offer-comparison-analyzer
---name: Offer Comparison Analyzer description: Compare multiple job offers side-by-side with total compensation analysis
version: 2.0.0 author: Eric Andrade category: career risk: safe platforms: [github-copilot, claude-code, codex, opencode, gemini, antigravity, cursor, adal]
Offer Comparison Analyzer
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when the user:
- Has multiple job offers to compare
- Needs to evaluate total compensation
- Wants to make a data-driven job decision
- Is weighing different opportunities
- Mentions: "compare offers", "multiple offers", "which job", "offer comparison", "deciding between jobs"
Core Capabilities
- Compare total compensation across offers
- Evaluate non-monetary factors
- Create weighted decision frameworks
- Calculate true offer value
- Identify hidden costs and benefits
- Guide the decision-making process
The Comparison Challenge
The Problem: Comparing offers is hard because:
- Different compensation structures
- Non-monetary factors matter
- Hidden benefits and costs
- Emotional factors cloud judgment
- Information asymmetry
The Solution: Systematic comparison framework that considers:
- Total compensation (not just salary)
- Career growth potential
- Work-life factors
- Risk assessment
- Personal values alignment
Total Compensation Calculator
Components to Include
Cash Compensation:
- Base salary
- Signing bonus (one-time)
- Annual bonus (target %)
- Commission (for sales roles)
- Relocation assistance
Equity Compensation:
- Stock options (value = current price - strike price)
- RSUs (value = current price × shares)
- Vesting schedule
- Refresh grant expectations
Benefits Value:
- Health insurance (employer contribution)
- 401(k) match
- HSA/FSA contributions
- Life/disability insurance
- Other insurance benefits
Perks Value:
- Vacation days (can assign $ value)
- Remote work (saves commute costs)
- Professional development budget
- Equipment/office stipend
- Meals, gym, etc.
Calculation Template
OFFER A - TOTAL COMPENSATION
CASH
Base Salary: $150,000
Signing Bonus (year 1 only): $25,000
Target Bonus (15%): $22,500
--------------------------------
Cash Compensation: $197,500 (year 1)
$172,500 (ongoing)
EQUITY
RSU Grant: $200,000 over 4 years
Annual Value: $50,000
--------------------------------
Equity Compensation: $50,000/year
BENEFITS
401(k) Match (4%): $6,000
Health Insurance: $15,000 (employer portion)
HSA Contribution: $1,000
--------------------------------
Benefits Value: $22,000/year
PERKS
Vacation: 20 days (vs 10 standard)
Extra 10 days × ~$575/day: $5,750 value
Remote Work Savings: $3,000 (commute, lunch)
Professional Dev: $2,000 budget
--------------------------------
Perks Value: $10,750/year
TOTAL YEAR 1: $280,250
TOTAL ONGOING: $255,250/year
Parallel Offer Analysis
For each offer, launch 8 analyzers simultaneously. If comparing N offers, launch all 8×N agents in one block.
Compensation agents:
| Agent | Role |
|---|---|
CashAnalyzer |
Sum base salary + target bonus + signing bonus. Annualize. Account for bonus probability. |
EquityAnalyzer |
Calculate equity value: RSU shares × current/projected price ÷ vesting years. Note cliff and vesting schedule. |
BenefitsAnalyzer |
Quantify 401k match (annual $), insurance premiums saved vs. market rate, HSA contribution, other benefits. |
PerksAnalyzer |
Quantify: vacation days × daily rate, commute cost savings (remote vs. in-office), learning/dev budget, other perks. |
Non-monetary scoring agents:
| Agent | Role |
|---|---|
GrowthScorer |
Score 0–10: career trajectory, learning opportunities, brand-name value, promotion clarity |
WorkLifeScorer |
Score 0–10: expected hours, flexibility, remote policy, travel burden, on-call requirements |
CultureScorer |
Score 0–10: team dynamics, manager quality, company values alignment, DEI signals |
RiskScorer |
Score 0–10 (inverted — lower = more stable): funding runway, layoff history, industry volatility, severance terms |
Each agent prompt begins with:
# {AgentName} — Offer Analysis Agent
Role: Analyze ONLY {DIMENSION} for {OFFER_NAME}. Return a structured result with numbers and brief justification.
Wait for all agents to complete. Build total compensation comparison table and weighted scoring matrix.
Side-by-Side Comparison Template
# OFFER COMPARISON
| | Company A | Company B | Notes |
|--------------------------|-----------|-----------|-------|
| **CASH** | | | |
| Base Salary | $150,000 | $160,000 | B +$10K |
| Signing Bonus | $25,000 | $10,000 | A +$15K |
| Target Bonus | 15% | 10% | A +$6.5K |
| **Cash Total (Yr 1)** | $197,500 | $186,000 | A +$11.5K |
| | | | |
| **EQUITY** | | | |
| Grant Value (4yr) | $200,000 | $300,000 | B +$100K |
| Annual Equity | $50,000 | $75,000 | B +$25K |
| | | | |
| **BENEFITS** | | | |
| 401(k) Match | 4% | 6% | B +$3.2K |
| Health Insurance | Good | Premium | B better |
| PTO | 20 days | Unlimited | Varies |
| | | | |
| **TOTAL COMP (Yr 1)** | $280,250 | $285,000 | B +$4.7K |
| **TOTAL COMP (Ongoing)** | $255,250 | $275,000 | B +$19.7K |
Non-Monetary Factor Framework
Career Growth (Weight: High)
Questions to Consider:
- Which role offers more learning?
- Which company/brand helps future job search?
- Which has better promotion track?
- Which offers more scope/responsibility?
- Which manager will develop you more?
Scoring:
Company A: Growth Score
- Learning opportunity: 8/10
- Brand/resume value: 7/10
- Promotion potential: 6/10
- Scope: 8/10
Average: 7.25/10
Company B: Growth Score
- Learning opportunity: 7/10
- Brand/resume value: 9/10
- Promotion potential: 8/10
- Scope: 7/10
Average: 7.75/10
Work-Life Balance (Weight: Personal)
Factors:
- Expected hours
- Remote/hybrid flexibility
- Vacation usage culture
- On-call requirements
- Travel requirements
- Commute time
Team & Culture (Weight: High)
Factors:
- Manager quality (crucial!)
- Team health/dynamics
- Company culture fit
- DEI considerations
- Company stability/growth
- Values alignment
Risk Assessment (Weight: Medium)
Startup vs. Established:
- Funding runway
- Market position
- Company trajectory
- Equity risk (could be worth $0)
Questions:
- What happens if company struggles?
- How stable is this role?
- What's the severance policy?
Weighted Decision Matrix
Step 1: Define Your Priorities
Factor Weight
------------------------------------
Total Compensation 25%
Career Growth 25%
Work-Life Balance 20%
Team & Culture 20%
Location/Commute 10%
------------------------------------
Total: 100%
Step 2: Score Each Factor
Company A Company B
Factor Score (1-10)
------------------------------------
Compensation 7 8
Career Growth 7 8
Work-Life 8 6
Team & Culture 9 7
Location 8 5
Step 3: Calculate Weighted Score
Company A:
(7 × 0.25) + (7 × 0.25) + (8 × 0.20) + (9 × 0.20) + (8 × 0.10)
= 1.75 + 1.75 + 1.60 + 1.80 + 0.80
= 7.70
Company B:
(8 × 0.25) + (8 × 0.25) + (6 × 0.20) + (7 × 0.20) + (5 × 0.10)
= 2.00 + 2.00 + 1.20 + 1.40 + 0.50
= 7.10
Result: Company A scores higher (7.70 vs 7.10)
Red Flags to Watch
In the Offer
- ❌ Vague bonus language ("up to 20%")
- ❌ Equity with no liquidity path
- ❌ High base but no equity (at startup)
- ❌ Cliff longer than 1 year
- ❌ Vesting acceleration absent
- ❌ Non-compete restrictions
- ❌ Verbal promises not in writing
About the Company
- ❌ High turnover (check LinkedIn)
- ❌ Recent layoffs or reorgs
- ❌ Manager seems checked out
- ❌ Glassdoor patterns in bad reviews
- ❌ Funding concerns
- ❌ Unclear path to profitability
About the Role
- ❌ Vague responsibilities
- ❌ Role seems to change during interviews
- ❌ Red flags in why position is open
- ❌ No growth path discussed
- ❌ Unrealistic expectations set
Questions to Ask Yourself
The Gut Check
- Which offer excites me more?
- Which would I regret not taking?
- Which aligns with my 5-year goals?
- Which would I brag about to friends?
The Monday Morning Test
- Which job do I want to wake up for?
- Which team do I want to work with?
- Which problems do I want to solve?
The Learning Test
- Where will I grow more?
- Which skills will I develop?
- Which looks better on my resume in 3 years?
The Risk Test
- What's the downside of each?
- Which failure would I regret more?
- What's my backup plan for each?
Progress Tracking
Display progress before each comparison phase:
[████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░] 25% — Phase 1/4: Collecting Offer Details
[████████░░░░░░░░░░░░] 50% — Phase 2/4: Calculating Total Compensation
[████████████░░░░░░░░] 75% — Phase 3/4: Scoring Against Priorities
[████████████████████] 100% — Phase 4/4: Delivering Recommendation
Output Format
When comparing offers:
# JOB OFFER COMPARISON
## Offers Being Compared
- **Offer A:** [Role] at [Company]
- **Offer B:** [Role] at [Company]
## Total Compensation Comparison
| Component | Offer A | Offer B | Difference |
|-----------|---------|---------|------------|
| Base | $X | $X | |
| Bonus | $X | $X | |
| Equity (annual) | $X | $X | |
| Benefits | $X | $X | |
| **Year 1 Total** | $X | $X | |
| **Ongoing Total** | $X | $X | |
## Non-Monetary Comparison
| Factor | Offer A | Offer B | Notes |
|--------|---------|---------|-------|
| Career Growth | X/10 | X/10 | |
| Work-Life | X/10 | X/10 | |
| Team/Culture | X/10 | X/10 | |
| Risk Level | X/10 | X/10 | |
## Weighted Analysis
Using your priorities:
- Offer A Score: X.XX
- Offer B Score: X.XX
## Key Differences
1. [Key difference 1]
2. [Key difference 2]
3. [Key difference 3]
## Recommendation
Based on your stated priorities of [X, Y, Z], **Offer [A/B]** appears to be the stronger choice because:
- [Reason 1]
- [Reason 2]
- [Reason 3]
## Things to Clarify Before Deciding
- [ ] [Question for Company A]
- [ ] [Question for Company B]
## Negotiation Opportunities
- [Opportunity 1]
- [Opportunity 2]
Error Handling
| Error | Likely Cause | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Only one offer provided | User asks to compare but shares only one option | Proceed as single-offer analysis; ask if user has other offers or is considering staying in current role |
| Incomplete offer details | Missing salary, equity, or benefits information | Flag gaps explicitly; ask user to fill in what they know; estimate where possible and flag estimates |
| Non-standard equity structure | RSUs vs. options vs. profit sharing vs. warrants | Ask for clarification on equity type, cliff, vesting schedule, and last valuation |
| High uncertainty in startup equity | Private company with no known valuation | Calculate a range using conservative and optimistic scenarios; explain assumptions |
| Offers in different currencies | One offer in USD, another in EUR or BRL | Convert to common currency at current exchange rate; note exchange rate risk |
| Non-monetary factors hard to compare | Culture, commute, growth potential are subjective | Create scoring rubric with user-defined weights; let user rate each factor |
Comparison Checklist
- ✅ Calculated total comp (not just base)
- ✅ Included equity with realistic valuation
- ✅ Factored in benefits value
- ✅ Considered tax implications
- ✅ Weighted non-monetary factors
- ✅ Assessed career growth potential
- ✅ Evaluated team and manager quality
- ✅ Checked company stability/risk
- ✅ Aligned with personal priorities
- ✅ Gut-checked the decision
More from ericgandrade/claude-superskills
mckinsey-strategist
This skill should be used when the user needs structured strategic analysis and high-impact executive recommendations for complex business problems.
36docling-converter
This skill should be used when the user needs to convert documents (PDF, DOCX, PPTX, XLSX, HTML, images) into structured Markdown or JSON using Docling. Also use when the user wants to convert a PowerPoint presentation (.pptx) to Markdown.
28job-description-analyzer
This skill should be used when the user needs to analyze a job posting, calculate resume-to-job match scores, identify skill gaps, and create an application strategy. Use when evaluating fit for a specific role, extracting key requirements, or preparing targeted resume and cover letter materials.
21resume-ats-optimizer
This skill should be used when the user needs to optimize a resume for Applicant Tracking Systems, check ATS compatibility, and analyze keyword match against a job description. Use when a resume is failing screening filters, keyword density is low, or formatting is causing ATS parsing errors.
19academic-cv-builder
This skill should be used when the user needs to format a curriculum vitae for academic positions including faculty, research, or postdoc roles. Use when organizing publications, grants, teaching experience, presentations, and service for tenure-track, lecturer, or research scientist applications.
18resume-tailor
This skill should be used when the user needs to customize a resume for a specific job posting while maintaining truthfulness. Use when adapting an existing resume to match a job description, repositioning experience for a new role, or aligning resume language with target role keywords and requirements.
17