fix-it
Installation
SKILL.md
Fix It
Operating contract
Shared by every DecisionNerd/dev-skills skill. Canonical copy: handbook/concepts/14-operating-contract.md.
- Define done first. Before using tools, write the finish line in one or two lines: acceptance criteria (existing issue AC, BDD scenarios, tests, or contract; otherwise propose them and where they should live) and the evidence that will prove them. Re-check it before reporting done. Never report done on unverified work.
- Requested scope sets the finish line. A question ("is it ready?", "why is it broken?", "what next?") ends with the answer and a
Next:line naming the exact next invoke. An outcome request ("fix", "finish", "land", "#42") continues through the chain (diagnose → fix → test → check-readiness → merge-it) until the outcome or a real blocker. Do not end a turn with "Do you want me to…?" for in-scope, in-repo work. - Stop only for real blockers. Stop and ask only when you cannot continue without the user, or before: deleting data or unmerged work, force-push or history rewrite, changing anything outside this repository (GitHub objects, deployments, live data, production or paid resources, external services), or leaving the requested scope, unless the user's request already named that exact action. Keep the harness's permission prompts for risky commands. Otherwise keep going and put status notes in the same message as the next action.
- Ask well, once. For a genuine question use the harness's structured question tool when it has one (Claude Code:
AskUserQuestion; Codex:request_user_inputwhen the current mode supports it; T3 Code: thequestiontool) with concrete options; otherwise plain text with numbered options. Treat the answer as settled; do not re-open earlier verdicts, plans, or answers unless asked. - Fan out when work is parallel. Use subagents for independent reads (repo survey, evidence gathering, per-option research, per-area audits) and independent verification (a reviewer that did not write the change). Writes stay single-owner per path set and sequential. Brief every child with goal, done-when, constraints, must-not, and return shape; verify each result before consolidating. Use Claude Code's
Workflowtool only when orchestrating many subagents truly needs it; it is expensive. T3 Code: its delegated subagents — with optional worktree isolation for independent verification — cover this without theWorkflowtool. - Pick the model tier per child; defer to routing config. If the harness or user config already routes subagents, follow it and do not pass a model. Otherwise pick a tier per child: mechanical search or inventory → fast/cheap; implementation and evidence gathering → mid; planning, review, adversarial verification → top. Tier names differ per harness (Claude Code:
haiku/sonnet/opusorfable; T3 Code: inherit by default or pick from its live provider/model catalog). Set the choice with the harness's spawnmodelparam or agent frontmattermodel:(per-harness details:skills/agents/references/sub.md). Where the harness cannot choose, children inherit or the harness picks; say which in the status note. - Keep a checklist on long runs. For more than about five steps or work that crosses skills, keep
TASKS.mdat the repo root and tick items as they finish. Do not commit it unless the repo already tracks one. - Close every run with three headings.
Blocked on me(the one genuine question or blocker, else "none");Changed(files, commits, GitHub objects, deploys, else "nothing");Found(evidence, verdict, andNext: <exact invoke>).
Goal
Turn a diagnosis into a decision-complete implementation plan that another agent or engineer can execute confidently. Bridge between diagnosis (troubleshoot-app / diagnose-bug) and code work.