lno-prioritize
LNO Prioritize
Most PMs waste time on overhead disguised as strategy.
This skill categorizes your backlog by actual impact:
- Leverage (L): 10x impact - the work that actually matters
- Neutral (N): Regular work - do it well enough, move on
- Overhead (O): Busywork - minimize or automate
Then tells you if your time allocation is broken.
Works with:
- Linear MCP - Auto-analyzes and labels your issues
- GitHub MCP - Auto-analyzes and labels your issues
- Manual - Paste your issue list
Entry Point
When this skill is invoked, start with:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
LNO PRIORITIZATION
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Are you spending 60%+ time on Leverage work?
Most PMs aren't.
What do you want to analyze?
1. Current sprint/cycle
→ I'll fetch and categorize all active issues
2. Specific team or project
→ Focus on a subset of your backlog
3. Paste issue list
→ I'll categorize what you provide
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
What This Does
Categorizes every issue, then challenges your priorities:
- Are you spending 60%+ time on Leverage work? (You should be)
- Is "strategy work" actually Overhead disguised as important?
- Which Neutral tasks can you delegate or do at B- quality?
- Which Overhead tasks can you eliminate entirely?
Usage
/lno-prioritize
Optional parameters:
/lno-prioritize --team [team-name]- Categorize specific team's issues/lno-prioritize --project [project-name]- Categorize specific project/lno-prioritize --label- Auto-add Linear labels (leverage/neutral/overhead)/lno-prioritize --current-sprint- Only analyze current sprint issues
What Happens
- Fetches issues from Linear or GitHub (if MCPs configured)
- Applies LNO framework
- Categorizes each issue based on:
- Strategic importance
- Impact potential
- Time investment required
- Compounding value
- Returns analysis with:
- Issue title and ID
- LNO category assignment
- Reasoning for categorization
- Recommended time allocation
- Optionally updates source with labels (if
--labelflag used and using Linear)
Example Output
📊 LNO Prioritization Results
🚀 LEVERAGE (10x impact - be a perfectionist):
- [ENG-245] Rebuild recommendation engine
Reason: Core product differentiator, compounds over time
- [ENG-198] Product strategy for Q2
Reason: Foundational decision affecting all downstream work
📈 NEUTRAL (Regular impact - do good enough work):
- [ENG-301] Update onboarding flow copy
Reason: Important but not transformational
- [ENG-276] Add analytics to checkout page
Reason: Useful data but incremental improvement
⚙️ OVERHEAD (Minimal impact - do quickly):
- [ENG-312] Reformat PRD template
Reason: Administrative work, no strategic value
- [ENG-288] Update Linear labels
Reason: Organizational cleanup
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
📊 YOUR TIME ALLOCATION IS BROKEN
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Current backlog:
- 2 Leverage tasks (20%)
- 4 Neutral tasks (40%)
- 4 Overhead tasks (40%)
TARGET allocation:
- 60% Leverage (you're at 20% - way too low)
- 30% Neutral
- 10% Overhead (you're at 40% - way too high)
WHAT TO DO:
1. **Kill or delegate 3 of 4 Overhead tasks**
- Reformatting templates? Not your job.
- Linear labels? Automate it.
2. **Stop perfectionism on Neutral work**
- Onboarding copy doesn't need to be perfect
- Ship at B- quality and move on
3. **Focus on Leverage:**
- Recommendation engine = your #1 priority
- Q2 strategy = your #2 priority
- Everything else can wait
Want me to create Linear issues to delegate/automate the Overhead work?
Integration Options
With Linear MCP: Automatically fetches Linear issues and can add L/N/O labels.
With GitHub MCP: Automatically fetches GitHub issues and can add labels.
Manual mode: Paste your issues and the skill will categorize them:
Apply the LNO framework to these issues: [paste issue list]
Learn More
See the full LNO Prioritization framework at:
frameworks/planning/lno-prioritization.md
Framework: Aakash Gupta (based on Shreyas Doshi) Best for: Sprint planning, backlog grooming, time management AI-era adaptation: Focus on leverage work (vision, strategy) while AI handles neutral/overhead tasks
More from breethomas/pm-thought-partner
agent-workflow
Expert system for designing and architecting AI agent workflows based on proven Meta methodologies. Use when users need to build AI agents, create agent workflows, solve problems using agentic systems, integrate multiple tools into agent architectures, or need guidance on agent design patterns. Helps translate business problems into structured agent solutions with clear scope, tool integration, and multi-layer architecture planning.
9context-engineering
[ARCHIVED] Full 4D Context Canvas reference. For new AI features, use /spec --ai. For debugging, use /ai-debug. For quality checks, use /context-check.
6spec
Write specifications at the right depth for any project. Progressive disclosure from quick Linear issues to full AI feature specs. Embeds Linear Method philosophy (brevity, clarity, momentum) with context engineering for AI features. Use for any spec work - quick tasks, features, or AI products.
2competitive-research
Systematic competitive intelligence with parallel agent analysis. Analyzes competitors thoroughly and synthesizes into actionable insights.
2pmf-survey
Create and analyze a PMF survey using Rahul Vohra's Superhuman framework. The magic 40% benchmark for product-market fit.
2four-fits
Find which fit is broken before you burn cash scaling. Brian Balfour's framework for validating sustainable growth readiness.
2