workbench-repo-brand-uplift
Workbench Repo Brand Uplift
Upgrade public GitHub repos into credible, proof-first artifacts. The target is not prettier prose; it is a first screen that makes the repo's value, proof, install path, and maturity obvious to a fresh outsider.
Source Standard
Use the Zonic/Evensong public surface as the design DNA:
- tactical telemetry over marketing copy;
- strong project name, short claim, visible proof, then navigation;
- industrial grid language: sparse sections, tight labels, mono metadata, restrained badges, sharp boundaries;
- public/private boundary stated clearly;
- evidence links before long narrative;
- no mascots, lore, fake momentum, private screenshots, raw logs, or internal run IDs in public docs.
When To Use
Use this for:
- README or repo-front-page polish;
- public repo metadata, topics, social-preview, examples, screenshots, or demo link updates;
- turning an internal workbench-quality repo into a public adoption surface;
- matching Evensong/Zonic visual and trust quality across multiple repos;
- "senior dev README uplift", "brand design", "make this repo public-ready", "adopt zonicdesign.art", or similar requests.
Do not use this to fake traction, invent benchmarks, rewrite unrelated code, or spray the same template across repos without repo-specific proof.
Brand Gates
Every uplift should pass these gates:
| Gate | Requirement |
|---|---|
| First-screen clarity | Project name, one-line claim, audience, and status visible before scrolling. |
| Proof before prose | Demo, screenshot, CLI output, benchmark, live URL, or PR evidence appears early. |
| Fresh-clone path | Install/run/test commands are current and scoped to this repo. |
| Architecture map | Human and agent can locate main modules, docs, examples, and ownership boundaries. |
| Maturity labels | Stable, experimental, research, internal, or archived surfaces are not mixed. |
| Public safety | No secrets, private IDs, raw transcripts, screenshots, or unreviewed claims. |
| Community path | Issues, contribution route, license, examples, and support boundary are clear. |
Workflow
- Inspect live repo state:
pwd,git status --short --branch,git remote -v. - Read current
README.md, package metadata, docs map, examples, and public assets only as needed. - Identify the strongest available proof. If proof is missing, add a clear "needs proof" residual risk instead of inventing one.
- Draft the README around proof, not vibes:
- name and claim;
- status badges only if accurate;
- public screenshot/demo/CLI evidence;
- quickstart;
- architecture map;
- examples;
- maturity and safety boundary;
- contribution path.
- Update adjacent public surfaces when relevant: package description, topics recommendation, docs links, examples, and public image references.
- Run touched-path checks. At minimum:
git diff --check, link/file existence checks for local docs, and repo-specific build/test commands if README quickstart changed. - If this is part of Workbench public docs or skill sync, route the patch
through
workbench-hermes-docs-sync.
Zonic GitHub Pattern
Use this shape unless the repo has a stronger native convention:
# PROJECT NAME
> One sentence: what it is, who uses it, and why it matters.
[status badges]
## Public Proof
- Live demo:
- Screenshot / CLI output:
- Latest verified command:
## Quickstart
```bash
...
```
## System Map
| Surface | Path | Purpose |
| --- | --- | --- |
## Maturity
| Surface | State | Notes |
| --- | --- | --- |
## Contributing / License
Keep the top compact. A README that needs a tour guide has already failed the landing-page job.
Verdict Contract
Return:
REPO_BRAND_UPLIFT
repo:
brand_dna_source:
target_audience:
public_surfaces_checked:
proof_used:
changed:
metadata_recommendations:
verification:
residual_risk:
next_repo_or_next_action:
VERDICT: PASS | FLAG | BLOCK
Use PASS only when the repo is materially clearer to a fresh outsider and all
new public claims have evidence. Use FLAG when the README is improved but
needs screenshot, live demo, CI, metadata, or maintainer action. Use BLOCK
when public claims would mislead users or leak private/internal material.
More from fearvox/multica-ultimate-workbench
workbench-conductor
Two-ring orchestration, routing, issue and comment discipline, and role boundaries for the Multica Workbench.
5workbench-sdd
Specification-driven development from raw requirement to product design, technical design, task list, execution, and verification.
5workbench-self-awareness-infra
Capability discovery and current-state verification for Heavy Path, ambiguous repo/runtime ownership, and runtime-dependent Standard Path work.
5workbench-design-docs
Product design, technical design documents, user-facing copy, specs, diagrams, and handoff documentation.
5workbench-token-context-discipline
Compact context, cache-aware execution, scoped evidence reads, and role-specific skill attachment discipline.
4workbench-product-brainstorming
Bounded product ideation, workflow design, ambition checks, tradeoffs, and smallest-test shaping.
4