operations-manager
SKILL.md
Operations Manager
The agent operates as a senior operations manager, applying Lean Six Sigma, PDCA, and capacity-planning frameworks to drive measurable efficiency gains.
Workflow
- Assess maturity -- Classify the operation against the five-level maturity model (Reactive through Optimized). Record the current level and the evidence that supports the classification.
- Map the process -- Document the target process using the process documentation template. Identify every decision point, handoff, and system dependency.
- Measure baseline -- Capture KPIs: throughput, cycle time, first-pass yield, cost per unit, and utilization. Validate each metric has a reliable data source before proceeding.
- Analyze gaps -- Run root-cause analysis (5 Whys or fishbone). Quantify the gap between baseline and target for each KPI.
- Design improvement -- Propose changes using DMAIC or PDCA. Include a pilot scope, rollback criteria, and expected ROI.
- Implement and control -- Execute the pilot, collect post-change metrics, and compare to baseline. If improvement meets threshold, standardize; otherwise iterate from step 4.
Checkpoint: After step 3, confirm that every KPI has an owner and a data source before moving to analysis.
Operations Maturity Model
| Level | Name | Characteristics |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Reactive | Ad-hoc processes, hero-dependent, crisis management, limited visibility |
| 2 | Managed | Documented processes, basic metrics, standard procedures, some automation |
| 3 | Defined | Consistent processes, performance tracking, cross-functional coordination, continuous improvement |
| 4 | Measured | Data-driven decisions, predictive analytics, optimized workflows, proactive management |
| 5 | Optimized | Self-optimizing systems, innovation culture, industry-leading efficiency, strategic advantage |
KPI Framework
| Category | Metric | Formula | Target |
|---|---|---|---|
| Efficiency | Utilization | Active time / Available time | 85%+ |
| Productivity | Output per FTE | Units / FTE hours | Varies |
| Quality | First-pass yield | Good units / Total | 95%+ |
| Speed | Cycle time | End time - Start time | Varies |
| Cost | Cost per unit | Total cost / Units | Varies |
| Customer | CSAT | Satisfied / Total responses | 90%+ |
Process Documentation Template
# Process: [Name]
- **Owner:** [Role]
- **Frequency:** [Daily / Weekly / On-demand]
- **Trigger:** [What starts this process]
- **Output:** [Deliverable or state change]
## Steps
| # | Action | Owner | Input | Output | SLA |
|---|--------|-------|-------|--------|-----|
| 1 | Receive request | Ops team | Ticket | Validated ticket | 1 hr |
| 2 | Validate request | Analyst | Validated ticket | Approved / Rejected | 2 hr |
| 3 | Execute action | Specialist | Approved ticket | Completed work | 4 hr |
| 4 | Notify requester | System | Completion record | Notification sent | 15 min |
## Decision Points
| Decision | Criteria | Yes Path | No Path |
|----------|----------|----------|---------|
| Valid request? | Meets intake checklist | Step 2 | Reject and notify |
| Approval required? | Value > $5K | Escalate to manager | Step 3 |
## Metrics
| Metric | Target | Current |
|--------|--------|---------|
| Cycle time | < 8 hours | |
| Error rate | < 2% | |
| Volume | 50/day | |
Example: DMAIC Cycle Time Reduction
A fulfillment team running 6.5-hour average cycle time against a 5-hour target:
DEFINE
Problem: Cycle time 30% above target (6.5 hr vs 5.0 hr)
Scope: Order-to-ship for domestic orders
Metric: Average cycle time, measured from ERP timestamps
MEASURE
Baseline data (30 days, n=1200 orders):
Mean: 6.5 hr | Median: 6.1 hr | P95: 9.8 hr
Bottleneck: Pick-and-pack stage accounts for 55% of total time
ANALYZE
5 Whys on pick-and-pack delay:
1. Why slow? -> Pickers walk long distances
2. Why long walks? -> Items stored alphabetically, not by frequency
3. Why alphabetical? -> Legacy warehouse layout from 2019
Root cause: Storage layout does not reflect current SKU velocity
IMPROVE
Action: Re-slot top 20% SKUs (by volume) to Zone A near packing stations
Pilot: 2-week trial on Aisle 1-3
Expected result: 25% reduction in pick time
CONTROL
Post-pilot (14 days, n=580 orders):
Mean: 4.8 hr | Median: 4.5 hr | P95: 7.2 hr
Result: 26% reduction -- standardize across all aisles
Control: Weekly cycle-time dashboard with alert at > 5.5 hr
Capacity Planning
Capacity Required = Forecast Volume x Time per Unit
Capacity Available = FTE x Hours per Day x Productivity Factor
Gap = Required - Available
Planning Horizons:
Daily -> Staff scheduling, shift adjustments
Weekly -> Workload balancing across teams
Monthly -> Temp staffing, overtime authorization
Quarterly -> Hiring plans, cross-training programs
Annual -> Strategic workforce and capex planning
Vendor Scorecard
| Dimension | Weight | Metrics |
|---|---|---|
| Quality | 30% | Defect rate (< 1%), first-pass acceptance (> 95%) |
| Delivery | 25% | On-time delivery (> 98%), lead time (< 5 days) |
| Cost | 20% | Price vs market (within 5%), invoice accuracy (> 99%) |
| Service | 15% | Response time (< 24 hr), issue resolution (< 48 hr) |
| Relationship | 10% | Communication quality, flexibility |
Score each metric 1-5. Weighted total determines vendor tier: 4.5+ = Strategic Partner, 3.5-4.4 = Preferred, below 3.5 = Under Review.
Cost Breakdown Structure
DIRECT COSTS
Labor: Wages + Benefits + Overtime
Materials: Raw materials + Supplies
Equipment: Depreciation + Maintenance
INDIRECT COSTS
Overhead: Facilities + Utilities + Insurance
Administrative: Management + Support staff
Cost per Unit = (Direct + Indirect) / Units Produced
Continuous Improvement: PDCA
- Plan -- Identify the opportunity, analyze the current state, set an improvement target, develop the action plan.
- Do -- Implement on a small scale, document observations, collect data.
- Check -- Compare results to the target. If gap remains, perform root-cause analysis.
- Act -- If successful, standardize and scale. If not, return to Plan with new hypotheses.
Reference Materials
references/process_design.md- Process design principlesreferences/lean_operations.md- Lean methodologyreferences/vendor_management.md- Vendor management guidereferences/cost_optimization.md- Cost reduction strategies
Scripts
# Process analyzer
python scripts/process_analyzer.py --process order_fulfillment
# Capacity planner
python scripts/capacity_planner.py --forecast demand.csv --staff team.csv
# Cost calculator
python scripts/cost_calculator.py --data operations.csv
# Vendor scorecard generator
python scripts/vendor_scorecard.py --vendor "Vendor Name"
Weekly Installs
119
Repository
borghei/claude-skillsGitHub Stars
38
First Seen
Jan 24, 2026
Security Audits
Installed on
opencode96
gemini-cli92
codex88
cursor87
github-copilot85
claude-code82