skills/borghei/claude-skills/operations-manager

operations-manager

SKILL.md

Operations Manager

The agent operates as a senior operations manager, applying Lean Six Sigma, PDCA, and capacity-planning frameworks to drive measurable efficiency gains.

Workflow

  1. Assess maturity -- Classify the operation against the five-level maturity model (Reactive through Optimized). Record the current level and the evidence that supports the classification.
  2. Map the process -- Document the target process using the process documentation template. Identify every decision point, handoff, and system dependency.
  3. Measure baseline -- Capture KPIs: throughput, cycle time, first-pass yield, cost per unit, and utilization. Validate each metric has a reliable data source before proceeding.
  4. Analyze gaps -- Run root-cause analysis (5 Whys or fishbone). Quantify the gap between baseline and target for each KPI.
  5. Design improvement -- Propose changes using DMAIC or PDCA. Include a pilot scope, rollback criteria, and expected ROI.
  6. Implement and control -- Execute the pilot, collect post-change metrics, and compare to baseline. If improvement meets threshold, standardize; otherwise iterate from step 4.

Checkpoint: After step 3, confirm that every KPI has an owner and a data source before moving to analysis.

Operations Maturity Model

Level Name Characteristics
1 Reactive Ad-hoc processes, hero-dependent, crisis management, limited visibility
2 Managed Documented processes, basic metrics, standard procedures, some automation
3 Defined Consistent processes, performance tracking, cross-functional coordination, continuous improvement
4 Measured Data-driven decisions, predictive analytics, optimized workflows, proactive management
5 Optimized Self-optimizing systems, innovation culture, industry-leading efficiency, strategic advantage

KPI Framework

Category Metric Formula Target
Efficiency Utilization Active time / Available time 85%+
Productivity Output per FTE Units / FTE hours Varies
Quality First-pass yield Good units / Total 95%+
Speed Cycle time End time - Start time Varies
Cost Cost per unit Total cost / Units Varies
Customer CSAT Satisfied / Total responses 90%+

Process Documentation Template

# Process: [Name]

- **Owner:** [Role]
- **Frequency:** [Daily / Weekly / On-demand]
- **Trigger:** [What starts this process]
- **Output:** [Deliverable or state change]

## Steps

| # | Action | Owner | Input | Output | SLA |
|---|--------|-------|-------|--------|-----|
| 1 | Receive request | Ops team | Ticket | Validated ticket | 1 hr |
| 2 | Validate request | Analyst | Validated ticket | Approved / Rejected | 2 hr |
| 3 | Execute action | Specialist | Approved ticket | Completed work | 4 hr |
| 4 | Notify requester | System | Completion record | Notification sent | 15 min |

## Decision Points

| Decision | Criteria | Yes Path | No Path |
|----------|----------|----------|---------|
| Valid request? | Meets intake checklist | Step 2 | Reject and notify |
| Approval required? | Value > $5K | Escalate to manager | Step 3 |

## Metrics

| Metric | Target | Current |
|--------|--------|---------|
| Cycle time | < 8 hours | |
| Error rate | < 2% | |
| Volume | 50/day | |

Example: DMAIC Cycle Time Reduction

A fulfillment team running 6.5-hour average cycle time against a 5-hour target:

DEFINE
  Problem: Cycle time 30% above target (6.5 hr vs 5.0 hr)
  Scope: Order-to-ship for domestic orders
  Metric: Average cycle time, measured from ERP timestamps

MEASURE
  Baseline data (30 days, n=1200 orders):
    Mean: 6.5 hr | Median: 6.1 hr | P95: 9.8 hr
    Bottleneck: Pick-and-pack stage accounts for 55% of total time

ANALYZE
  5 Whys on pick-and-pack delay:
    1. Why slow? -> Pickers walk long distances
    2. Why long walks? -> Items stored alphabetically, not by frequency
    3. Why alphabetical? -> Legacy warehouse layout from 2019
  Root cause: Storage layout does not reflect current SKU velocity

IMPROVE
  Action: Re-slot top 20% SKUs (by volume) to Zone A near packing stations
  Pilot: 2-week trial on Aisle 1-3
  Expected result: 25% reduction in pick time

CONTROL
  Post-pilot (14 days, n=580 orders):
    Mean: 4.8 hr | Median: 4.5 hr | P95: 7.2 hr
  Result: 26% reduction -- standardize across all aisles
  Control: Weekly cycle-time dashboard with alert at > 5.5 hr

Capacity Planning

Capacity Required = Forecast Volume x Time per Unit
Capacity Available = FTE x Hours per Day x Productivity Factor

Gap = Required - Available

Planning Horizons:
  Daily    -> Staff scheduling, shift adjustments
  Weekly   -> Workload balancing across teams
  Monthly  -> Temp staffing, overtime authorization
  Quarterly -> Hiring plans, cross-training programs
  Annual   -> Strategic workforce and capex planning

Vendor Scorecard

Dimension Weight Metrics
Quality 30% Defect rate (< 1%), first-pass acceptance (> 95%)
Delivery 25% On-time delivery (> 98%), lead time (< 5 days)
Cost 20% Price vs market (within 5%), invoice accuracy (> 99%)
Service 15% Response time (< 24 hr), issue resolution (< 48 hr)
Relationship 10% Communication quality, flexibility

Score each metric 1-5. Weighted total determines vendor tier: 4.5+ = Strategic Partner, 3.5-4.4 = Preferred, below 3.5 = Under Review.

Cost Breakdown Structure

DIRECT COSTS
  Labor: Wages + Benefits + Overtime
  Materials: Raw materials + Supplies
  Equipment: Depreciation + Maintenance

INDIRECT COSTS
  Overhead: Facilities + Utilities + Insurance
  Administrative: Management + Support staff

Cost per Unit = (Direct + Indirect) / Units Produced

Continuous Improvement: PDCA

  1. Plan -- Identify the opportunity, analyze the current state, set an improvement target, develop the action plan.
  2. Do -- Implement on a small scale, document observations, collect data.
  3. Check -- Compare results to the target. If gap remains, perform root-cause analysis.
  4. Act -- If successful, standardize and scale. If not, return to Plan with new hypotheses.

Reference Materials

  • references/process_design.md - Process design principles
  • references/lean_operations.md - Lean methodology
  • references/vendor_management.md - Vendor management guide
  • references/cost_optimization.md - Cost reduction strategies

Scripts

# Process analyzer
python scripts/process_analyzer.py --process order_fulfillment

# Capacity planner
python scripts/capacity_planner.py --forecast demand.csv --staff team.csv

# Cost calculator
python scripts/cost_calculator.py --data operations.csv

# Vendor scorecard generator
python scripts/vendor_scorecard.py --vendor "Vendor Name"
Weekly Installs
119
GitHub Stars
38
First Seen
Jan 24, 2026
Installed on
opencode96
gemini-cli92
codex88
cursor87
github-copilot85
claude-code82