plan-gap-analysis
Plan Gap Analysis
Analyze gaps between documented plans in plans/ and actual implementation.
Workflow
Phase 1: Plan Inventory
Read all plan files:
00-overview.md- Project summary and metrics01-understand.md- Requirements and components02-plan.md- Architecture decisions and roadmap03-execute.md- Implementation details04-review.md- Quality requirements05-secure.md- Security requirements06-feedback-loop.md- Refinements
Phase 2: Codebase Inventory
# List all crates
find . -name "Cargo.toml" -not -path "*/target/*"
# List source files
find . -name "*.rs" -not -path "*/target/*"
Crates to analyze:
do-memory-core- Core data structures and orchestrationdo-memory-storage-turso- Turso/libSQL backenddo-memory-storage-redb- redb cache layerdo-memory-mcp- MCP server and sandboxdo-memory-test-utils- Test utilitiesbenches- Performance benchmarks
Phase 3: Gap Identification
Check each phase:
| Phase | Focus Areas |
|---|---|
| UNDERSTAND | Data structures, type definitions |
| PLAN | Architectural decisions, success metrics |
| EXECUTE | Storage, learning, MCP features |
| REVIEW | FR1-FR7, NFR1-NFR6 tests |
| SECURE | Attack surfaces, mitigations |
| FEEDBACK | Edge cases, optimizations |
Phase 4: Prioritization
Critical (Blocks production):
- Security vulnerabilities
- Data corruption risks
- Missing core functionality
High (Affects quality):
- Performance targets not met
- Test coverage below target
- Missing error handling
Medium (Technical debt):
- Code quality issues
- Documentation gaps
Phase 5: TODO Generation
## Phase [N]: [NAME]
### Critical Priority
- [ ] [Component] - [Missing item]
- File: path/to/file.rs
- Plan: plans/0X-phase.md:LineNumber
- Impact: [Description]
- Effort: [Estimate]
Output Format
# Plan Gap Analysis Report
**Total Requirements**: X
**Implemented**: Y (Z%)
**Gaps Identified**: N
## By Phase
- Phase 1: X/Y complete
- Phase 2: X/Y complete
- ...
## Critical Gaps
1. [Gap] - Priority, Effort
Best Practices
✓ Be systematic: Check every requirement ✓ Be specific: Reference exact file locations ✓ Be accurate: Verify, don't assume ✓ Be prioritized: Critical > High > Medium > Low ✓ Be actionable: Include file paths and estimates
More from d-o-hub/rust-self-learning-memory
loop-agent
Execute workflow agents iteratively for refinement and progressive improvement until quality criteria are met. Use when tasks require repetitive refinement, multi-iteration improvements, progressive optimization, or feedback loops until convergence.
51web-search-researcher
Research topics using web search and content fetching to find accurate, current information. Use when you need modern information, official documentation, best practices, technical solutions, or comparisons beyond your training data.
46perplexity-researcher-reasoning-pro
Highest level of research and reasoning capabilities for complex decision-making with significant consequences, strategic planning, technical architecture decisions, multi-stakeholder problems, or high-complexity troubleshooting requiring expert-level judgment and sophisticated reasoning chains. Prioritizes actively maintained repositories and validates website sources for 2025 relevance.
44context-retrieval
Retrieve relevant episodic context from memory for informed decision-making. Use when you need past episodes, patterns, or solutions to similar tasks.
44rust-code-quality
Perform comprehensive Rust code quality reviews against best practices for async Rust, error handling, testing, and project structure
43codebase-analyzer
Analyze implementation details, trace data flow, explain technical workings, locate files, and consolidate codebases. Use when you need to understand HOW code works, find file locations, or assess technical debt.
40