requirements-gathering
Requirements Gathering
Overview
This skill guides you through systematic requirements gathering and documentation for software projects, from initial stakeholder analysis to detailed specifications and acceptance criteria.
Requirements Gathering Workflow
1. Planning & Stakeholder Analysis
Identify Stakeholders:
- Map stakeholder categories: executives, users, developers, operations
- Assess influence, interest, and availability
- Plan engagement strategy for each stakeholder group
Select Elicitation Techniques:
- Interviews: One-on-one discussions for deep insights (see elicitation-techniques.md)
- Workshops: Collaborative sessions for alignment
- Document Analysis: Review existing systems and documentation
- Observation: Job shadowing to understand workflows
- Surveys: Gather input from large user groups
- Prototyping: Validate requirements with mockups
2. Requirements Elicitation
Conduct Stakeholder Sessions:
- Prepare structured interview questions
- Focus on current pain points and desired outcomes
- Document business context, goals, and constraints
- Capture exact quotes for later reference
- Follow up with clarifications as needed
Key Questions to Ask:
- What problems are you trying to solve?
- What does success look like?
- Who will use this system and how?
- What are your constraints (budget, timeline, technical)?
- What are must-have vs nice-to-have features?
3. Requirements Analysis & Documentation
Document Requirements:
Choose format based on project methodology:
For Agile Projects - Use user stories (see agile-requirements.md):
As a [role]
I want [capability]
So that [business value]
Acceptance Criteria:
- Given [context]
- When [action]
- Then [outcome]
For Traditional Projects - Use structured specifications:
- Business Requirements Document (BRD): High-level business needs
- Functional Requirements: What system must do
- Non-Functional Requirements: Performance, security, usability
- Use Cases: Detailed user-system interactions
Classify Requirements:
- Functional vs Non-Functional
- Business vs Technical vs User
- Must-Have vs Should-Have vs Could-Have vs Won't-Have (MoSCoW)
4. Requirements Prioritization
Apply Prioritization Framework (see prioritization-frameworks.md):
- MoSCoW: Must/Should/Could/Won't have (good for stakeholder alignment)
- Value vs Effort: Plot on 2×2 matrix (quick wins vs long-term investments)
- RICE: Reach × Impact × Confidence / Effort (data-driven scoring)
- Kano Model: Basic/Performance/Delight features (user satisfaction focus)
5. Validation & Refinement
Review Requirements Quality:
- Clear: Unambiguous, easy to understand
- Complete: All necessary information included
- Consistent: No contradictions
- Testable: Can verify when implemented
- Feasible: Technically and economically viable
- Traceable: Linked to business goals
Get Stakeholder Sign-Off:
- Review with each stakeholder group
- Address conflicts and gaps
- Document approvals and changes
- Maintain requirements traceability matrix
Key Deliverables
Depending on project needs, produce:
- Stakeholder Analysis: Categories, needs, engagement plan
- Interview Summaries: Key findings and quotes
- User Stories/Use Cases: Detailed functionality descriptions
- Requirements Document: BRD, SRS, or PRD
- Requirements Traceability Matrix: Links requirements to business goals, design, tests
- Product Roadmap: Prioritized feature timeline
Reference Files
Load these on demand based on specific needs:
Process Guidance
- elicitation-techniques.md - Detailed interview techniques, workshop facilitation, and observation methods
- agile-requirements.md - User story writing, backlog management, sprint planning, and acceptance criteria
- prioritization-frameworks.md - MoSCoW, RICE, Kano, Value/Effort frameworks with examples
- requirements-gathering-process.md - End-to-end process from initiation to sign-off
- best-practices.md - Quality standards, common pitfalls, and validation checklists
Documentation Templates
- requirements-traceability-matrix.md - Template and examples for tracking requirements
- use-case-overview.md - Use case structure and examples
Best Practices Summary
Avoid Common Pitfalls:
- ❌ Solution-focused: "Use React framework" → ✅ "Provide responsive web interface"
- ❌ Vague language: "System should be fast" → ✅ "System responds within 2 seconds for 95% of requests"
- ❌ Gold plating: Focus on business value, not nice-to-haves
- ❌ Assuming knowledge: Document all assumptions and define terms
- ❌ Skipping validation: Always review and get stakeholder sign-off
Requirements Quality: Every requirement must be clear, complete, consistent, testable, feasible, necessary, prioritized, and traceable.
More from dauquangthanh/hanoi-rainbow
frontend-design-review
Conducts comprehensive frontend design reviews covering UI/UX design quality, design system validation, accessibility compliance, responsive design patterns, component library architecture, and visual design consistency. Evaluates design specifications, Figma/Sketch files, design tokens, interaction patterns, and user experience flows. Identifies usability issues, accessibility violations, design system deviations, and provides actionable recommendations for improvement. Produces detailed design review reports with severity-rated findings, visual examples, and implementation guidelines. Use when reviewing frontend designs, validating design systems, ensuring accessibility compliance, evaluating component libraries, assessing responsive designs, or when users mention design review, UI/UX review, Figma review, design system validation, accessibility audit, or frontend design quality.
276frontend-ui-ux-design
Creates comprehensive frontend UI/UX designs including user interfaces, design systems, component libraries, responsive layouts, and accessibility implementations. Produces wireframes, mockups, design specifications, and implementation guidelines. Use when designing user interfaces, creating design systems, building component libraries, implementing responsive designs, ensuring accessibility compliance, or when users mention UI design, UX design, interface design, design systems, user experience, or frontend design patterns.
167keycloak-administration
Provides comprehensive KeyCloak administration guidance including realm management, user/group administration, client configuration, authentication flows, identity brokering, authorization policies, security hardening, and troubleshooting. Covers SSO configuration, SAML/OIDC setup, role-based access control (RBAC), user federation (LDAP/AD), social login integration, multi-factor authentication (MFA), and high availability deployments. Use when configuring KeyCloak, setting up SSO, managing realms and clients, troubleshooting authentication issues, implementing RBAC, or when users mention "KeyCloak", "SSO", "OIDC", "SAML", "identity provider", "IAM", "authentication flow", "user federation", "realm configuration", or "access management".
165oracle-cloud
Provides comprehensive Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) guidance including compute instances, networking (VCN, load balancers, VPN), storage (block, object, file), database services (Autonomous Database, MySQL, NoSQL), container orchestration (OKE), identity and access management (IAM), resource management, cost optimization, and infrastructure as code (Terraform OCI provider, Resource Manager). Produces infrastructure code, deployment scripts, configuration guides, and architectural diagrams. Use when designing OCI architecture, provisioning cloud resources, migrating to Oracle Cloud, implementing OCI security, setting up OCI databases, deploying containerized applications on OKE, managing OCI resources, or when users mention "Oracle Cloud", "OCI", "Autonomous Database", "VCN", "OKE", "OCI Terraform", "Resource Manager", "Oracle Cloud Infrastructure", or "OCI migration".
82backend-design
Designs comprehensive backend systems including RESTful APIs, microservices, database architecture, authentication/authorization, caching strategies, message queues, and scalability patterns. Produces API specifications, database schemas, architecture diagrams, and implementation guides. Use when designing backend services, APIs, data models, distributed systems, authentication flows, or when users mention backend architecture, API design, database design, microservices, or server-side development.
55requirement-review
Conducts comprehensive requirements review including completeness validation, clarity assessment, consistency checking, testability evaluation, and standards compliance. Produces detailed review reports with findings, gaps, conflicts, and improvement recommendations. Use when reviewing requirements documents (BRD, SRS, user stories), validating acceptance criteria, assessing requirements quality, identifying gaps and conflicts, or ensuring standards compliance (IEEE 830, INVEST criteria). Trigger when users mention "review requirements", "validate requirements", "check requirements quality", "find requirement issues", or "assess BRD/SRS quality".
52