design-patterns
Design Patterns Analyzer Skill
Purpose: Detect, suggest, and evaluate Gang of Four (GoF) design patterns in TypeScript/JavaScript codebases with stack-aware adaptations.
Core Capabilities
- Stack Detection: Identify primary framework/library (React, Angular, NestJS, Vue, Express, RxJS, Redux, ORMs)
- Pattern Detection: Find existing implementations of 23 GoF patterns
- Smart Suggestions: Recommend patterns to fix code smells, using stack-native idioms when available
- Quality Evaluation: Assess pattern implementation quality against best practices
Operating Modes
Mode 1: Detection
Trigger: User requests pattern detection or analysis Output: JSON report of patterns found with confidence scores and stack context
Workflow:
1. Stack Detection (package.json, tsconfig.json, framework files)
2. Pattern Search (Glob for candidates → Grep for signatures → Read for validation)
3. Classification (native to stack vs custom implementations)
4. Confidence Scoring (0.0-1.0 based on detection rules)
5. JSON Report Generation
Example invocation:
/design-patterns detect src/
/design-patterns analyze --format=json
Mode 2: Suggestion
Trigger: User requests pattern suggestions or refactoring advice Output: Markdown report with prioritized suggestions and stack-adapted examples
Workflow:
1. Code Smell Detection (switch statements, long parameter lists, global state, etc.)
2. Pattern Matching (map smell → applicable patterns)
3. Stack Adaptation (prefer native framework patterns over custom implementations)
4. Priority Ranking (impact × feasibility)
5. Markdown Report with Code Examples
Example invocation:
/design-patterns suggest src/payment/
/design-patterns refactor --focus=creational
Mode 3: Evaluation
Trigger: User requests pattern quality assessment Output: JSON report with scores per evaluation criterion
Workflow:
1. Pattern Identification (which pattern is implemented)
2. Criteria Assessment (correctness, testability, SOLID compliance, documentation)
3. Issue Detection (common mistakes, anti-patterns)
4. Scoring (0-10 per criterion)
5. JSON Report with Recommendations
Example invocation:
/design-patterns evaluate src/services/singleton.ts
/design-patterns quality --pattern=observer
Methodology
Phase 1: Stack Detection
Sources (in priority order):
package.json→ Check dependencies and devDependencies- Framework-specific files →
angular.json,next.config.*,nest-cli.json,vite.config.* tsconfig.json→ Check compilerOptions, paths, lib- File extensions →
*.jsx,*.tsx,*.vuepresence
Detection Rules (from signatures/stack-patterns.yaml):
- React:
reactin deps +*.jsx/*.tsxfiles - Angular:
@angular/core+angular.json - NestJS:
@nestjs/core+nest-cli.json - Vue:
vuev3+ +*.vuefiles - Express:
expressin deps +app.usepatterns - RxJS:
rxjsin deps + Observable usage - Redux/Zustand:
redux/zustandin deps + store patterns - Prisma/TypeORM:
prisma/typeormin deps + schema files
Output:
{
"stack_detected": {
"primary": "react",
"version": "18.2.0",
"secondary": ["typescript", "zustand", "prisma"],
"detection_sources": ["package.json", "tsconfig.json", "37 *.tsx files"],
"confidence": 0.95
}
}
Phase 2: Pattern Detection
Search Strategy:
-
Glob Phase: Find candidate files by naming convention
*Singleton*.ts,*Factory*.ts,*Strategy*.ts,*Observer*.ts, etc.*Manager*.ts,*Builder*.ts,*Adapter*.ts,*Proxy*.ts, etc.
-
Grep Phase: Search for pattern signatures (from
signatures/detection-rules.yaml)- Primary signals:
private constructor,static getInstance(),subscribe(),createXxx(), etc. - Secondary signals: Interface naming, delegation patterns, method signatures
- Primary signals:
-
Read Phase: Validate pattern structure
- Parse class/interface definitions
- Verify relationships (inheritance, composition, delegation)
- Check for complete pattern implementation vs partial usage
Confidence Scoring:
- 0.9-1.0: All primary + secondary signals present, structure matches exactly
- 0.7-0.89: All primary signals + some secondary, minor deviations
- 0.5-0.69: Primary signals present, missing secondary validation
- 0.3-0.49: Naming convention matches, weak structural evidence
- 0.0-0.29: Insufficient evidence, likely false positive
Classification:
native: Pattern implemented using stack-native features (React Context, Angular Services, NestJS Guards, etc.)custom: Manual TypeScript implementationlibrary: Third-party library providing pattern (RxJS Subject, Redux Store, etc.)
Phase 3: Code Smell Detection
Target Smells (from signatures/code-smells.yaml):
- Switch on Type → Strategy/Factory pattern
- Long Parameter List (>4) → Builder pattern
- Global State Access → Singleton (or preferably DI)
- Duplicated Conditionals on State → State pattern
- Scattered Notification Logic → Observer pattern
- Complex Object Creation → Factory/Abstract Factory
- Tight Coupling to Concrete Classes → Adapter/Bridge
- Repetitive Interface Conversions → Adapter pattern
- Deep Nesting for Feature Addition → Decorator pattern
- Large Class with Many Responsibilities → Facade pattern
Detection Heuristics:
- Grep for
switch (.*type),switch (.*kind),switch (.*mode) - Count function parameters:
function \w+\([^)]{60,}\)(approximation for >4 params) - Search for global access:
window\.,global\.,process\.env\.\w+(not in config files) - Find state conditionals:
if.*state.*===.*&&.*if.*state.*=== - Find notification patterns:
forEach.*notify,map.*\.emit\(
Phase 4: Stack-Aware Suggestions
Adaptation Logic (from signatures/stack-patterns.yaml):
IF pattern_detected == "custom" AND stack_has_native_equivalent:
SUGGEST: "Use stack-native pattern instead"
PROVIDE: Side-by-side comparison (current vs recommended)
ELSE IF code_smell_detected AND pattern_missing:
IF stack_provides_pattern:
SUGGEST: Stack-native implementation with examples
ELSE:
SUGGEST: Custom TypeScript implementation with best practices
ELSE IF pattern_implemented_incorrectly:
PROVIDE: Refactoring steps to fix anti-patterns
Example Adaptations:
| Pattern | Stack | Native Alternative | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Singleton | React | Context API + Provider | Use createContext() instead of getInstance() |
| Observer | Angular | RxJS Subject/BehaviorSubject | Use built-in Observables, not custom implementation |
| Decorator | NestJS | @Injectable() decorators + Interceptors | Use framework interceptors |
| Strategy | Vue 3 | Composition API composables | Use ref() + composables instead of classes |
| Chain of Responsibility | Express | Middleware (app.use()) |
Use Express middleware chain |
| Command | Redux | Action creators + reducers | Use Redux actions, not custom command objects |
Phase 5: Quality Evaluation
Criteria (from checklists/pattern-evaluation.md):
- Correctness (0-10): Does it match the canonical pattern structure?
- Testability (0-10): Can dependencies be mocked/stubbed easily?
- Single Responsibility (0-10): Does it do one thing only?
- Open/Closed Principle (0-10): Extensible without modification?
- Documentation (0-10): Clear intent, descriptive naming?
Scoring Guidelines:
- 9-10: Exemplary, reference-quality implementation
- 7-8: Good, minor improvements possible
- 5-6: Acceptable, notable issues to address
- 3-4: Problematic, significant refactoring needed
- 0-2: Incorrect or severely flawed
Issue Detection:
- Hard-coded dependencies (Singleton with new inside getInstance)
- God classes (too many responsibilities)
- Leaky abstractions (exposing internal structure)
- Missing error handling
- Poor naming (Strategy1, Strategy2 instead of descriptive names)
Output Formats
Detection Mode (JSON)
{
"metadata": {
"scan_date": "2026-01-21T10:30:00Z",
"scope": "src/",
"files_scanned": 147,
"execution_time_ms": 2341
},
"stack_detected": {
"primary": "react",
"version": "18.2.0",
"secondary": ["typescript", "zustand", "prisma"],
"detection_sources": ["package.json", "tsconfig.json", "37 *.tsx files"],
"confidence": 0.95
},
"patterns_found": {
"singleton": [
{
"file": "src/lib/api-client.ts",
"lines": "5-28",
"confidence": 0.85,
"type": "custom",
"signals": ["private constructor", "static getInstance", "private static instance"],
"note": "Consider using React Context instead for better testability"
}
],
"observer": [
{
"file": "src/hooks/useAuth.ts",
"lines": "12-45",
"confidence": 0.92,
"type": "native",
"implementation": "React useState + useEffect",
"note": "Correctly using React's built-in observer pattern"
}
],
"factory": [
{
"file": "src/services/notification-factory.ts",
"lines": "8-67",
"confidence": 0.78,
"type": "custom",
"signals": ["createNotification method", "type discrimination", "returns interface"]
}
]
},
"summary": {
"total_patterns": 7,
"native_to_stack": 4,
"custom_implementations": 3,
"by_category": {
"creational": 2,
"structural": 3,
"behavioral": 2
},
"by_confidence": {
"high": 5,
"medium": 2,
"low": 0
}
},
"recommendations": [
"Consider replacing custom Singleton (api-client.ts) with React Context for better DI",
"Review Factory pattern (notification-factory.ts) - could be simplified with strategy pattern"
]
}
Suggestion Mode (Markdown)
# Design Pattern Suggestions
**Scope**: `src/payment/`
**Stack**: React 18 + TypeScript + Stripe
**Date**: 2026-01-21
---
## High Priority
### 1. Strategy Pattern → `src/payment/processor.ts:45-89`
**Code Smell**: Switch statement on payment type (4 cases, 78 lines)
**Current Implementation** (lines 52-87):
```typescript
switch (paymentType) {
case 'credit':
// 20 lines of credit card logic
break;
case 'paypal':
// 15 lines of PayPal logic
break;
case 'crypto':
// 18 lines of crypto logic
break;
case 'bank':
// 12 lines of bank transfer logic
break;
}
Recommended (React-adapted Strategy):
// Define strategy interface
interface PaymentStrategy {
process: (amount: number) => Promise<PaymentResult>;
}
// Custom hooks as strategies
const useCreditPayment = (): PaymentStrategy => ({
process: async (amount) => { /* credit logic */ }
});
const usePaypalPayment = (): PaymentStrategy => ({
process: async (amount) => { /* PayPal logic */ }
});
// Strategy selection hook
const usePaymentStrategy = (type: PaymentType): PaymentStrategy => {
const strategies = {
credit: useCreditPayment(),
paypal: usePaypalPayment(),
crypto: useCryptoPayment(),
bank: useBankPayment(),
};
return strategies[type];
};
// Usage in component
const PaymentForm = ({ type }: Props) => {
const strategy = usePaymentStrategy(type);
const handlePay = () => strategy.process(amount);
// ...
};
Impact:
- Complexity: Reduces cyclomatic complexity from 12 to 2
- Extensibility: New payment methods = new hook, no modification to existing code
- Testability: Each strategy hook can be tested in isolation
- Effort: ~2 hours (extract logic into hooks, add tests)
Medium Priority
2. Observer Pattern → src/cart/CartManager.ts:23-156
Code Smell: Manual notification logic scattered across 8 methods
Current: Manual loops calling update functions Recommended: Use Zustand store (already in dependencies)
// Instead of custom observer:
import create from 'zustand';
interface CartStore {
items: CartItem[];
addItem: (item: CartItem) => void;
removeItem: (id: string) => void;
// Zustand automatically notifies subscribers
}
export const useCartStore = create<CartStore>((set) => ({
items: [],
addItem: (item) => set((state) => ({ items: [...state.items, item] })),
removeItem: (id) => set((state) => ({ items: state.items.filter(i => i.id !== id) })),
}));
// Components auto-subscribe:
const CartDisplay = () => {
const items = useCartStore((state) => state.items);
// Re-renders automatically on cart changes
};
Impact:
- LOC: Reduces from 156 to ~25 lines
- Stack-native: Uses existing Zustand dependency
- Testability: Zustand stores are easily tested
- Effort: ~1.5 hours
Summary
- Total suggestions: 4
- High priority: 2 (Strategy, Observer)
- Medium priority: 2 (Builder, Facade)
- Estimated total effort: ~6 hours
- Primary benefits: Reduced complexity, improved testability, stack-native idioms
### Evaluation Mode (JSON)
```json
{
"file": "src/services/config-singleton.ts",
"pattern": "singleton",
"lines": "5-34",
"scores": {
"correctness": 8,
"testability": 4,
"single_responsibility": 9,
"open_closed": 7,
"documentation": 6,
"overall": 6.8
},
"details": {
"correctness": {
"score": 8,
"rationale": "Implements singleton structure correctly with private constructor and static getInstance",
"issues": ["Missing thread-safety consideration (not critical in JS single-threaded context)"]
},
"testability": {
"score": 4,
"rationale": "Hard to mock or reset instance in tests",
"issues": [
"No reset method for test isolation",
"Static instance makes dependency injection impossible",
"Tests must run in specific order or share state"
],
"suggestions": [
"Add resetInstance() method for tests (with appropriate guards)",
"Consider using dependency injection instead"
]
},
"single_responsibility": {
"score": 9,
"rationale": "Focuses solely on configuration management",
"issues": []
},
"open_closed": {
"score": 7,
"rationale": "Configuration can be extended but requires modification for new sources",
"suggestions": ["Consider strategy pattern for configuration sources"]
},
"documentation": {
"score": 6,
"rationale": "Has JSDoc but missing rationale for singleton choice",
"suggestions": ["Document why singleton is chosen over DI", "Add usage examples"]
}
},
"recommendations": [
{
"priority": "high",
"suggestion": "Add test-friendly reset mechanism or refactor to use DI",
"rationale": "Current implementation makes testing difficult"
},
{
"priority": "medium",
"suggestion": "Document singleton rationale in JSDoc",
"rationale": "Team members should understand why global state is necessary here"
}
]
}
Constraints & Guidelines
Read-Only Analysis
- No modifications: This skill only analyzes and suggests, never modifies code
- No file creation: Does not generate refactored code files
- User decision: All suggestions require explicit user approval before implementation
Language Focus
- Primary: TypeScript (
.ts,.tsx) - Secondary: JavaScript (
.js,.jsx) - Exclusions: Other languages (Python, Java, C#) not supported
Pattern Coverage
- Creational (5): Singleton, Factory Method, Abstract Factory, Builder, Prototype
- Structural (7): Adapter, Bridge, Composite, Decorator, Facade, Flyweight, Proxy
- Behavioral (11): Chain of Responsibility, Command, Iterator, Mediator, Memento, Observer, State, Strategy, Template Method, Visitor, Interpreter
Performance Considerations
- Large codebases (>500 files): Use
--scopeto limit scan to specific directories - Parallel search: Grep searches run independently for each pattern
- Caching: Stack detection results cached per session to avoid redundant package.json reads
Usage Examples
Basic Detection
# Detect all patterns in src/
/design-patterns detect src/
# Detect only creational patterns
/design-patterns detect src/ --category=creational
# Focus on specific pattern
/design-patterns detect src/ --pattern=singleton
Targeted Suggestions
# Get suggestions for payment module
/design-patterns suggest src/payment/
# Focus on specific smell
/design-patterns suggest src/ --smell=switch-on-type
# High priority only
/design-patterns suggest src/ --priority=high
Quality Evaluation
# Evaluate specific file
/design-patterns evaluate src/services/api-client.ts
# Evaluate all singletons
/design-patterns evaluate src/ --pattern=singleton
# Full quality report
/design-patterns evaluate src/ --detailed
Integration with Other Skills
This skill can be inherited by:
refactoring-specialist.md→ Provides pattern knowledge for refactoringcode-reviewer.md→ Adds pattern detection to review processarchitecture-advisor.md→ Informs architectural decisions with pattern usage
Reference Files
reference/patterns-index.yaml→ Machine-readable index of 23 patterns with metadatareference/creational.md→ Creational patterns documentationreference/structural.md→ Structural patterns documentationreference/behavioral.md→ Behavioral patterns documentationsignatures/detection-rules.yaml→ Regex patterns and heuristics for detectionsignatures/code-smells.yaml→ Mapping from code smells to applicable patternssignatures/stack-patterns.yaml→ Stack detection rules and native pattern equivalentschecklists/pattern-evaluation.md→ Quality evaluation criteria and scoring guidelines
Version
Skill Version: 1.0.0 Pattern Coverage: 23 GoF patterns Supported Stacks: 8 (React, Angular, NestJS, Vue, Express, RxJS, Redux/Zustand, ORMs) Last Updated: 2026-01-21
More from florianbruniaux/ccboard
tdd-rust
Test-Driven Development workflow for Rust - write test first, watch it fail, implement minimal code
3ship
Build, commit, push & version bump workflow - automates the complete release cycle
1performance
Optimize web performance for faster loading and better user experience. Use when asked to "speed up my site", "optimize performance", "reduce load time", "fix slow loading", "improve page speed", or "performance audit".
1code-simplifier
|
1ccboard-remember
Store a fix, pattern, or context note in Brain knowledge base (~/.ccboard/insights.db)
1security-guardian
Expert en sécurité applicative pour détecter les vulnérabilités, auditer le code, et guider les bonnes pratiques de sécurité. OWASP Top 10, authentification, autorisation, cryptographie, gestion de secrets. Utiliser pour audits sécurité, reviews de code sensible, conception de features sécurisées, ou résolution de failles.
1