[IMPORTANT] Use TaskCreate to break ALL work into small tasks BEFORE starting.

Prerequisites: MUST READ before executing:

• .claude/skills/shared/web-research-protocol.md

OOP & DRY Enforcement: MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST — flag duplicated patterns that should be extracted to a base class, generic, or helper. Classes in the same group or suffix (ex *Entity, *Dto, *Service, etc...) MUST inherit a common base (even if empty now — enables future shared logic and child overrides). Verify project has code linting/analyzer configured for the stack.

Quick Summary

Goal: Review knowledge artifacts for quality, completeness, and protocol compliance.

Workflow:

1. Read artifact — Load the knowledge report/course/strategy
2. Template compliance — Verify all enforced sections present
3. Citation audit — Check inline citations and source table
4. Confidence check — Verify scores match evidence
5. Output review — Summary with pass/warn/fail per check

Key Rules:

• Every section from template must be present and non-empty
• Every factual claim must have inline citation
• Confidence scores must match evidence basis
• READ-ONLY — do not modify the artifact

Be skeptical. Apply critical thinking, sequential thinking. Every claim needs traced proof, confidence percentages (Idea should be more than 80%).

Knowledge Review

Review Checklist

1. Template Compliance

• All enforced sections present
• No sections are empty placeholders
• Section order matches template

2. Citation Audit

• Every factual claim has inline citation [N]
• Every source in Sources table is referenced in text
• No orphan citations
• Sources table has: Title, URL, Author, Date, Tier

3. Confidence Accuracy

• Per-finding confidence scores declared
• Overall confidence declared
• Scores match evidence basis (not inflated)
• Findings <60% flagged prominently

4. Source Quality

• Tier distribution appropriate (not all Tier 4)
• At least 50% Tier 1-2 sources for key claims
• Recency appropriate for topic type

5. Knowledge Gaps

• Gaps section is present and honest
• Known limitations declared
• Suggestions for further research included

6. Cross-Validation

• Key claims verified by 2+ sources
• Discrepancies noted where sources conflict
• Single-source claims marked as unverified

7. Actionability

• Recommendations are concrete (not vague)
• Next steps are evidence-based
• Executive summary captures key findings

Output Format

## Knowledge Review Result

**Status:** PASS | WARN | FAIL
**Artifact:** {path}

### Checks (N/7 passed)

- [x] Template compliance
- [x] Citation audit
- [ ] Confidence accuracy — {issue}
- [ ] Source quality — {issue}
      ...

### Issues

- {specific issues found}

### Verdict

{APPROVED | REVISE | BLOCKED}

---

IMPORTANT Task Planning Notes (MUST FOLLOW)

• Always plan and break work into many small todo tasks using TaskCreate
• Always add a final review todo task to verify work quality and identify fixes/enhancements