plan-gap-analysis

Installation
SKILL.md

Plan Gap Analysis

Analyze gaps between documented plans in plans/ and actual implementation.

Workflow

Phase 1: Plan Inventory

Read all plan files:

  • 00-overview.md - Project summary and metrics
  • 01-understand.md - Requirements and components
  • 02-plan.md - Architecture decisions and roadmap
  • 03-execute.md - Implementation details
  • 04-review.md - Quality requirements
  • 05-secure.md - Security requirements
  • 06-feedback-loop.md - Refinements

Phase 2: Codebase Inventory

# List all crates
find . -name "Cargo.toml" -not -path "*/target/*"

# List source files
find . -name "*.rs" -not -path "*/target/*"

Crates to analyze:

  • do-memory-core - Core data structures and orchestration
  • do-memory-storage-turso - Turso/libSQL backend
  • do-memory-storage-redb - redb cache layer
  • do-memory-mcp - MCP server and sandbox
  • do-memory-test-utils - Test utilities
  • benches - Performance benchmarks

Phase 3: Gap Identification

Check each phase:

Phase Focus Areas
UNDERSTAND Data structures, type definitions
PLAN Architectural decisions, success metrics
EXECUTE Storage, learning, MCP features
REVIEW FR1-FR7, NFR1-NFR6 tests
SECURE Attack surfaces, mitigations
FEEDBACK Edge cases, optimizations

Phase 4: Prioritization

Critical (Blocks production):

  • Security vulnerabilities
  • Data corruption risks
  • Missing core functionality

High (Affects quality):

  • Performance targets not met
  • Test coverage below target
  • Missing error handling

Medium (Technical debt):

  • Code quality issues
  • Documentation gaps

Phase 5: TODO Generation

## Phase [N]: [NAME]

### Critical Priority
- [ ] [Component] - [Missing item]
  - File: path/to/file.rs
  - Plan: plans/0X-phase.md:LineNumber
  - Impact: [Description]
  - Effort: [Estimate]

Output Format

# Plan Gap Analysis Report
**Total Requirements**: X
**Implemented**: Y (Z%)
**Gaps Identified**: N

## By Phase
- Phase 1: X/Y complete
- Phase 2: X/Y complete
- ...

## Critical Gaps
1. [Gap] - Priority, Effort

Best Practices

✓ Be systematic: Check every requirement ✓ Be specific: Reference exact file locations ✓ Be accurate: Verify, don't assume ✓ Be prioritized: Critical > High > Medium > Low ✓ Be actionable: Include file paths and estimates

Related skills

More from d-o-hub/rust-self-learning-memory

Installs
38
GitHub Stars
7
First Seen
Feb 21, 2026