monthly-review
Monthly Review
Conduct a monthly review of project alignment and progress toward aims.
When to Use
- First week of each month (RA will prompt)
- After completing a major milestone
- When feeling uncertain about direction
- Before reporting to PI/collaborators
Execution Steps
1. Gather Context
Read these files:
.research/project_telos.md- Aims and goals.research/phase_checklist.md- Phase progress.research/logs/weekly/*.md- All weekly reviews this month.research/logs/monthly/- Previous monthly reviewsmanuscript/- Manuscript progress- Git log for the month
2. Generate Monthly Review
# Monthly Review: [MONTH YEAR]
## Executive Summary
**Project**: [Project name from project_telos.md]
**Current Phase**: [PHASE]
**Overall Health**: 🟢 On Track / 🟡 Needs Attention / 🔴 At Risk
## Progress Against Aims
### Aim 1: [Title]
- **Status**: [Not started / In progress / Complete]
- **Progress this month**:
- [Specific accomplishment]
- [Specific accomplishment]
- **Blockers**: [None / List]
- **On track for completion?**: [Yes/No - by when]
### Aim 2: [Title]
- **Status**:
- **Progress this month**:
- **Blockers**:
- **On track?**:
### Aim 3: [Title]
[Continue pattern]
## Phase Progress
| Phase | Last Month | This Month | Change |
|-------|------------|------------|--------|
| SETUP | ✅ | ✅ | - |
| PLANNING | 80% | ✅ | Completed |
| DEVELOPMENT | 20% | 60% | +40% |
| ANALYSIS | 0% | 10% | Started |
| WRITING | 0% | 0% | - |
| REVIEW | 0% | 0% | - |
## Manuscript Status
| Section | Status | Last Updated |
|---------|--------|--------------|
| Background | [Draft/Revision/Complete] | [Date] |
| Methods | [Draft/Revision/Complete] | [Date] |
| Results | [Draft/Revision/Complete] | [Date] |
| Discussion | [Not started/Draft/Complete] | [Date] |
## Key Metrics
### Productivity Dashboard
| Metric | Target | Achieved | YTD Total |
|--------|--------|----------|----------|
| Weekly reviews completed | 4 | | |
| Active coding days | 15 | | |
| Commits | 20 | | |
| Scripts documented | | | |
| Figures generated | | | |
| Manuscript sections drafted | | | |
### Pipeline
- DVC stages defined: [N]
- Pipeline runs successfully: [Yes/No]
- Figures generated: [N]
### Off-Track Indicators
Check for these warning signs:
- [ ] Behind schedule by >2 weeks on milestones
- [ ] Same blocker appearing across multiple weeks
- [ ] Scope expanding without adjustment
- [ ] Key decisions being deferred
- [ ] Documentation falling behind
## Next Month Goals
### Must Complete
1. [Critical goal]
2. [Critical goal]
### Should Complete
1. [Important goal]
2. [Important goal]
### Stretch Goals
1. [Ambitious goal]
## Action Items
- [ ] [Specific action from this review]
- [ ] [Specific action]
---
*Review completed: [TIMESTAMP]*
*Next monthly review: [DATE]*
3. Save Review
Save to .research/logs/monthly/YYYY-MM.md
4. Suggest Next Steps
Monthly review saved!
Based on your progress:
A) Adjust project timeline or scope
[If off-track indicators detected]
B) Update aims or methodology
[If direction has shifted]
C) Plan next month's priorities
Run /plan_week for immediate focus
D) Continue with current work
You're on track!
What would you like to focus on?
Related Skills
weekly-review- Tactical progressquarterly-review- Strategic alignmentnext- Get next suggestion
More from braselog/researchassistant
scientific-writing
Write scientific manuscripts with proper structure (IMRAD), citations (APA/AMA/Vancouver), figures/tables, and reporting guidelines (CONSORT/STROBE/PRISMA). Use when drafting any manuscript section, improving writing clarity, or preparing for journal submission.
15deep-research
Conduct a thorough literature search on a topic with verified citations. Use when the user types /deep_research, asks to "research a topic", "find papers on", or needs literature review. CRITICAL - Never fabricate citations. Every claim must have a verifiable source.
9statistical-analysis
Comprehensive statistical analysis toolkit for research. Conduct hypothesis tests (t-test, ANOVA, chi-square), regression, correlation, Bayesian stats, power analysis, assumption checks, and APA reporting. Use when the user asks about statistics, needs help analyzing data, or when writing methods sections that include statistical approaches.
5literature-review
Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple databases (PubMed, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex). Creates documented searches, synthesizes findings thematically, verifies citations, and generates professional markdown reports with multiple citation styles (APA, Nature, Vancouver). Use when the user needs thorough literature research or types /deep_research.
5next
Assess current project state and suggest the most valuable next action. The primary entry point for users who aren't sure what to do. Analyzes context, checks for issues, and recommends specific skills or actions.
4quarterly-review
Conduct a quarterly review of your overall research mission and direction. This is a user-level review stored in ~/.researchAssistant/. Use when the user types /quarterly_review, every 3 months, after major project milestones, or when questioning research direction.
4