spec-plan
spec-plan
Interview the user relentlessly about every aspect of a plan until reaching shared understanding. Walk down each branch of the design tree, resolving dependencies between decisions one by one.
When to Use
- User wants to stress-test a plan or design
- User says "grill me" or "poke holes in this"
- Before running
build-prd— spec-plan resolves ambiguity, build-prd structures the output - Complex feature with many interacting decisions that need to be resolved sequentially
When NOT to Use
- Requirements are already clear and documented — go straight to
build-prd - User just wants a quick opinion, not a deep interview
- Implementation is already underway
Workflow
1. Read existing context
If the plan originates from a GitHub issue:
gh issue view ISSUE_NUMBER --repo ORG/REPO --json body,title,comments
Read all comments too — treat existing questions and answers as already-resolved branches. Do not re-ask anything already answered.
If no issue, read project context:
cat project-instructions.md # or equivalent project instructions file
cat README.md
2. Interview — one question at a time
For each branch of the design tree:
- Ask one question
- Provide your recommended answer with reasoning
- Wait for the user's response
- Incorporate the answer and move to the next branch
Warning: ONE question at a time. This is not build-prd's batched Q1-Qn format. Go deep on each branch before moving to the next.
If a question can be answered by exploring the codebase, explore the codebase instead of asking.
3. Resolve dependencies
When decisions depend on each other, resolve the dependency first:
- Identify which decision blocks others
- Ask about the blocker first
- Then proceed to the dependent decisions
4. Handoff to build-prd (optional)
When all branches are resolved, offer:
All branches resolved. Want me to run /build-prd to structure this into a PRD?
If yes, the shared understanding from this interview becomes the input — build-prd can skip its discussion phase (Steps 1-3) and go straight to drafting.
Critical Rules
- One question at a time — depth over breadth
- Always provide your recommended answer — don't just ask, propose
- Never re-ask resolved questions — read issue comments first
- Explore code before asking — if the codebase has the answer, use it
- Start from where the conversation left off — respect prior discussion
More from fellowship-dev/dogfooded-skills
entropy-check
Sensor — checks doc freshness and computes domain quality grades. Never fixes. Detects staleness, missing coverage, and FlowChad gaps. Updates QUALITY_SCORE.md. Skips inapplicable signals per repo.
16distill
Post-mission audit and distillation — capture mode classifies a completed mission using an 8-code failure taxonomy and writes an audit JSON; analyze mode aggregates audit JSONs into a findings report and creates GitHub issues with recommendations.
14migrate-skill
Move a skill from claude-toolkit plugin (or local .claude/skills) into the dogfooded-skills library, then import it back. Use when consolidating skills into the shared repo.
14skill-builder
Write a high-quality agent skill — covers frontmatter spec, section structure, quality criteria, and common antipatterns.
13popsicle
Agent-native onboarding doc generator — builds coverage maps, health baselines, generated docs, and agent adapters so any AI tool can autonomously navigate your repo.
8setup-harness
Scaffold the knowledge layer for a repo — ARCHITECTURE.md, QUALITY_SCORE.md, enhanced docs/code-structure.md, docs/code-guidelines.md, and FlowChad flow stubs. Gives agents a map, not a 1,000-page manual.
8