
- Watch for what they skip. Avoidance signals the most important areas.
- Never read from a list. Use the framework as a map, not a script.
- Earn the hard questions. Start easy, build trust, then ask about weaknesses and fears.
Opening line:
"Tell me about the company in your own words -- what are you building and why does it matter?"
Then let the conversation flow naturally across the 7 dimensions.
The 7 Interview Dimensions
Dimension 1: Company Identity
What to capture: What they do, who it is for, the real founding "why," one-sentence pitch, non-negotiable values.
Key probes:
- "If you had to explain this to your grandmother in one sentence, what would you say?"
- "What is a value you would fire someone over violating?"
- "What do you refuse to compromise on, even if it costs you?"
Red flags:
- Values that sound like marketing copy ("we empower synergies")
- Cannot articulate the founding "why" beyond "I saw a market opportunity"
- Mission statement that could apply to any company in the industry
Dimension 2: Stage & Scale
What to capture: Headcount (FT vs contractors), revenue range, runway, stage label, what broke in the last 90 days.
Key probes:
- "If you had to label your stage -- still finding PMF, scaling what works, or optimizing -- which is it?"
- "What broke in the last 90 days that you did not expect?"
- "What is the one metric you check every morning?"
Stage Definitions:
| Stage | Signal | Typical Challenges |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-PMF | <$500K ARR, pivoting, searching | Finding the right customer/problem/solution fit |
| Early PMF | $500K-$2M ARR, repeatable sales | Hiring, process, not breaking what works |
| Scaling | $2M-$10M ARR, growth machine building | Middle management, culture preservation, unit economics |
| Optimizing | $10M+ ARR, efficiency focus | Innovation stagnation, org complexity, market defense |
Dimension 3: Founder Profile
What to capture: Self-identified superpower, acknowledged blind spots, archetype, what actually keeps them up at night.
Key probes:
- "What would your co-founder (or closest advisor) say you should stop doing?"
- "When things go wrong, what is your instinctive first reaction?"
- "What part of running this company do you secretly dislike?"
Founder Archetypes:
| Archetype | Strength | Blind Spot | Advisory Focus |
|---|---|---|---|
| Product | Deep user empathy, product vision | Sales, go-to-market, delegation | Revenue strategy, hiring |
| Technical | Engineering excellence, technical moats | Business model, communication | GTM, storytelling, team |
| Sales | Revenue generation, relationships | Product depth, technical debt | Product strategy, engineering |
| Operator | Execution, processes, efficiency | Vision, innovation, risk-taking | Strategy, long-term planning |
Red flags:
- No acknowledged blind spots
- Weakness framed as strength ("I'm too much of a perfectionist")
- Co-founder dynamics described as "fine" with no specifics
Dimension 4: Team & Culture
What to capture: Team described in 3 words, last real conflict and how it was resolved, which values are real vs aspirational, strongest and weakest leader.
Key probes:
- "Which of your stated values is most real? Which is a poster on the wall?"
- "Tell me about the last real disagreement in the leadership team."
- "Who is the one person you cannot afford to lose, and why?"
Red flags:
- "We have no conflict" -- every healthy team has conflict
- Cannot name a weak leader -- either lying or not paying attention
- Culture described only in positive terms with no self-awareness
Dimension 5: Market & Competition
What to capture: Who is winning and why (honest version), real unfair advantage, the competitive move that could hurt them.
Key probes:
- "What is your real unfair advantage -- not the investor pitch version?"
- "If your best competitor had unlimited funding, what would they do that scares you?"
- "What do your competitors do better than you? Be honest."
Red flags:
- "We have no real competition" -- you always have competition, even if it is the status quo
- Unfair advantage is a feature that can be copied in 6 months
- No awareness of competitor strategy
Dimension 6: Current Challenges
What to capture: Priority stack-rank across product/growth/people/money/operations, the decision they have been avoiding, the "one extra day" answer.
Key probes:
- "If you had one extra day per week, what would you spend it on?" (Reveals true priority)
- "What is the decision you have been putting off for weeks?"
- "Rank these: product, growth, people, money, operations. What is number 1 right now?"
The "avoided decision" is often the most valuable insight. Common avoided decisions:
- Firing an underperformer who is well-liked
- Pivoting away from a product that is not working
- Having an honest conversation with a co-founder
- Raising prices
- Cutting a feature or initiative
Dimension 7: Goals & Ambition
What to capture: 12-month target (specific and measurable), 36-month target (directional), exit vs build-forever orientation, personal success definition.
Key probes:
- "What does 12 months from now look like if everything goes right?"
- "What does success look like for you personally -- separate from the company?"
- "Are you building to sell, building forever, or haven't decided?"
Red flags:
- 12-month target that is vague ("grow a lot")
- Personal and company goals completely disconnected
- Exit orientation that conflicts with stated mission
Context Output Structure
After the interview, generate the context file at ~/.claude/company-context.md:
# Company Context
**Last updated:** [Date]
**Freshness:** Fresh (< 90 days)
**Completeness:** [X/7 dimensions captured]
**Interviewed:** [Founder name and role]
## 1. Company Identity
**What we do:** [One sentence]
**Who it's for:** [Target customer]
**Why it matters:** [Founding motivation -- the real version]
**One-line pitch:** [Elevator pitch]
**Non-negotiable values:** [Values they would fire over]
## 2. Stage & Scale
**Stage:** [Pre-PMF / Early PMF / Scaling / Optimizing]
**Headcount:** [X FT + Y contractors]
**Revenue:** [$X ARR / MRR]
**Runway:** [X months at current burn]
**Morning metric:** [What they check first]
**Recent break:** [What broke in last 90 days]
## 3. Founder Profile
**Archetype:** [Product / Technical / Sales / Operator]
**Superpower:** [Self-identified strength]
**Blind spot:** [Acknowledged weakness]
**Up-at-night:** [Current anxiety]
**Co-founder dynamic:** [Healthy / Strained / Solo]
## 4. Team & Culture
**Team in 3 words:** [Their words]
**Real values:** [Values that are actually lived]
**Aspirational values:** [Values that are work-in-progress]
**Key person risk:** [Who they cannot lose]
**Weakest link:** [Leadership gap]
**Last conflict:** [What happened and how resolved]
## 5. Market & Competition
**Winning competitor:** [Who and why]
**Real unfair advantage:** [Not the investor version]
**Kill-shot risk:** [Competitive move that could hurt them]
**Market position:** [Leader / Challenger / Niche / Emerging]
## 6. Current Challenges
**Priority #1:** [Top challenge area]
**Priority stack:** [Rank of product/growth/people/money/ops]
**Avoided decision:** [What they have been putting off]
**One-extra-day:** [What they would spend time on]
## 7. Goals & Ambition
**12-month target:** [Specific, measurable]
**36-month target:** [Directional]
**Orientation:** [Build to sell / Build forever / Undecided]
**Personal success:** [What success means for the founder personally]
## Notes
[Observations, inferred patterns, things to watch]
[CONTEXT UPDATE entries from subsequent sessions]
Rules:
- Write
[not captured]for unknowns -- never leave blank - Use their actual words when possible, not corporate paraphrasing
- Note confidence level for inferred information
- Never silently modify -- always confirm before updating
Context Quality Scoring
Completeness Score
| Dimensions Captured | Score | Label |
|---|---|---|
| 7/7 | 100% | Complete |
| 5-6/7 | 70-85% | Good (identify gaps) |
| 3-4/7 | 40-55% | Partial (schedule follow-up) |
| 1-2/7 | 15-25% | Minimal (re-interview needed) |
Freshness Score
| Age | Score | Label | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| < 30 days | Fresh | High confidence | Use directly |
| 30-90 days | Aging | Medium confidence | Use, flag what may have changed |
| 90-180 days | Stale | Low confidence | Prompt for /cs:update |
| > 180 days | Expired | Very low confidence | Re-interview recommended |
Quality Signals
| Signal | Confidence Impact |
|---|---|
| Full interview completed | +High |
| Update done within 90 days | +Medium |
| Key fields populated with specifics | +High |
| Fields contain vague/generic answers | -Medium |
| Financial fields missing | -High (for CFO/CEO skills) |
| "Not captured" in 3+ fields | -High |
Quarterly Refresh Protocol (/cs:update)
Trigger: Every 90 days or after a major event (fundraise, reorg, pivot, key hire/departure).
Opening: "It has been [X time] since we captured your company context. Let's do a quick refresh. What has changed?"
Walk each dimension with a single "what changed?" question:
| Dimension | Refresh Question |
|---|---|
| Identity | "Still the same mission, or has it shifted?" |
| Stage & Scale | "Team size, revenue, and runway now?" |
| Founder | "Has your role changed? What is stretching you?" |
| Team | "Any leadership changes? New key players?" |
| Market | "Any competitive surprises? Market shifts?" |
| Challenges | "What is the #1 problem now vs 90 days ago?" |
| Goals | "Still on track for the 12-month target?" |
After refresh:
- Update relevant sections in context file
- Update
Last updatedtimestamp - Reset freshness to
Fresh - Note what changed in the Notes section
Context Enrichment During Sessions
During advisory conversations, new information surfaces. Capture it without disrupting flow.
Triggers for enrichment:
- New metric or number shared
- Key person mentioned for the first time
- Priority shift expressed
- New constraint or risk surfaces
- Timeline or deadline revealed
Protocol:
- Note internally during conversation
- At session end: "I picked up a few things that would be useful to add to your context. Want me to update the file?"
- If yes: append to relevant section, update timestamp
- If no: respect the decision
Never silently modify the context file. Always confirm before changes.
Privacy Rules
Never Send Externally
- Specific revenue or burn rate figures
- Customer names (unless publicly known)
- Employee names (unless publicly known)
- Investor names (unless publicly announced)
- Specific runway months
- Watch list contents
- Avoided decisions
Safe to Use Externally (Anonymized)
- Stage label (seed, Series A, etc.)
- Team size ranges (1-10, 10-50, 50-200+)
- Industry vertical
- Challenge category (not specifics)
- Market position descriptor
Before Any External API Call
- Numbers become ranges or stage-relative descriptors
- Names become roles ("the CTO" not "Sarah")
- Revenue becomes stage labels ("early revenue" not "$800K ARR")
- Customers become "Customer A, B, C"
Missing Context Handling
Handle gracefully -- never block the conversation.
| Missing | Approach |
|---|---|
| Stage | "Just to calibrate -- are you still finding PMF or scaling what works?" |
| Financials | Use stage + team size to infer. Note the inference. |
| Founder profile | Infer from conversation style. Mark as inferred. |
| Multiple founders | Context reflects interviewee. Note co-founder perspective may differ. |
| Recent context | "It's been a while since your last update. Should I assume things are roughly the same, or has something big changed?" |
Integration with C-Suite Skills
The context file is loaded by every C-level advisory skill:
| Skill | Uses Context For |
|---|---|
| ceo-advisor | Strategic recommendations calibrated to stage and challenges |
| cfo-advisor | Financial guidance calibrated to runway and revenue |
| cto-advisor | Technical strategy calibrated to team and architecture |
| coo-advisor | Operations advice calibrated to scale and processes |
| cmo-advisor | Marketing strategy calibrated to stage and market position |
| internal-narrative | Narrative construction based on company truth |
| scenario-war-room | Risk variables calibrated to actual threats |
Related Skills
| Skill | Use When |
|---|---|
| ceo-advisor | Using context for strategic decisions |
| internal-narrative | Building narratives from the captured context |
| scenario-war-room | Modeling risks based on company context |
| context-engine | Technical implementation of context management for AI agents |