langgraph-code-review
Pass
Audited by Gen Agent Trust Hub on Feb 15, 2026
Risk Level: LOW
Full Analysis
- [SAFE] (SAFE): The skill was analyzed across all ten threat categories and no malicious patterns were identified. It serves as a set of best practices for LangGraph developers.
- [Prompt Injection] (SAFE): No instructions designed to bypass agent constraints or safety protocols were found.
- [Data Exposure & Exfiltration] (SAFE): No sensitive file access or unauthorized data transmission patterns were detected.
- [Obfuscation] (SAFE): No encoded content or hidden characters were found in the skill metadata or body.
- [Unverifiable Dependencies & Remote Code Execution] (SAFE): The skill does not perform any remote script downloads or package installations.
- [Indirect Prompt Injection] (INFO): The skill is designed to review user-provided code, creating a potential surface for indirect injection. However, the risk is negligible as the skill only provides analysis and lacks dangerous capabilities like execution or persistent storage. 1. Ingestion points: User-provided Python code using LangGraph. 2. Boundary markers: Absent. 3. Capability inventory: Only text-based analysis; no subprocess or file-system writing capabilities. 4. Sanitization: None provided in the documentation.
- [Dynamic Execution] (SAFE): The skill contains no runtime code compilation or unsafe deserialization logic.
Audit Metadata